Under Armour Case Analysis INTRODUCTION TO THE COMPANY Under Armour is a company that started IN WHAT YEAR in the basement of former University of Maryland football player Kevin Plank‚ but is a now large and very well known company. Under Armour has grown to be one of the top selling brands of athletic wear and is rapidly growing. CENTRAL STRATEGIC ISSUES Even though it is one of the most competitive athletic wear brands in the Unites States‚ there are a few issues that prevent Under Armour
Premium Marketing Brand Athletic shoe
Under Armour Case Analysis Current Situation: Founded by Kevin Plank in 1996‚ as KP Sports and then later on renamed to Under Armour (logo as UA) has been profitable and well known since the time it was founded. Under Armour rapid growth in very short term has been due to maintaining a competitive advantage by always having top-notch products and adopting new strategies to compete with the rivals. Since 1996‚ company sales‚ profit‚ assets and equity have been increasing. Today Company is not only
Premium Marketing Under Armour New product development
the general deduction test under [S 33(1) of the Income Tax Act 1967]. Under the general deduction test the business expenses have to fulfil all the following conditions in order to secure a deduction from the gross income of a business source: 1) it is revenue expenditure wholly and exclusively incurred in the production of income [S 33(1) Income Tax Act 1967] and it is not prohibited from deduction under S39 of the Income Tax Act 1967‚ 2) it is a specific deduction under S 34‚ S 34A or S 34B of the
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Expense Operating expense
of Maryland ‘special team’s captain’ came up with a game-changing the idea to revolutionize athletic-wear. Growing frustrated with having to change‚ and wash cotton tee shirts so frequently‚ Plank came up with the idea for the HeatGear tee shirt. Under Armour’s first product ever‚ developed through extensive research; the HeatGear tee shirt is made from synthetic fabrics designed to be sweat resistant‚ comfortable‚ and reusable. Kevin Plank started his journey in Georgetown‚ Washington DC. Working
Premium Initial public offering Under Armour University of Maryland
same time they are still producing equipment that rivals the biggest competitors of the business. Not only has Under Armour seen success in their industry‚ but their success Financially has been completely overlooked and underrated. Their value added has ben unbelievable for their shareholders and in the public eye the company has been a fast rising competitor. According to the Under Armour SEC filing February 28 of this year‚ “ Our net revenues have grown to $606.6 million in 2007 from $115.4 million
Premium United States Clothing Marketing
Under Armour Case Analysis 1. Five forces analysis for the performance apparel industry Buyer Bargaining Power: High There are a lot of performance apparel companies out on the market‚ which has created a wide variety of product options for customers. With different brands out on the market‚ each one has its own specific style and designs‚ which allows the customers to choose who has the best quality and price. Substitute Products: Low Having a lot of performance apparel companies out on the
Premium Marketing Adidas Management
they had control on the athletic apparel oligopoly‚ but recently‚ Under Armour has become a serious competitor to the two companies. The road to becoming a legitimate competitor has been tough‚ specifically because of the competitive nature existing between firms in the same market. The market structure‚ determinants of supply and demand‚ and future outlook of the company can help us see the state and performance of Under Armour. Under Armour’s market is an example of a monopolistic competition‚ meaning
Premium Marketing Athletic shoe Brand
Porter’s analysis of Under Armour Competition in the industry Only a few companies have the sheer size and established distribution channels to compete against UA. The biggest of these competitors are Nike and Adidas. Both these companies have higher market share and total annual sales than UA. Nike’s trailing 12 month sales is over 31billion‚ Adidas’ trailing 12 month sales is over 16billion‚ and UA’s trailing 12 month sales is just under 4billion. Potential of New Entrants Into the Industry
Premium Marketing Brand Athletic shoe
Under Armour’s accomplishment over the last ten years has been nothing but remarkable. However‚ serious threats to the company growth should be a concern. Under Armour is strongly overlooking the fierce competition in the sports apparel industry that has the potential to seriously hold back the continued success of the company. For instance‚ the marketing strategy of Under Armour should face severe scrutiny as the company delivers a particularly wide-range of products‚ still they only focus on their
Premium United States Marketing Management
Under Armour general and direct environments: The competitive pressures associated with the bargaining power of buyers are moderate. There are two types of buyers: Chain retailers such as Sports Authority‚ and professional athletic teams. These athletic teams do have the power to negotiate the terms of when and where they will use/wear the apparel. Chain retailers have the power to place product where they choose in the store. The competitive pressures associated with the bargaining power of suppliers
Premium Marketing Management Adidas