"Thomas hobbes vs immanuel kant" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 9 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and the Social Contract When analyzing the modern social contract theorists‚ one must take into account the conditions that the philosopher was living in while devising his social contract. Each theorist: Jean-Jacques Rousseau‚ John Locke and Thomas Hobbes all have the same idea but each has his theory rooted in very different beliefs. Rousseau formulated his theory in the middle of the French Enlightenment and the same theory breathed life into the intellectual basis for the French

    Premium Political philosophy State of nature Social contract

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher remembered today for his work in philosophy. Hobbes was a rationalist and tried to use the scientific method in his own works on power‚ politics‚ and human nature. His greatest work was the Leviathan written in the midst of a civil war. Hobbes discarded theory’s that placed secular power under theological authority. He believed that humans were moving organisms which were required to be restrained by authority to prevent them from pursuing selfish ends .

    Free Thomas Hobbes Political philosophy Social contract

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hegel Vs Kant

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lanz Romulo N. Deiparine ENGLCOM A56 24-02-12 Compare and Contrast Essay on Spirit as the Philosophical State of Mind (Hegel’s Spirit/Mind and Philosophies VS. Kant’s Reason/Soul and Philosophies) I. Introduction II. Argument 1: Divisions and Facilities A.) Divisions of Spirit B.) Faculties of Soul III. Argument 2: Idealism A.) Hegelian Absolute Idealism B.) Kantian Transcendental Idealism IV. Argument three: The Dialectic A.) Hegelian Theory of Dialectics

    Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Metaphysics

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    the world passed down to them from their parents‚ or is an individual born with certain thoughts and opinions? Between the 16th and 18th centuries‚ many people began to think about these questions. In 1651‚ an English political philosopher named Thomas Hobbes published a book on the nature of man‚ titled The Leviathan. Four decades later‚ another English thinker named John Locke published his theories about mankind in its natural state‚ titled Second Treatise of Civil Government. Locke’s and Hobbes’s

    Premium Political philosophy State of nature Thomas Hobbes

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Leviathan‚ Thomas Hobbes argues that the fallacies of the State of nature can be remedied through the social contract.” if they think good‚ to a monarch as absolutely as to other representative“(pg. 241). Hobbes claims that the monarchy is the best form of government. I believe he assumes too much when he argues that the monarch will work for the same interests as the people and does not consider the alternative of a monarch who becomes corrupt from the absolute authority given to him. I will

    Premium Political philosophy Government Social contract

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant Vs Aristotle

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle vs. Kant Ethical Teachings Central to modern ethical teachings are the views expressed by Aristotle and Kant‚ whose writings and works have influenced ethical issues over centuries. This essay presents a comparison between the ethical teachings of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant with the use of three concepts presented by Aristotle and Kant which in the context of a contemporary ethical issue such as abortion. Firstly will consider the philosopher’s views and ideas on living the best possible

    Premium Ethics Philosophy Plato

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Summum Bonum” leads to the state of war where peace can only be achieved within an absolute monarchy? According to the 17th century philosopher‚ Thomas Hobbes‚ humans share a fundamental quality – an enduring desire for power‚ glory and self-perseverance‚ and in the right of nature it is upon each man’s liberty to use his own power to persist his existence. Hobbes‚ in one of his most influential texts‚ Leviathan (1651)‚ constructs arguments which justify destroying one’s fellow man to achieve one’s goals

    Premium Political philosophy State of nature Thomas Hobbes

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant vs. Singer

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    November 29‚ 2012 Singer VS. Kant Duty can be defined in numerous ways but what is difficult to know is what our moral obligations are? Immanuel Kant and Peter Singer have attempted to find a more simple‚ rational‚ and supreme rule for what our duty is. Singer makes the distinction between charity and duty.  He attempts to show that we‚ in affluent countries such as the United States‚ have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do in international aid for famine relief‚ disaster

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan A book called Leviathan (1660)‚ written by Thomas Hobbes‚ in argues that all social peace and unity is and can be achieved through the use of a sovereign power. Hobbes begins the Leviathan with his theories on man. He believes men are a basic creature and relativity simple. They are nothing but creatures that react to their surroundings‚ which leads to their wants and desires. Because the world’s environment is ever changing so is man. All of these different desires floating

    Premium Political philosophy Leviathan Thomas Hobbes

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What makes something right? In the study of philosophy‚ there are many views of what is right and what is wrong. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill have differing viewpoints of this topic. John Stuart Mill has a philosophy known as Utilitarianism. In this way of thinking‚ ethics are based on the maximization of pleasure. In other words‚ it’s based on the consequences of a given action. The basic principle of Utilitarianism is that "actions are right in so far as they tend to promote happiness

    Premium Ethics Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 50