IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION‚ PRETORIA CASE NO: CC113-2013 DATE: 2014-09-11‚ 12 In the matter between THE STATE and OSCAR LEONARD CARL PISTORIUS Accused BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE MASIPA ASSESSORS: ADV J HENZEN DU TOIT ADV T MAZIBUKO ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: ADV GERRIE C NEL ADV ANDREA JOHNSON ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENCE: ADV BARRY ROUX SC ADV KENNY OLDWAGE INTERPRETERS: MS F HENDRICKS JUDGMENT VOLUME 42 (Page 3280 - 3351) iAfrica
Premium
Case study Chimel vs. California Citation 395 u.s.752 1969 Facts: There was a warrant for an offender who supposedly robbed a coin shop. Two officers decided to locate the offender’s house where they meet the offender’s wife. Having a conversation the two officers ask the offender wife can they come inside the house and which she agreed to? Waiting for the offender who committed the crime shows up minutes later. After the offender recognizes that they were two police officers at his home
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States United States Constitution
There are other assumptions were made by his lawyer‚ and family. For example‚ Crowe negotiated a plea deal with the D.A. because she assumed that there are no chances of winning the case. On the other hand‚ Naz’s family assumed that the drugs may be affected on Naz and led him to kill Andrea. However‚ both those assumptions turned out to be incorrect by the end of the show. Stone assumed that there must be other evidence that proves Naz’s innocence‚ which turned to be right. What biases‚ heuristics
Premium
G.R. No. 118295 May 2‚ 1997 WIGBERTO E. TAÑADA and ANNA DOMINIQUE COSETENG‚ as members of the Philippine Senate and as taxpayers; GREGORIO ANDOLANA and JOKER ARROYO as members of the House of Representatives and as taxpayers; NICANOR P. PERLAS and HORACIO R. MORALES‚ both as taxpayers; CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION‚ NATIONAL ECONOMIC PROTECTIONISM ASSOCIATION‚ CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES‚ LIKAS-KAYANG KAUNLARAN FOUNDATION‚ INC.‚ PHILIPPINE RURAL RECONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT‚ DEMOKRATIKONG
Premium World Trade Organization International trade General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
version of the feedback report almost 2 months after the survey was administered (Swanson & Zuber‚ 1996). • What do you think was done well in the administration of the survey in this case? What do you think should have been done differently? • Was a survey a good choice for a data gathering method in this case? Why or why not? 117 118 ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT W ith a formal and psychological contract successfully established‚ a data gathering strategy is developed to further
Premium Interview
Facts: The Negro plaintiffs in these cases were denied admission schools attended by the white children under the laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race. All the court adhered to the “separate but equal” doctrine and held that the plaintiffs were not admitted to the white schools (except for the plaintiff in the Delaware case). In the instant cases‚ the plaintiffs contend that segregated public schools are not “equal” and they are deprived of the equal protection of the laws.
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brown v. Board of Education
1. Why was the Crippen case important? It was a landmark case‚ and the first trial by the media‚ it was known for being the crime of the century‚ and the first to be dominated by forensic science. 2. What was Crippen accused of? Why was he accused of this crime? He was accused for poisoning and dismembering his own wife. 3. Why do you think people were so interested in Crippen’s case? It was a rare case where the victim was poisoned and then cut up. 4. Why was forensic science important
Premium Forensic science Victim Sherlock Holmes
Pepsi Cola Products Philippines‚ Inc. (petitioner) v. Honorable Secretary of Labor (respondents) 1. Facts: a. June 1990: The Pepsi-Cola Employees Organization-UOEF (Union) filed a petition for certification election with the Med-Arbiter seeking to be the exclusive bargaining agent of supervisors of Pepsi-Cola Philippines‚ Inc. (PEPSI). i. Med-Arbiter granted this stating that PCEU-UOEF was an affiliate of Union de Obreros Estivadores de Filipinas (or the Federation) with two (2) rank and file
Premium Trade union Collective bargaining Employment
Case #4 Fighting Grime (Clorox Company) This is a fun case in that it involves branded products that students will recognize yet probably do not associate with Clorox. A good way to introduce the case could be to bring in product samples or show the brand names of their many products and ask students what they have in common? The case is short and vivid and can be assigned ahead or simply read in class. It is an easy case to grasp quickly yet provides some very clear examples of strategic
Premium Strategic management
Case Name: South East Asian Economic Crisis An economic crisis‚ which erupted in Thailand in mid-1997 and which soon spread to neighbouring countries—Malaysia‚ Indonesia‚ Philippines and South Korea— came to be popularly referred to as South-East Asian economic crisis (although South Korea is in East Asia and only the other countries are in South East Asia). A currency Crisis shows up when there is a speculative attack on the exchange rate‚ resulting in a devaluation of a pegged currency or sharp
Premium Southeast Asia Asia Malaysia