Under Armour Case Analysis Current Situation: Founded by Kevin Plank in 1996‚ as KP Sports and then later on renamed to Under Armour (logo as UA) has been profitable and well known since the time it was founded. Under Armour rapid growth in very short term has been due to maintaining a competitive advantage by always having top-notch products and adopting new strategies to compete with the rivals. Since 1996‚ company sales‚ profit‚ assets and equity have been increasing. Today Company is not only
Premium Marketing Under Armour New product development
same time they are still producing equipment that rivals the biggest competitors of the business. Not only has Under Armour seen success in their industry‚ but their success Financially has been completely overlooked and underrated. Their value added has ben unbelievable for their shareholders and in the public eye the company has been a fast rising competitor. According to the Under Armour SEC filing February 28 of this year‚ “ Our net revenues have grown to $606.6 million in 2007 from $115.4 million
Premium United States Clothing Marketing
Porter’s analysis of Under Armour Competition in the industry Only a few companies have the sheer size and established distribution channels to compete against UA. The biggest of these competitors are Nike and Adidas. Both these companies have higher market share and total annual sales than UA. Nike’s trailing 12 month sales is over 31billion‚ Adidas’ trailing 12 month sales is over 16billion‚ and UA’s trailing 12 month sales is just under 4billion. Potential of New Entrants Into the Industry
Premium Marketing Brand Athletic shoe
From : Adam‚ Under Armour Junior Analyst To : Kevin A. Plank‚ Under Armour Chairman‚ President‚ and CEO Date : December 18‚ 2011 Subject : Under Armour’s Strong Financial Performance from 2008 to 2010 In order to help Under Armour acknowledge its position within the sport apparel and gear industry‚ I researched and constructed an analysis of the company’s financial performance from 2008 to 2010. Over the last three years‚ Under Armour posted a strong financial performance. From 2008 to 2010‚
Premium Under Armour Kevin Plank Maryland
Organizational Background Analysis: Under Armour‚ Inc. Under Armour was founded in 1996 by former University of Maryland football player‚ Kevin Plank. The company’s main objective is to create high quality performance apparel; their overall mission is to make all athletes better through passion‚ design and the relentless pursuit of innovation. The primary product that the company provides is specially engineered performance apparel‚ made of synthetic fabric‚ which is designed to keep athletes cool
Premium Under Armour Kevin Plank Maryland
Executive Summary 2 1.0 Under Armour Backgroung 1.1Vision Statement 1.2 Mission Statement 1.3 Corporate Philosophy 1.4 Corporate Objectives 1.5 Product Offerings 3 2.0 Market Analysis 2.1 Target Market Profile 2.1.1 Market Segmentation 2.1.2 Market Targeting 2.1.3 Market Positioning 2.2 External Environmental Analysis 2.3 Internal Environmental Analysis 2.4 Summary of SWOT Analysis 4 3.0 Market Recommendation 3.1 Recommended Strategy 5 Reference Executive Summary Under Armour (UA) is an American
Premium Marketing Strategic management Management
Case #5 Under Armour- Challenging Nike In Sports Apparel Shuying‚ Sai 1 Industry & Market: Under Armour was founded in 1996. The founder is Kevin Plank‚ a former football player who played for University of Maryland. At first‚ it started with a simple idea that making sports T-shirt more comfortable when players wear it. After 15 years‚ Under Armour became a big company who already spread their market into different country. In sporting goods market‚ Nike and Adidas are the two industry-leaders.
Premium Sport Revenue Sports equipment
Analysis of the financial data for Under Armour Inc. & Nike Inc. 1. Liquidity | Comparison between Nike & Under Armour | | 2010 | 2009 | Current Ratio | •Both companies have a ratio that is higher than the dangerous 1.0 current ratio.•The current Ratio of Under Armour is a bit higher than Nike`s which means that Under Armour is more efficient in terms of the operating cycle or in other words the ability to turn its products into cash. | •Both companies have a ratio that is higher
Premium Financial ratio Marketing Economics
Rotimi Oyewole December 17‚ 2010 INBM 400 Seminar Final Case Study Under Armour Under Armour is an emerging company in the sports apparel industry whose mission is to “Make all athletes better through passion‚ science and the relentless pursuit of innovation”. Under Armour was a disruptive innovator in the sports apparel industry by creating sports apparel using synthetic materials as an alternative to natural fibers‚ such as cotton. This important change in material resulted in a “shirt
Premium First-mover advantage Strategic management
Executive Summary Under Armour (UA) was the pioneer company that introduced performance apparel with moisture management to keep athletes dry‚ cool‚ and light while practising or competing. Founded in 1996 becoming a public company in 2005‚ UA now competes globally in the multisegment retail market for both sports apparel and active wear‚ though 90% of its sales are in North America. In 2011 UA’s market share was approximately 2.8% compared with Nike at 7.0% and Adidas at 5.4%. UA is in a good
Premium Clothing Under Armour Kevin Plank