RENO v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION US Supreme Court‚ 1997 1. Claim: Attorney General Janet Reno‚ the appellant appealed directly to the Supreme Court as provided for by the Act’s special review provisions against the appellee‚ ACLU. 2. Facts: The 1996 Federal Communications Decency Act sought to protect minors from “indecent” and offensive Internet materials. The Act made it a crime to transmit obscene or indecent messages over the Internet. Immediately after the CDA became law‚ twenty
Premium Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States
Finally‚ on July 27‚ 2000‚ Marie Villette (plaintiff) had a carport installed from Sheldorado Aluminum Product (defendant). The covering would collapse six months later on top of the plaintiffs Mercedes Benz. All the plaintiff is requesting is the $3‚000 she has spent on the carport. Ms. Villette filed a lawsuit opposing Sheldorado expecting the return of her $3000. Ms. Villette and Sheldorado‚ had no formal written contract‚ however‚ there was a bill of sale; it is dated 11 July‚ 2000. Ms. Villette
Premium Contract Law Contract law
Name Date ? ? a e e e ‚lt ‚ The Three colonial sections-one society or Three? Part A. Study the accompanyrng maps to answer the following questions. In each instance‚ write the letter map (or maps) Jo"lJ"i‚‚g the inrormation‚ and cite speciric 1. :‚i:ff.oT:l :T#l:‚XHfff:J:: b. Scotch-trr:ish c. English d. Africans 2. The^nationality that was most cor’non a. German in ail trre colonies was ? a The colonial section a. South b. Middle Colonies c. New England wit] ttre
Premium Thirteen Colonies Connecticut United States
attention and hold onto to them until he had portrayed the information he had wanted. By the end of this document‚ the reader should have at least gained knowledge‚ understanding and insight about non-violence resistance. It is said…”Violence doesn’t solve anything.” Martin Luther King was illustrating that violence will not accomplish anything. In this document‚ Martin Luther King is unraveling slavery‚ oppression and justice. He uses a phenomenal metaphor by saying this about slaves‚ “He was considered
Free Nonviolence Civil disobedience Martin Luther King, Jr.
How to solve a Rubik’s cube The purpose of this report is to inform the audience on how to solve a Rubik’s cube in three simple steps. Solving a Rubik’s cube can be difficult; however by solving one layer at a time‚ and knowing the correct algorithm to use for each desired move‚ makes solving a Rubik’s cube easier than it looks. Introduction Invented by mechanics in 1974. There are over 43 quintillion possible combinations for solving a Rubik’s cube. That is 43‚252‚003‚274‚489‚856‚000. (information-facts)
Premium Algorithm
Summary R. v. Morgentaler was decided by the Supreme Court of Canada‚ a verdict which declared abortion laws in the Criminal Code of Canada as arbitrary and unconstitutional. The court ruled the laws to have violated the woman’s right to security of the person under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to security of person. After the ruling‚ you could not be charged under the Criminal Code of Canada for having an abortion without consent of the therapeutic abortion committee
Premium Abortion Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
130-144. 3. Kotler‚ P.‚ & Armstrong‚ G. (2013). Principles of Marketing 15th Global Edition. Pearson. 4. Hemalatha‚ A.‚ & Antony‚ V. (2014). A Study of Brand Loyalty on Toilet Soaps Buying Behaviour of Female Consumers in Tiruchirappalli. Journal Impact Factor‚ 5(5)‚ 11-21. 5. Shirts‚ Silkina‚ et al. (2006) "Box 9.8: Brands with a Weak Equity ’." Brand Management: Text and Cases‚ 372. 6. Indian Soap Industry retrieved 8 November 2014 from http://www.indianmirror.com/indian-industries/soap.html 7. Himalaya
Premium Brand Brand management
The KWETEY v. BOTCHWAY AND ANOTHER case explains the principle of “you cannot give what you do not have” which has its Latin as “Nemo dat quod non habet”. In this case‚ the bank‚ wanted to sell a boat that rightfully belonged to Kwetey and this was established by the court to be against the principle stated supra. The facts in Kwetey v Botchway are that the plaintiff had mortgaged his house to the Agricultural Development Bank (ADB) to secure a loan to replace a broken marine engine in a 40-footer
Premium Breach of contract Breach of contract Damages
FACTS OF THE CASE: The Appellant‚ Director of Finance at Toyota Marin Lou Suriyan Sisuphan‚ took almost $30‚000 in order to persuade the termination of Sisuphan’s coworker Ian McClelland by suggesting that McClelland should be held responsible for the lost money. The Appellant did not have the intention to take this money permanently‚ and returned the money before any charges were filed‚ but not within the 24 hour amnesty period that the dealership offered. The dealership terminated Sisphan’s employment
Premium
LAW 150 Mims v. Starbucks Corp. Fact: * Kevin Keevican‚ Kathleen Mims‚ and other former managers filed a suit against Starbucks seeking unpaid overtime and other amounts. * In Starbucks Corp. Stores the manager’s responsibilities include supervising and motivating six to thirty employees including supervisors and assistant managers‚ overseeing customer service and processes employee records‚ payrolls‚ and inventory counts. * He or she also develops strategies to increase revenues
Premium Management Employment