Lenin‚ a Red Tsar? It is widely accepted that Lenin was to be the next Tsar of the time‚ The Red Tsar in fact. With his views gradually growing more radical‚ this can be seen to be true in a lot of instances. Lenin was a key figure in European history. Lenin led the Bolsheviks to overthrow the Russian Tsar‚ and to bring socialism to Russia. Lenin introduced Communism to Russia. This changed the history for Russia as well as the rest of Europe‚ and to this day has had a huge effect on the Russian
Free Marxism Socialism Russia
Conditions under the Tsar Russia used to be ruled by the Tsars Before February 1917‚ Russia was ruled by the Tsars and the Royal Family were the Romanovs. The Tsarist system was an autocracy (ruled by one person). Tsar was ruled by decree‚ his word was law. USSR’s Population was very diverse(variety; very different ) Russia was a multi-national and multi religious state. Most of russias population was Russian but there were significant minorities including Ukrainians‚ Fins‚ Poles and Georgians
Premium Russia Soviet Union Russian Empire
defined the Tsar as the absolute ruler; highlighting the beginning of Russia’s political backwardness in an epoch where all major western countries were forming democratic and representative government. Russia was a state ruled by oppression and operated by a denial of free speech; leading often to extremism; and with a resented Russification system‚ the government control was deteriorating. The social structure of Russia was built up through an autocratic pyramid classification; the Tsar with dominant
Premium Russian Empire Russia Alexander II of Russia
Why did opposition to Alexander II grow in the 1870’s? During 1870’s opposition towards Alexander II arose because of two reasons‚ one of which was his sudden reactionary attitude after an assassination attempt in 1866. As a result of this event‚ Alexander‚ who was at the time strongly influenced by conservatives‚ saw a reason for his unpopularity the western aspects he brought to Russia by his liberal reforms and therefore removed all liberal ministers he appointed before and replaced them with
Free Russia Russian Empire Vladimir Lenin
window and climbed in. It was shocking in there. Literally. There was lights and candles up above and gold up to the horizon of our eyes. We walked beside paintings of the Tsars‚ among the likes of Peter the Great‚ who founded the Empire. Seeing Alexander II‚ who freed the slaves‚ but didn’t do enough. And at the end‚ we saw Nicholas II‚ who caused the war and the famines. We ripped the painting of him off of the warm-colored walls and stabbed it with our bayonets. I reacted‚ “He is not God’s representative
Premium Saint Petersburg Winter Palace Alexander II of Russia
The Russians needed to guarantee that while they lost the war despite everything they exited the Congress of Paris with some quality left in their realm and with some of their wartime belonging left under their territory. At the point when Alexander II took the crown of Russia in 1855 he acquired a potential emergency that debilitated to fall the Russian Empire. Issues all through the Empire extending from parts of Finland to Poland‚ and also Crimea and numerous innate clashes extended the Russian
Premium Russia Russian Empire World War II
ALEXANDER THE GREAT It is hard to provide an exact definition of leadership‚ courage‚ & heroism because every person has his own opinion. The qualities a leader possesses are not always the same; they can vary according to the time in history he lived in‚ the problems that are occurring throughout that time period‚ and also the people whom the leader is leading. Alexander’s childhood played an important role in his development into a great man & military Leader. Many things of his childhood contributed
Premium Leadership Philip II of Macedon Alexander the Great
terms of both personality and policies‚ Alexander III did not posses the qualities necessary for a successful ruler of late 19th-century Russia” – to what extent to you agree with this judgement? Whilst the judgement could be considered well-founded‚ its validity is a matter of opinion‚ depending on how one defines the qualities of a ‘successful ruler’ of Russia in the late 1800s‚ which policies contribute to this success and what‚ overall‚ makes a Tsar a success or a failure (if the matter
Free Russia Russian Empire Autocracy
Important Nineteenth Century Guys Charts Note: Legacies are gone into detail in the charts Tsar Alexander II Positives | Negatives | * Introduced emancipation edict‚ gave the right to peasants to own land‚ marry their own choice‚ bring suits to court. * Peasants were given their own land. * Zemstvos (local assemblies) were put in place by Alexander‚ they could levy taxes and took charge over matters of education‚ famine‚ public projects * Local and provincial courts were made. *
Premium Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Alexander II of Russia British Empire
was a History of lost opportunities by the Tsar and his Ministers’. Assess the validity of this statement. In the setting up of the first duma the tsar and his ministers had the opportunity to meet the demands of the people without having to lose any authority or change the system that was already in place too drastically‚ he also could have given the people representation that they so desperately wanted. The events of Bloody Sunday made the Tsar and his governments sit up and listen to the
Premium Russia Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia