DOLORES B. GUICO‚ ET AL.‚ plaintiffs and appellants vs. PABLO G. BAUTISTA‚ ET. AL.‚ defendants and appellees. Facts: • The petitioner in this case filed a case of partition despite the existence of debts of the decedent. Issue: The petitioner urges that their action for partition and liquidation may be maintained‚ notwithstanding that there are pending obligations of the estate‚ subject to the taking of adequate measures either for the payment or the security of its creditors. Is
Free Property Property law Inheritance
There were two court cases that we were given to look at. The first court case was Darling vs. Charleston Community Hospital. According to McWay‚ this case was on a male football player that got injured during a game and was brought to the emergency room where they determined at the hospital that his left leg was broken and a doctor that did not have any experience with putting a cast on put the cast on wrong and then left it on for fourteen days (McWay‚ 2015‚ pg.78). I think the biggest mistake
Premium United States Appeal Jury
of his non-compete with appellee). As a result of the violation of the non-compete agreement‚ appellee petitioned the trial court for a temporary and permanent injunction and damages. The trial court granted the temporary injunction. Appellant is now appealing this decision. ISSUE: In what circumstances will a covenant not to compete be upheld? HOLDING: The Appellate Court ruled in favor of appellant and held that (1) the covenant not to compete does not protect a legitimate interest of appellee;
Premium Contract Employment Trial court
C.A. No. 299 March 18‚ 1946 FELIX ADAN‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ vs. AGAPITO CASILI and VICTORIA ADAN‚ defendants-appellees. OZAETA‚ J.: The plaintiff Felix Adan commenced this action in the Court of First Instance of Camarines Sur against his sister Victoria Adan and the latter’s husband‚ Agapito Casili‚ to secure the judicial partition of the estate left by their deceased mother‚ Simplicia Nepomuceno‚ alleged to consist of six parcels of land which are specifically described in
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Complaint
conduct these witch-hunts are often searching for something that does not exist. A witch-hunt is conducted to project one’s own sin on another person‚ or group of people. To conduct a witch-hunt is to deny all morality. The case of the Amanda Knox Trial is perhaps one of the best examples of a witch-hunt. Amanda Knox‚ a 20 year old American girl‚ was charged with the crime of murdering one of her roommates‚ 21 year old Meredith Kercher. Knox’s boyfriend at the time‚ Raffaele Sollecito was also convicted
Premium Salem witch trials The Crucible Witchcraft
with the difficult‚ albeit‚ all too familiar tale of another family imbroglio over the estate of a decedent.3 This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court‚ assailing the Decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 74949‚4 reversing the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)‚ Branch 78‚ Malolos‚ Bulacan‚ in Special Proceeding Case No. 117-M-95.5 Before anything else‚ we disentangle the facts. On June 4‚ 1990‚ the decedent‚ Cristina Aguinaldo-Suntay
Premium Marriage Inheritance Family law
CIVIL COURTS It is important to understand the differences between civil cases and criminal cases. Since civil cases cover a wide range there cannot be a very specific definition which will cover all of them‚ but a basic definition for civil claims is to say that these arise when an individual or a business believes that their rights have been infringed in some way. Some of the main areas of civil law are: * contract law‚ * law of tort‚ * family law‚ * employment law‚ * company
Premium Common law Jury Law
for using these different types of laws. The paper also discusses the different types of courts where these laws are enforced which include different types of federal and state courts. The main federal courts discussed are the Court of International Trade and the federal court of appeals. Some of the types of state courts discussed are traffic courts‚ small claims courts‚ trial courts‚ and appellate courts. In addition‚ this paper also talks about how law played a part in a previous job position
Premium Law Appeal Trial court
breach of an express warranty by the defendant. The acquired good did not perform. A jury in the state of Kansas found in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals the decision. Facts: A suit was filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against the defendant for breach of an express warranty under Kansas law‚ the plaintiff claim that the item that was acquired failed to perform‚ the jury deliberated that the plaintiff should receive damages‚ and yes it was
Premium Law Warranty Appeal
in the federal court system. Federal courts consist of three levels of courts. District courts are the federal courts of original jurisdiction‚ the U.S. Court of Appeals is the intermediary appellate court‚ and the U.S. Supreme Court is the highest federal court. There are 94 district courts and 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals. Those dissatisfied with the outcome of a case heard from the district courts can take it to the U.S. Court of Appeals. Cases are brought to the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Appeal