2. Decision has to be taken in favor of Perry. In this case‚ Alice was a dual agent. When representing two principals it is likely the interest of one party was to suffer. Alice has breached her fiduciary to both Perry and David. After Perry discovered that David employed Alice he had the right to rescind. 8. In this case there are judgment for Timothy assuming that a lawyer acting reasonably would have had the opportunity to realize the revised statute of limitations period. As an agent‚ Cynthia
Premium Law Court Appeal
There is a thing known as a jury trial process that is supposed to happen in every jury trial case. Although‚ not followed perfectly in the jury trial of Carl Lee it is followed pretty well for a movie. The jury trial process is as follows; a crime is commited‚ an investigation is conducted‚ a warrant is issued‚ then the arrest is made‚ once arrested the criminal is booked‚ then they have their bail hearing. Following the bail hearing the preliminary arraignment happens these are when the informal
Premium Jury Grand jury Jury trial
Moon v Whitehead (2015)‚ is a case dealing with the tort of trespass to person: battery. The appellant‚ Moon‚ appealed the decision of the trial court on the basis of consent. Moon claimed he received adequate consent from the respondent‚ Whitehead‚ while the two were in Sydney attending a work conference. He and the respondent shared an apartment with separate bedrooms for the period of the conference. The respondent pleaded that on 13 August 2007 the appellant came into her bedroom uninvited and
Premium Law Appeal Jury
Post War Trials of WWII Justice can be defined as “the quality of being just; righteousness‚ equitableness‚ or moral rightness” (Dictionary.com). Many people are not well-educated about the trials that occurred after the second world war‚ even though they were responsible for permanently eliminating Nazism and punishing the other horrific world powers at the time. At the time‚ this also included Japan‚ who is another main focus of this essay. The postwar trials of WWII tried many criminals and sentenced
Premium Nuremberg Trials World War II Nazi Germany
Small Claims Courts in the Philippines Going to court for a small sum of money has just become cheaper and faster with the establishment of small claims courts. A simple procedure makes it easy for everyone. According to former Court Administrator‚ now Supreme Court Associate Justice Jose P. Perez‚ 70% of cases before Metropolitan Trial Courts in Metro Manila are small claims (involving small amounts of money) and many of the litigants in these cases are poor. The same thing is true‚ if not more
Premium Court Dispute resolution Lawyer
What is meant by double-blind‚ randomized controlled trial? Explain why such trials are used in psychological research with reference to one specific‚ published psychological experiment. Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold level standard of proof of many research techniques where treatments and therapies are concerned by the scientific community. A study in which participants are allocated at random to receive one of several treatments testing the effectiveness of psychological
Premium Placebo Pharmacology Clinical research
Explain the hierarchy of courts in Malaysia. Discuss in details. Law is defined as any system of regulations to govern the conduct of the people of a community‚ society or nation. It is the governmental response to society ’s need for both regularity‚ consistency and justice based upon collective human experience. A statute‚ ordinance‚ or regulation enacted by the legislative branch of a government and signed into law‚ or in some nations created by decree/judgement without any democratic process
Premium Judge Malaysia Law
Salem Witch Trials is one of the most controversial periods in the U.S. history. The event occurred in the colonial Massachusetts between February 1692 and May 1693. Nearly 200 people who lived in Salam village were accused of practicing witchcraft or the magic of devil‚ nineteen persons were hanged and one person was pressed to death by heavy stones. Finally‚ the colony confessed mistaken and guilty. More importantly‚ they passed a bill restoring the rights and good names for those who were accused
Premium Salem witch trials Witchcraft
Case Study 3: Casey Anthony Trial Luis Morales Curtis Bunch CIS417 2/22/15 In the year of 2011‚ Casey Anthony pleads not guilty for the charges put on her for the murder of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee Anthony’s (Casey Anthony Trial‚ 2011). It all started when Casey’s grandmother had called 911 reporting that her granddaughter was missing and that her daughter’s truck smelled like a dead body (Casey Anthony Trial‚ 2011). In a long story short Caylee’s skeletal remains were found near Casey’s
Premium Computer forensics Jury Search engine optimization
Salem Witch Trials In the years 1692 to 1693 there was an unruly and unjustified cause stirring in the air and surrounding areas in a colony in Massachusetts where more than two hundred innocent colonials were accused of practicing and holding events in the name of evil and in events in witchcraft and twenty were executed. Called the devil’s magic‚ witchcraft was being seen nothing other than one whom holds innocents and a grudge of one whom was innocent of this misjudgment. Most of the
Premium Salem witch trials