You have to be certain that the evidence proves the defendant guilty. So in the case of court doubt is more powerful than certainty is. As certain as the other jurors were about the kid being guilty the doubt of Juror 8 saved the kids life. In 12 Angry Men at the beginning of the case only juror 8 truly saw the reasonable doubt in this case‚ so he was doing the proper thing voting not guilty. At first there was the evidence of the knife being one of a kind which juror 8 proved wrong by have an exact
Premium
Journal #2 In class we talked about the sub-disciplines of epistemology. There are three which are empiricism‚ rationalism and skepticism. Out of these three I feel that I‚ myself am an empiricist. I feel this because everything I have learned in my short life up to this point has been through some type of experience in my life involving one or more of the five senses. I was trying to think of a case where I may have knowledge of something without someone telling me or showing me and I couldn’t
Premium Taste Sense Empiricism
Authors of poems 12 Angry Men and “Democracy” ‚ Rose and Hughes agree on the importance of democracy. While Hughes is contributing that Democracy although is a fair way of government‚ it is not present in our everyday lives. Rose suggests that Democracy is a smart‚ fair way of government but shows how it is present in his drama and that people should take advantage of its perks and freedom that other forms of government don’t have. What is a Democracy you may ask? Well‚ Democracy is truly
Premium Democracy Government Political philosophy
Meno’s Paradox A paradox is a true statement or group of statements that leads to a contradiction or situation‚ which defies intuition (Wikipedia). In Plato’s Meno‚ Meno and Socrates engage in the typical Socratic elenctic method of examination pertaining to the topic of virtue. Socrates helps Meno reach a state of learned ignorance. After reaching this state‚ Meno presents his paradox to Socrates. Socrates‚ in philosophical fashion‚ examines the statement using epistemological evidence to understand
Premium Epistemology Plato Truth
Twelve angry men shows’ that the jury system shows that personal experiences are the strongest feeling to influence human decision making. Discuss Roses play Twelve Angry Men is about a dissenting juror in a murder trial who slowly manages to convince the other jurors that the case they are examining is not as obviously clear as it seemed in court. The defence and the prosecution have rested and the jury is filling into the jury room to decide if a young sixteen year old ethnic boy is guilty or
Premium
12 Angry Men In 12 Angry Men by Henry Fonda and Reginald Rose a young man charged with the murder of his father‚ is in the hands of twelve men all with entirely diverse views. After hearing‚ the case the jurors go into discussions. Eleven of the twelve men are convinced that the boy murdered his father. However‚ Juror #8‚ Davis (Henry Fonda). Doesn’t necessarily believe the boy is guilty‚ rather wants to explore the evidence and discuss the trial further. Davis‚ was the most important juror in
Premium Man Men Boy
Introduction Prior to attending the Women’s Studies 5363 Feminist/Womanist Epistemology class‚ I did not have a clear understand of the distinction between epistemology and methodology. After taking this class‚ my understanding is much clearer. Epistemology‚ the philosophy of knowledge or the study of knowledge and belief‚ is concerned with creation of knowledge‚ conditions of knowledge‚ sources of knowledge‚ structure of knowledge‚ limits of knowledge‚ and the distribution of knowledge. Methodology
Premium Epistemology Scientific method Philosophy
examining the evidence. As the play opens we learn the accused is facing a murder charge‚ after allegedly stabbing his father in the chest with a knife. The accused is from a rough part of town‚ and lives in an apartment complex. In Reginald Rose’s 12 Angry Men‚ the jury shows extreme bias‚ basing claims off of little to no evidence. The jury makes assumptions about the accused’s character‚ which shows bias. The jury was discussing the accused’s past‚ what he may have
Premium
Standpoint epistemology developed from the recognition of the lack of women in major political roles. Feminists argued that politics and international relations is conducted largely from male perspectives and male interests. In order to make the worth of women’s lives more visible‚ it is necessary to evaluate it from their point of view. Standpoint feminism claims that feminist politics should be practiced from the standpoint of women or particular groups of women[1] . Some scholars for example Dorothy
Premium Sociology Gender Feminism
Guilt By Association The first fallacy is an example of Guilt by Association (no Latin name). Guilt by Association is when a stereotype is used as evidence to support an argument. The character who committed this fallacy in Twelve Angry Men was the Stockbroker. The Stockbroker said‚ “He is from a slum. Slums are breeding grounds for criminals.” The Stockbroker committed a fallacy when he brought up the fact that the accused man is from the slums because his argument was that this would give him
Premium Jury Critical thinking Fallacy