The Trolley Problem is set up in two parts. The first part of this problem puts the reader in a passive position to choose between shoving a large person onto the track causing one person to die to save the five other people and refraining and doing nothing would allow the five to die and the one person to live. The second part of this scenario would put Frank in a very personal position to choose to do something about the situation at hand‚ or to let five people die; or deliberately push a large
Premium Death Morality Ethics
Reflection Introduction In this reflection‚ I am going to reflect about the competency No. 5 which talk about demonstrating the ability to check and identify the resuscitation equipment of the emergency trolley. What is reflection first of all. ”Reflection is an active process of witnessing one’s own experience in order to take a closer look at it‚ sometimes to direct attention to it briefly‚ but often to explore it in greater depth"(Burton 2000). Reflection is an effective methods for health
Premium Hospital Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Dublin
It would be equally wrong from a moral situation to kill anyone. The trolley driver is affected by the deontologist theory. There is no moral reason for the deontologist to choose between the car and the bus because both are impermissible. However‚ there is no avoidance alternative for the deontologist to choose one option
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
Question 1 Key audit objectives for a client’s payroll function 1. To confirm that the payroll function is properly controlled and operating efficiently. 2. To ensure that authority for all pay entitlement is clearly defined and effectively exercised. 3. To ensure that employees on the payroll are valid and that leavers do not remain on the payroll. 4. To ensure that salary additions are bona fide & timesheets are authorized 5. That payroll deductions are correctly applied. Auditors evaluate
Premium Audit Auditing Financial audit
making them unable to promote/create happiness. If maximizing utility is the goal‚ there is no doubt that condemning one to save five is permissible under utilitarian principles. The loop variant of the case follows exactly as the original case of the trolley problem. Seeing as it is handled in the same manner. The death or pain of one‚ and ultimately his or her family‚ is permissible due to the net happiness and utility of five people (and their families.) Another way to think of this scenario is that
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
The Trolley Dodgers In 1890‚ the Brooklyn Trolley Dodgers professionals’ baseball team joined the National League. Over the following years‚ the Dodgers would have considerable difficulty competing with the other baseball themes in the New York City area. Those teams‚ principal among them the New York Yankees‚ were much better financed and generally stocked with players of higher caliber. In 1958‚ after nearly seven decades of mostly frustration on and off the baseball field‚ the Dodgers shocked
Premium Major League Baseball Baseball Jackie Robinson
The trolley dilemma is a classic example of making an ethical choice that evokes the principles of Utilitarianism or Kantianism. The Trolley Dilemma is a thought experiment where there is a runaway train and it is heading down the tracks towards five workers you cannot directly do anything to stop the train‚ but you happen to be standing by a lever that will switch the tracks‚ only problem is there one man on the other track. And by pulling the lever you will kill him only instead‚ so you kill one
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
Free-Fall Acceleration Introduction Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)‚ the man first accredited with the correct notion of free-fall with uniform acceleration‚ stated that ’if one were to remove entirely the resistance of the medium‚ all materials would descend with equal speed.’ Today‚ this statement holds true for all objects in free-fall near the Earth’s surface. The purpose of this experiment is to verify Galileo’s assertion that acceleration is constant. In addition‚ the magnitude of acceleration will
Premium Acceleration
Finding the Acceleration of a Ball Problem Statement: How does the height of a ramp that is comprised of two parallel rulers affect the speed of a steel ball bearing rolling down it? Hypothesis: If the steepness of the ramp based on the amount of books propping it up are increased‚ then the steel ball bearings’ speed will increase. Materials: 2 wooden meter sticks 1 steel ball bearing 5 workbooks A roll of masking tape A stopwatch A smooth‚ long surface (preferably a table) Procedures: Arrange
Premium Classical mechanics Mass Velocity
In Act II‚ Scene 2 of Measure for Measure‚ the circumstance is that Angelo and Isabelle are negotiating about the death penalty that Isabella’s bother is going to receive the next. They are having this conversation because Isabella is pleading for Claudio’s life on his behalf. If her pleas fail to change Angelo’s mind‚ then her brother will perish. Angelo and Isabella position on mercy in the secular justice system are that Angelo is against mercy in the secular justice system. On the other hand
Premium Oedipus Sophocles Creon