Tokyo Disneyland – new pricing Case analysis A summary for the board of the company Team of consultants: Desislava Dobreva‚ Georgi Stamenov‚ Toma Koleliev‚ Yavor Kolevski Strategic Management‚ Prof. Dr. Richard Mischak MBA‚ AUBG‚ 2014 19/03/2014 Agenda: I. Executive Summary II. Introduction III. Main body of the report IV. Conclusions and recommendations V. List of references and bibliography VI. Appendices I. Executive Summary Tokyo Disneyland considerations regarding the
Premium Magic Kingdom
Summary Tokyo Disneyland was opened to the public on April 15‚ 1983. This amusement park was owned and operated by an unrelated Japanese corporation. The Walt Disney Company received royalties‚ paid in Yen‚ on certain revenues generated by Tokyo Disneyland. This new overseas business venture was bringing some concern about the foreign exchange risk to Disney. The management team at the Disney has been considering hedging future Yen inflows from Disney Tokyo since 1985. Mr. Anderson
Premium The Walt Disney Company Foreign exchange market Walt Disney
Walt Disney: 1 A more creative organizational chart compared to other http://www.atissuejournal.com/2009/08/07/walt-disney%E2%80%99s-creative-organization-chart/ They use change management and innovative techniques to be the top corporation they are today.After all Disneyland was originally created as a place for his employees and their children to come and relax. 2 Behavioural concepts: Training of walt disney http://voices.yahoo.com/the-magic-disneys-organizational-behavior-concepts-550698
Premium Walt Disney Parks and Resorts The Walt Disney Company Disneyland Resort
INFORMATION NOTE Tokyo Disneyland: Some Basic Facts 1. Background 1.1 Tokyo Disneyland opened on 15 April 1983 at a cost of US$1.4 billion. It is located on a reclaimed site about 10 km from downtown Tokyo. Tokyo Disneyland is privately owned by Oriental Land‚ a land-reclamation company in partnership with Mitsui Real Estate and the Keisei Railway Company. 1.2 Talks between Disney and Oriental Land started in the early 1970’s. Basically‚ Oriental Land is the owner and licensee; Disney is the designer
Premium Revenue Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Magic Kingdom
Executive Summary Evidence from this case suggests that the traditional Japanese corporate governance stance has started to shift in order to include some elements of the Anglo-American way of corporate governance. It appears that a final decision has been made to build Disney Sea Park (despite unattractive ARR‚ but attractive NPV/IRR and ACFR) not only for the potential profits reaped for the company but also due to their responsibility to keep uphold the interests of its stakeholders (which
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Discounted cash flow
proportion of Disney movies). With this positioning statement that applies to everyone regardless of geographic location (Chinese have dreams and can fantasize as much as Americans or Europeans)‚ expansion into the international market may not seem to be a challenge for Walt Disney Company. However‚ in evaluating the past 4 years of attendance and operating figures of their newest park – Hong Kong Disneyland‚ it goes to show that the park performance is far from ideal. Why does the Disney magic not work
Premium The Walt Disney Company Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Walt Disney
known‚ Tokyo Disneyland is theme park which target to customers who looking for entertainment‚ adventures and exciting experiences. How attractive is this industry and how well will Tokyo Disneyland face in the far future in this industry? To analysis and calculate that Porter’s five forces framework is the most efficient method. The five forces are: the threat of entry‚ the threat of substitutes‚ the power of the buyers‚ and the power of suppliers and extent of rivalry (our textbook). In Tokyo Disneyland
Premium Porter five forces analysis Management Torque
and the most effective means of advertising. Disney opened its doors in Japan with much success; much of the success can be attributed to the Japanese culture being very fond of Disney characters. Disney decided to take the same methodology to Paris to open its new park in 1992‚ EuroDisney (Cateora & Graham‚ 2007). Disney failed to realize that while its strategy in Japan worked for Japan‚ its Japan strategy was not going to work in Paris. Disney decided to photo copy their operation and learned
Premium The Walt Disney Company Walt Disney Walt Disney Parks and Resorts
For the exclusive use of H. Thomas‚ 2015. HKU568 MITSURU MISAWA TOKYO DISNEYLAND AND THE DISNEYSEA PARK: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DIFFERENCES IN CAPITAL BUDGETING CONCEPTS AND METHODS BETWEEN AMERICAN AND JAPANESE COMPANIES In the spring of 1997‚ it had been 14 years since Tokyo Disneyland opened its doors for business. Company executives at Japanese Oriental Land Corp. (OL)‚ known to many as the company that brought Disneyland to Japan [see Exhibit 1] were enjoying the success of their well-established
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
Q1: How do Grut & Pfiffer define Tokyo Jane positioning‚ what does TJ brand stand for? The founders of Tokyo Jane want to offer affordable luxury product to their consumer. Grut and Pfiffer has a very vivid idea of how the brand and the product would look like in the mind of consumers‚ however they could not able to depicts the idea to their employee. Tokyo Jane would want to offer good quality and fashionable jewelry as in the high-end fashion display‚ yet accessible for their consumers. “Luxury
Premium Marketing Luxury good Positioning