1. After the receipt of Preliminary assessment from the Board‚ the Children’s Court may decide that i. There is a need for trial of the child as an adult as per the provisions of Cr.P.C.‚ 1973‚ and pass appropriate orders after trial considering on the special needs of the child‚ the tenets of fair trial and maintain a child friendly atmosphere. Provided‚ no child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release‚ for any such offence‚
Premium Law Childhood Child
In the case of Ross vs Davis‚ I would certainly rule in favor of Davis. Davis decided to leave her career by choice a full year prior to Ross’s disclaimer. When person leaves a job or career‚ a written notice is usually given to the employer. It appears in this case‚ someone in the Human Resource Department‚ or another unknown source had left out some of the information that should have been directed to Diana Ross about Gail Davis decision to resign from the job. Being in the profession that
Premium Law Communist state Management
MAERSK LINE vs. CA G.R. No. 94761‚ May 17‚ 1993 FACTS: Petitioner Maersk Line is engaged in the transportation of goods by sea‚ doing business in the Philippines through its general agent‚ Compania de Tabacos de Filipinas‚ while private respondent Efren Castillo is the proprietor of Ethegal Laboratories‚ a firm engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. On Nov. 12‚ 1976‚ Castillo ordered from Eli Lilly‚ Inc. of Puerto Rico 600‚000 empty gelatin capsules for the manufacture of his
Premium Contract law Transport Legal documents
Every case starts with an alleged crime. In the Sandoval case‚ the crime was murder. Sandoval was soon put into the system after he was arrested. After the arrest‚ Sandoval would have been book and then gone to his first appearance hearing where he is informed that he was getting charged with first-degree murder. Next would be the preliminary hearing where the defense would have received an arraignment‚ formally charging the suspect of the crime and asking what his plea is. Some states do not have
Premium Criminal law Crime Law
Week 3 IW “Discretion & Court Cases” Discretion & Court Cases Discretion varies in each profession just as it does in each jurisdiction. It is how a person in an authoritative position conducts themselves and what they do in accordance with their profession and with ethical obligations as well as the law. Disparity is a major player in the terms of discretion which includes Race‚ Ethnicity‚ Gender‚ and Age. First and foremost society has set the mind frame for this which
Premium Law Police Appeal
Media in court cases has many effects. One of which is the possibility that the Medias opinion may result in tainting the jury with unproven facts. As humans we make decisions based on how we perceive the world and the information we have on decision we are going to make. Pre-Trial Publicity “Due to extensive media coverage‚ jury selection in a high profile case can be extremely difficult. Jurors will likely have developed some biases about the case based on the media coverage to which they have
Premium Jury Court Mass media
parliament. At the beginning of the Putney Debates‚ Sir Thomas Fairfax turned suddenly ill‚ and he selected Cromwell to take his place as moderator of the debates. Similar actions continued during the king’s trial. Fairfax was appointed to the special court to decide the fate of Charles I‚ however Fairfax never attended the actual trial. On the first day of the trial when Sir Fairfax’s name was called a voice responded with “He had more wit than to be here‚” which turned out to be Fairfax’s wife. In
Premium England Oliver Cromwell English Civil War
know what to do in a medical emergency because they have seen it done on television. The same goes for Americans’ knowledge about Court hearings and the judicial system. Many things are done on television by actors playing lawyers or judges that are done just for the purpose of entertainment. “Reality-based” Court shows such as Judge Judy‚ People’s Court and Divorce Court dominate television ratings every day. Because the judicial system is not well understood by most people or learned in school or
Premium Judge Law Court
The Courts biased view of Fathers in Family Court Decisions Fathers in family court decisions are given less rights compared to mothers. Fathers should be allowed the same treatment as mothers in family court decisions and they should not be seen as less worthy of custody of a child. Mothers are favored because of the nurturing stereotype but this is not always true and is an incorrect at times. Women in today’s society are more likely to receive residential custody than fathers
Premium Child custody Mother Parent
October 23rd 2011 SCI 183 Case Study: Scott Peterson- A case of Circumstantial evidence Presented to Dr. Lyer Presented Student number Department of Forensic Science Ted Rogers School of Management/ Kerr Hall Ryerson University Case Study- Essay/Report Use of physical evidence(DNA) and information- Scott Peterson: A case of Circumstantial Evidence Throughout this report‚ I will be furthermore talking about the conviction of Scott Peterson regarding the murder of his 27 year old
Premium Crime Jury United States