given a choice between two acts the act that benefits the majority should be chosen. Philosophers use the term “utility” to express this idea‚ and “utility” is defined as the “satisfaction one gets from something” (Bowles‚ 2010‚ Section ‘Utilitarianism‚’ Para. 2). When considering whether an act is good or bad using the utilitarian approach one would consider whether the consequence of the act has a positive or negative impact on the majority of those affected. There are pros and cons to using utilitarian
Premium Ethics Virtue ethics Utilitarianism
Monarchy is the rule of one person for the benefit of the city. Aristocracy is the rule of the few‚ best‚ who rule for the benefit of the city. Politeia is the rule of the many for the common benefit of the city. The unjust counterpart to monarchy is tyranny‚ the unjust counterpart to aristocracy is oligarchy‚ and the unjust counterpart to politeia is democracy (Steinberger‚
Premium Democracy United States Government
He was in favor of constitutional checks and worried deeply about “tyranny of the majority” which “leaves fewer means of escape‚ penetrating much more deeply into the details of life‚ and enslaving the soul” (Mill 9). To keep this potential tyranny in check‚ Mill advocates free speech‚ thought‚ and discussion‚ intensely. He institutes the “harm principle”‚ in which citizens have absolute freedom until “[their]
Premium Plato Utilitarianism Ethics
citizens was major. The Supreme Court has played a very important part in preserving the rights (and building them) of minority groups also. Politicians invariably sway their work towards the majority as it is the majority that will vote them back into power. This has been called the "tyranny of the majority" which has meant that the minorities have been left behind in the rush for votes. Chief Justice Marshall argued that there was no other institution in existence that could defend the rights of
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Rights Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Political Science Name: rsonam Donohue Briefs #2 Tuesday‚ March 5 Schenck v. United States 1919 Criminal Case Federal Petitioner: Schenck Respondent: United States Events: During World War I in 1917‚ Congress had passed a law called the Espionage Act which states that during wartime obstructing the draft and trying to make soldiers disloyal or disobedient were crimes. Schenck going against the war‚ mailed thousands
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
that states that each person carries equal weight in the conduct of the public business is known as political equality. 9. What prevents majority tyranny over a minority in most policy decisions in a democracy? The composition of the majority and minority is always shifting‚ depending on the issue. 10. ________was (were) an example of majority tyranny that occurred in the United States. Jim Crow laws 11. The framework advanced by the authors to aid our understanding of American politics
Free Democracy United States Constitution United States
don’t you?) It says‚ "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..." So what? We live in a republic. What difference does it make? It makes all the difference in the world. In a democracy the "majority rules" - and the minority loses. A hypothetical example can demonstrate the idea. Pretend that you’re a land owner‚ and that I would like to buy some of your property. You don’t want to sell this property because it’s been in your family for several
Premium United States Republic Democracy
therefore‚ declare our right and obligation to participate in civil disobedience; that when we see systematic oppression in this growing country‚ we must say something; that when we do‚ we are protecting the minority compelled to stay silent by the majority; that when we knowingly break a tyrannical law‚ we must accept the consequences with grace and dignity; that when we see direct discrimination‚ injustice‚ and oppression against minorities in our country‚ when we see our fellow brothers and sisters
Premium Martin Luther King Jr. Civil disobedience
Locke’s Second Treatise of Government section 131 Introduction In this essay‚ I would like to discuss Locke’s Second Treatise of Government section 131. This essay is divided into four parts. In the first part‚ I would like to interpret what Locke’s position is developed in section 131 and in the next part‚ I would like to discuss how Locke supports this position by tracing back to the origin of government. Then in the third part‚ I would like to point out some flaws in this position by arguing
Free Separation of powers Law Political philosophy
not solve.” In their book Built to Last‚ James C. Collins and Jerry I. Porras discuss how leaders fall prey to “The Tyranny of the Or”‚ the belief that one cannot live with two apparently contradictory ideas at the same time. They found that “The Tyranny of the OR pushes people to believe that things must be either A OR B‚ but not both. Instead of being oppressed by the Tyranny of OR‚ highly visionary companies liberate themselves with the Genius of the AND the ability embrace both extremes of
Premium Problem solving