Each theory of justice has its own process and objective. As a result‚ the outcomes of crime differ. The purpose of this paper seeks to examine a crime through the lens of four theories of justice: retributive‚ utilitarian‚ restorative‚ and parallel. Moreover‚ the paper will elaborate more on each theory of justice‚ including the theory’s procedural and distributive justice‚ through its hypothetical application of a criminal case in Fairfax County‚ Virginia. These various theories of justice arose
Premium
Conceptions of justice can be broken down into two separate classifications. Firstly‚ there is the idealistic conception of justice and secondly the realistic conception of justice. The idealistic side of conceptions focuses on an expectation of fairness and a desire for a universal level of fairness whereas‚ the realistic conception focuses on the acceptance of chance and fate and the reality of risk and consequence. John Rawls ‘A theory of justice’ falls under the idealistic conception of justice. He described
Premium Political philosophy Justice John Rawls
2) Explain Plato’s theory of Justice One’s search for the meaning of justice in Plato’s “Republic” would finally lead to two definitions: -Justice is Harmony. -Justice is Doing one’s own job. Finding these two phrases‚ however‚ is hardly enough to get a clear sense of what justice is. Plato offers two main analogies to examine the definition of justice. The division of parts in the soul as well as the parts of the state; We would now examine the structure of the soul. The soul is divided into
Premium Soul Justice Plato
3.3. Robert Nozick on John Rawls. The publication of A Theory of Justice of Rawls is extensively acknowledged as an essential contribution to the notion of justice. However‚ his work raises many questions. One of the major responses to the book came from Robert Nozick in his book‚ Anarchy‚ State‚ and Utopia. Nozick offers a libertarian response to Rawls. Libertarian notion of politics implies that there is a recognition of natural human rights and if these rights are deprived would be an immoral
Premium Political philosophy Justice John Rawls
In order to begin to understand and analyze Dr. Peffer’s Theory of Social Justice‚ we want to first look at the five main principles. These principles are a Modified look at John Rawls’s “Two Principles” of Social Justice (1971). These five modified principles include The Basic Rights Principle‚ The Maximum Equal Basic Liberties Principle‚ The Fair Equality of Opportunity Principle‚ The Modified Difference Principle‚ The Social and Economic Democracy Principle. First of all‚ The Basic Rights Principle
Premium Socialism Third World Communism
The concept of justice has been the focus of normative political theory over the past 50 years‚ and John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice (1971) is widely seen as the most important attempt during that period to articulate a set of institutions and distributional outcomes that rational individuals would see as legitimate. Rawls’ seminal work has spawned a veritable critical industry since its publication (Miller‚ 1999). His elaboration of his project and restatement of his theory of “justice as fairness”
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy
The conventional accounts of Justice normally begin by stating a fundamental rule of Aristotle – Justice is to treat equals equally and unequals unequally‚ and that unequal treatment should be in proportion to the inequality. In everyday life though‚ justice is seen as an attribute of law‚ while all laws are not necessarily just. Many great socio- political movements of the world have focused from time to time on unjust laws eg Apartheid laws in South Africa and Caste laws in India. Impartiality
Premium John Rawls Justice Political philosophy
The law and theory of criminal justice Jessmine Matthews CJA/204 September 9‚ 2014 Julius Burns The law and theory of criminal justice Defining crime can come from many different perspectives such as psychological‚ legalistic‚ sociological‚ and even political views. Crime is defined as according to (Multi- Media) the conduct in violation of the criminal laws of the state‚ federal‚ government‚ or local jurisdiction‚ for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse. Crime is
Premium Crime Criminology Criminal law
Title: Theories of Justice Compare and contrast each of the three theories of justice Provide illustrative examples of each theory Write a conclusion identifying your preferred theory of justice along with your rationale for choosing the theory Retribution (Deserts Theory) This theory states that people should be punished only if they have done something to deserve it‚ and only to the extent to which it is deserved. This theory is only concerned with the past‚ which means it supports
Premium Punishment Criminal justice Justice
The Theory of Justice: Rawls Justice as Fairness: Introduction In a Theory of Justice‚ John Rawls argues that justice is to be understood in terms of fairness. A just society will be a society which is based upon principles. The principles are the best formulation of a social system which is not based upon personal interests or specific moral belief. These two principles are to serve as a framework for the construction and reformation of institutions. Rawls argues that the two principles of
Premium John Rawls Sociology A Theory of Justice