pits an employee’s loyalty to the organization against his or her loyalty to the public interest. The justification of whistle-blowing therefore requires an understanding of the duty of loyalty that an employee owes an employer. The Loyal Agent Argument against Whistle-Blowing An employee is an agent of his or her employer. An agent is a person engaged to act in the interest of another person‚ who is known as the principal. Employees are legally agents of their employers. As agents‚ they are
Premium Employment Political terms Law
personally. The argumentation and use of evidence are strong and practicable in this article. The major evidence is based on Goleman’s. Those arguments strongly support for 2 main author’s ideas. One example for this‚ the article infers from Goleman’s list: “people recognizing emotion in other”. Another example is that athour’s problem fully relies on Goleman’s argument. However‚ there are monotonous evidences because the author only uses evidences of Golema but not have diversified evidences of others
Premium Logic Emotion Writing
School Uniforms – Good or Bad? Ever since they were introduced in Victorian times‚ school uniforms have been a contentious subject. In this discussion text I will look at both sides of the argument – why some teachers love them‚ and why most kids don’t. Supporters of school uniform argue that fashionable clothes‚ and arguing about whose clothes are nicer‚ can distract children from their schoolwork. In addition‚ they say that school uniform makes everyone look the same‚ whereas if you let children
Premium Dress code Clothing Uniforms
use of these logical fallacies in the film help strengthen its arguments by making the audience feel as if the corporations are exploiting the farmers and their traditions‚ causing families to go through avoidable obstacles‚ and making the companies and government look like the “bad guys” in this web that is called the food industry. However‚ the reality is that the food industry isn’t as evil as depicted by the fallacious arguments in the film. To begin with‚ the film argues against the corporate
Premium Food Fallacy Critical thinking
on. Discuss requires an answer that explains an item or concept‚ and then gives details about it with supportive information‚ examples‚ points for and against‚ and explanations for the facts put forward. It is important to give both sides of an argument and come to a conclusion. Elucidate requires an answer that explains what something means‚ makes it clear (lucid). Evaluate/Assess require an answer that decides and explains how great‚ valuable or important something is. The judgement should
Premium Logic Critical thinking Question
ASSIGNMENT 1 Submission date 14th November 2014 Where to start? The following text describes the working life of five successful individuals with high levels of job satisfaction. You are asked to read this text and then discuss five questions presented in a table immediately after. You will find each of the assignment questions that you need to address on the left column‚ and the instructions to answer each question on the right column. READ this very carefully as these instructions give
Premium Organizational studies and human resource management Big Five personality traits Argument
Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 The main argument of this paper by Anderson and Reeb is the question whether family ownership is beneficial or detrimental to the future of the company. The arguments against family ownership stress on the points of forgoing profit‚ limited human resource pool‚ usage of company resources for personal reasons and general low company performance. Other researchers attribute benefits to family ownership like greater monitoring
Premium Firm Argument Property
views are built on different arguments‚ it is not surprising that they come to opposing conclusions in their works. A reader needs to juxtapose and analyze both articles in order to form an accurate opinion on the topic of immigration. Legrain is a strong
Premium Argument Illegal immigration Immigration to the United States
worry incessantly about something that has not happened yet? Finally‚ Hester unleashes her tirade on him. William‚ unheeding “…Continued to read his farm paper…” (p 53) Normally when people argue‚ everyone is screaming and upset. William makes this argument one-sided. Hester can scream all she wants‚ but William will continue with his business unmindful of what she says.
Premium Short story Willa Cather Fiction
permissible passive= sometimes permissible Rachels’ argument: 1. active is more humane in some instances passive euthanasia can prolong suffering unnecessarily it is morally acceptable to choose the more humane option 2. the conventional model makes decisions on irrelevant grounds bowel obstruction is irrelevant grounds to make a life or death decision 3. conventional makes no moral distinction between killing and letting die 4. most common arguments in favor of passive euthanasia are invalid medical
Premium Medical ethics Terri Schiavo case Logic