UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE Business Law I‚ BMGT 380 Midterm Examination This midterm examination is open book‚ open notes‚ but you are on the honor system not to seek assistance from anyone to complete this exam. There are 25 multiple choice questions worth 2 points each and 10 essay questions worth 5 points each‚ for a total of 100 points. Answer all the questions because for the essays partial credit is given where appropriate. Just submit the question number and your answer
Premium Contract
Issues Identified: 1. Whether William has an action in common negligence against Edmund. 2. Whether Sam has action in rescuer’s duty against Edmund 3. Whether William has an action in vicarious liability against TCS 4. Whether Sam has an action in vicarious liability against TCS Pleadings: 1. William v Edmund A. Duty of care Foreseeability – there will be accidents if bus isn’t checked properly and if Edmund doesn’t watch the road. Fair just reasonable. Proximity – safety of William depended
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
possible if ‘prescribed by law’ and ‘necessary to democratic society’ * s.6 HRA 1998 – unlawful for public authority (incl. courts) to act incompatibly to ECHR. * Ovey and White (2006) – Court consistently gives protection to publications/speech‚ it views these as central to the protection of other rights. * Lord Steyn in Reynolds – ECtHR proceeds on fact-specific basis. But nevertheless speech more specifically protected than other forms of expression in law on defamation. Chilling
Premium Tort
Concurrent liability Text [13.45] – [13.65]‚ [13.80] – [13.120] Vicarious liability is the liability of an employer for a tort committed by an employee within the course of employment Stevens v Brodribb sawmilling the existence of control between an employer and employee is not enough to prove a relationship for vicarious liability. Further criteria such as obligation to work‚ hours to work etc is also considered Elazac pty ltd v Sheriff the plaintiff was not an employee but a contractor
Premium Tort law Tort
Mindy Sidwell MG-495 Midterm Exam Student’s Answer Sheet Each Multiple Choice Question is worth 3 points. Please place the letter that corresponds with your answer(a‚ b‚ c‚ d‚ or e) in the appropriate box below. 1. b 14. b 2. a 15. a 3. a 16. a 4. a 17. d 5. c 18. a 6. e 19. e 7. b 20. d 8. a 21. b 9. b 22. c 10. a 23. c 11. a 24. c 12. a 25. b 13. c . . Each
Premium Strategic management Management Forecasting
semester‚ I have been learning about more writing techniques to use for essays. I am trying to get all the skills I can to prepare me for other prompts from now until college. I have learned a fair amount of new things that can help to make my writing better. Now I look to apply these methods to what is given to me and I hope to succeed in my written works. How has your writing improved this semester? Our first legitimate essay in English was about Homer’s The Odyssey. To accomplish this‚ I had to
Premium Homer Odysseus Odyssey
Midterm Review How to Write Business Messages Instructor: Le Dinh Minh Tri Based on: Mary Ellen Guffey‚ Business Communication: Process and Product‚ 5e Guffey’s 3-x-3 Writing Process BC - Spring 2012 Mary Ellen Guffey‚ Business Communication: Process and Product‚ 5e 2 General things to remember • Identify the purpose of each message • Present ideas clearly and concisely. Please avoid a too-long letter • Write a letter from the readers’ perspective‚ not the writers’
Premium Communication Writing Management
land‚ or some right over or in connection with is nuisance (Winfield and Jolowich on tort) examples are noise‚ fumes‚ dust e.t.c. There are 3 different actions in nuisance but the ones of concern are private‚ public and Rylands and Fletcher (strict liability).the objective of nuisance is to protect an individual’s interest in land. The scenario to be analysed below is to advise Banger of his potential liability in tort since the occupier/ controller of the land (country house)‚ and the creator of the
Premium Tort
Rev. 1801 Texas Law Review June‚ 1997 W. Page Keeton Symposium on Tort Law MIXED THEORIES OF TORT LAW: AFFIRMING BOTH DETERRENCE AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE Gary T. Schwartza Copyright (c) 1997 Texas Law Review Association; Gary T. Schwartz Introduction Currently there are two major camps of tort scholars. One understands tort liability as an instrument aimed largely at the goal of deterrence‚ commonly explained within the framework of economics. The other looks at tort law as a way of achieving
Premium Tort Negligence
EUST 1010- Midterm Essay Name: Tsoi Lee Sha Sharon UID: 303 505 0559 What is the difference between the liberal and socialist interpretation of equality? Socialism refers to a myriad of ideologies that the distribution of wealth and property are under the control of the government or the community. It also refers to a broad array of political movements aiming at reaching social and economic equality and cooperation. The word liberal is derived from the Latin liber that means free and
Premium Political philosophy Liberalism Conservatism