LAW FOR ENGINEERS (UEEG 2113) Final Exam questions (2011) Time – 3 hours Students are required to answer any 4 questions Students are allowed to bring in original and unmarked copy of following statutes into exam hall: - 1. Federal Constitution Contracts Act 1950 Employment Act 1955 (a) The Federal Constitution is the supreme law of Malaysia and‚ inter alia‚ it guarantees fundamental liberties to every citizen. With reference to Article 8 and 10 of the Constitution‚ discuss
Premium Constitution Law Contract
Contract Law Assignment Advise Grab From looking at the facts laid out by Grab regarding the purchase of a sandwich shop‚ it seems that the most likely action is that of misrepresentation. A misrepresentation is defined at common law as "a statement of fact made by one party to the other party‚ which is false. While not necessarily forming a term of the contract‚ is yet one of the main reasons which induces the one party to enter into the contract" and is supported by the Misrepresentation Act
Premium Misrepresentation Tort Common law
Law and morality Both law and Morals are well respected as they both often state what should be done in a situation or what a person should and should not do. Laws are often created with morals in mind e:g Abortion Embryo research Capital punishment However during history‚ there have been some areas of law that have clashed with morals Tort law – Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) Lord Aitken ‘Do not harm your neighbour’ The bible is the main source for moral thinking There are some things however that
Free Morality Law Ku Klux Klan
Issue: Whether directors of ABC Bhd had breach their duty as directors. Whether ABC Bhd can persue their claim against any other party related to ABC Bhd. Law: S.4(1) Company Act 1965 (CA1965) states that director includes any person occupying the position of director of a corporation by whatever name called and includes a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of a corporation are accustomed to act and an alternate of substitute director. For example‚ in the case
Premium Contract Tort law Fiduciary
Tyler Womer Sports Law IRAC #1 9/9/14 Case 1: Moose v. MIT Issues: (1) Whether or not the defendants (MIT‚ Coach Taylor‚ & Coach Slovenski) were negligent with respect to their coaching techniques and the equipment they furnished to Garret Moose at the time he was injured. (2) Whether or not the harm was foreseeable. (3) Whether or not MIT was liable for the injured athlete. Rule: The jury found that each defendant‚ as well as the plaintiff‚ was negligent and that the defendants’ negligence
Premium Tort Tort law Law
Junyi Zheng Course MGNT3145 Professor.Toson Date 06/23/2013 Facts Mitsubishi has a contract with Crown Door Company which requires Mitsubishi to sell twelve boxcar loads of plywood to Crown and Mitsubishi should import the wood from Taiwan and deliver it to Crown’s plant in Atlanta.Mitsubishi shipped the wood from Taiwan to Savannah.However‚ in Savannah‚as the railroad was negligent in loading the train which caused the cargo to shift during the trip‚finally the wood got damaged. Issue The
Premium Tort Common law The Damage
2) Is Bright entitled to specific performance because of the unique nature of the goods? Yes‚ the seller should cure the nonconforming goods for the buyer. If the buyer accepts the sellers re-tempt to make another delivery because the nature of the circumstance‚ it would need to be done within the time for performance expires. (UCC 2-508; 2A-513) 4) Hoselton did not have a chance to cure the defects. Is Hoselton correct? No‚ the buyer is given the opportunity to inspect the goods. If problems
Premium Accept Contract Meaning of life
BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT ------------------------------------------------- “To create a binding agreement the acceptance must occur‚ and that ‘acceptance’ must be final and absolutely unconditional. This is clear under Australian contract law.” ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Discuss the accuracy of this statement. In order to discuss the accuracy of this statement we must first understand the concept of ‘acceptance’.
Premium Contract Common law Law
of Contract Reading: George Shenoy and Loo Wee Ling (eds)‚ Principles of Singapore Business Law (“PSBL”)‚ (Cengage 2013)‚ Chapter 18. We will concentrate in class mainly on Damages. Note that PSBL chapter 18 addresses the topics in a different order from this Outline; we will in general follow the order of the Outline Note: References below to Poole are to Jill Poole‚ Casebook on Contract Law (10th ed‚ 2010)‚ which is available at Course Reserve in the Library. References to previous
Premium Contract Law Breach of contract
Eternal Law and Human Law As humans live in this world‚ laws and regulations are strictly enforced for the justice‚ safety‚ and rights of the humans. Whether those laws are eternal or temporal‚ all laws require standards. Saint Augustine’s On the Free Choice of the Will discusses these standards and defines what each laws mean. Most importantly‚ Augustine argues that eternal law is necessary for temporal law to exist and for the nation to function properly. I agree with Augustine’s argument on
Premium Law Human Human rights