the movie of 12 angry men was especially juror number 8 and the old man juror 9‚ also juror number 6. The reason i liked juror number 8 is because‚ juror 8 didn’t agree guilty right away just like the other jurors‚ number 8 really wanted to explain why everyone voted guilty. He didn’t right away think that the kid was really a murderer‚because of the father as the court had said that the father was abusive and that the kid was everywhere as an orphan but so long to be beaten‚ number 8 thought after
Premium Jury Not proven Trial
The film "12 Angry Men"‚ involves many social psychology concepts. In this report‚ I explain my understanding of this film from a social psychological (PSYCHO 241) standpoint. Firstly‚ 11/12 jurors acted as cognitive misers‚ leading to heuristic thinking due to a lack of time‚ importance‚ and information. These men used the representative heuristic by utilizing their schema of "slum kids" as a prototype. They also used the availability heuristic as media portrays these children in a bad light. Ultimately
Premium Jury Morality Ethics
instructions to the jury. The twelve men must determine‚ unanimously‚ whether the accused is innocent or guilty of the charge of murder. These twelve then move to the jury room‚ where they begin to become acquainted with the personalities of their peers. Throughout their deliberation‚ not a single juror knows another by his name. In a preliminary vote they are startled to find that one juror has voted "not guilty." Many of the jurors are amazed and disturbed because Juror #8 (played by Fonda)‚ the lone
Free Jury Not proven Logic
TWELVE ANGRY MEN A three act play written by Reginald Rose’s. Twelve angry men is a dramatic story of a difficult jury just trying to reach a verdict. Most of the jury are thinking not guilty but the few jurors are hung on guilty with a few important pieces of evidence and clues it goes back and forth through the whole book. When the majority of the jury gets the few to change their mind the truth of being not guilty or guilty never is revealed. Act One explains the layout of twelve angry men. This
Premium Jury Not proven Crime
A Behavioural analysis of “12 Angry Men” with light on Decision Making by Sai Jayanth Madhu The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is an examination of the dynamics at play in a jury room in the in The United States. The action revolves around the opinions‚ perceptions‚ reason and logic of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide. The extraordinary weightage of their decision is that their finding will determine his life or death
Premium Critical thinking Jury Bias
‘”Twelve Angry Men” illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals reaching a life-or-death decision.’ Discuss The American justice system is intended to be fair and unbiased. It is founded on the ideal that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty‚ and ensures the duty of proving a dispute charge rests with the prosecution. However this system has inevitable flaws as every individual’s beliefs‚ values and morals are affected by their own experiences and factors
Premium Jury Common law Verdict
12 Angry Men 12 Angry Men depicts how a jury of twelve men must examine the evidence presented at the trial of a young boy accused of murdering his father. The evidence brought forth in the trial is the testimony of an old man who lives in the apartment about the boy’s‚ a switchblade knife‚ the boy’s sketchy alibi‚ and the eyewitness testimony of a woman who lives across from the boy’s apartment building. With the evidence making the boy appear guilty‚ a single juror questions the accuracy of
Premium Jury Critical thinking Evidence
In analyzing 12 Angry Men the first theory that came to mind is the Universal Theory of Leadership. The theory is defined as the belief that certain personal characteristics and skills contribute to leadership effectiveness in many situations. This shows true with Juror #8. Juror #8 was the architect who emerged as a real effective leader. The architect showed self-confidence and assertiveness. He convinced the jury that once all thought the young man was guilty to believing he was innocent due to
Premium Leadership Not proven Jury
Jeffery Small 11/9/11 Ms. Stephens 310 12 Angry Men Essay In the book “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose‚ a verdict of not guilty was given to the boy after the fact that apparently all the jurors except one thought that the boy was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. All of the key evidence presented in the court was rejected by the jury‚ which led the jurors to have a reasonable doubt about the boy’s guiltiness. This evidence in the book will go by chronological order and support
Premium Jury Not proven Epistemology
Set in the sweltering summer of 1954‚ Reginald Rose’s socially insightful play "Twelve Angry Men"‚ illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals to reach a "life or death" decision with collective states of minds hindered by "personal prejudice". At the conception of the play‚ rose explores the idea that doubt is a harder state of mind than certainty by portraying doubt‚ in the guilt of the boy‚ as a minority view within the courtroom. However‚ as the play progresses
Premium Jury Verdict Not proven