Many traits are required in order to apply for an executive position. Leadership‚ integrity‚ and intellectuality; all of these are basic traits of a strong leader. One must not be lazy nor cowardly when in such a position of power. One must be prepared to make decisions that may not benefit oneself directly‚ but result in a more efficient and organized company. In the following excerpt you will read about the traits that provide for not only essential chief executive‚ but a successful one as well
Premium Management English-language films Positive psychology
September 16‚ 2006 Worksheet 1 EMPLOYMENT TORTS Employer’s Liability 1. Introduction The basis of the liability of an employer for negligence in respect of injury suffered by his employee during the course of the employee’s work is twofold: 1. He may be liable for breach of the personal duty of care which he owes to each employee; 2. He may be vicariously liable for breach by one employee of the duty of care which that employee owes to his fellow employees. The action against
Premium Employment Tort law Tort
Adams v Lindsell (1818) The defendant wrote to the claimant offering to sell them some wool and asking for a reply ’in the course of post’. The letter was delayed in the post. On receiving the letter the claimant posted a letter of acceptance the same day. However‚ due to the delay the defendant’s had assumed the claimant was not interested in the wool and sold it on to a third party. The claimant sued for breach of contract. Held: There was a valid contract which came in to existence the moment
Premium Contract
according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek‚ pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible‚ or “liable‚” for those injuries. According to the case‚ Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed
Premium Abuse Child abuse Bullying
Tort Reform is this good? Does Tort Reform actually help us‚ the consumers from Corporate America putting profits over us? Does Tort Reform help with safer products? Should there be limits to punitive damages? Is Tort Reform good? There are people that insist it is and there are those like myself that believe Tort Reform is another way to take yet‚ another right away from us. Allow me to begin by defining Tort Reform. Tort is a personal legal wrong doing and Reform is to make changes in order to
Premium Law Tort Common law
state’s laws was simply not a certainty upon which a citizen could rely. In the early most attempts at tort reform in the State of Texas‚ a well-respected University of Texas Law School professor was asked to spearhead a commission and make recommendations on how to fix the those judicial inequalities.
Premium
Tort law in environmental regulations Actions brought under tort law are amongst the oldest of the legal remedies to abate pollution. Most pollution cases in tort law fall under the categories of nuisance‚ negligence or strict liability.1 The rules of Tort law in India were introduced under British rule. Initially‚ disputes arising within the presidency towns of Calcutta‚ Madras and Bombay were subjected to common law rules.2 Later‚ Indian courts outside the presidency were required by Acts of the
Premium Tort Common law
Blake v. Barnard 1840 A man put his gun at the head of another and said‚ ’Be quiet or I blow your brain out’. No assault. If the person did what he is told nothing would happen. Contrast: READ v. CROKER (1853). Byrne (Canada) 1968 Canada Supreme Court A man went into a bank. Having a jacket over his hand‚ he said: I have a gun‚ give me the money or I shoot. No assault. He did not show the gun. Persuasive precedent. Janvier v. Sweeny 1919 Court of Appeal Private detectives tried
Premium Tort Tort law
PRESENTATION ON CASE. Paul‚ a contractor‚ owned a corner shop where he ran a news agent stand and a tobacconist business. Neil advertised the business and premises for sale. Having seen the advertisement‚ Jenny visited the premises from which she lived 20 minutes away and was told by Paul that the purchase would be the best bargain in town and that the profits were 40‚000 pounds per annum‚ and that if she didn’t believe him she should look at the accounts which she declined but had she done so
Premium Misrepresentation Contract law
Tattooed Need Not Apply English 092 June 18‚ 2009 Tattooed Need Not Apply “Deborah Connor‚ a clerk at the Hub Folding Box Co.‚ sued her employer for gender discrimination and retaliation. Although a male employee was not required to cover his Navy tattoo‚ Connor was told to cover a heart-shaped tattoo on her forearm or be terminated. The company was concerned that customers who saw Connor ’s tattoo would have a negative reaction because a tattoo on a woman ‘symbolized that she was
Premium Discrimination Freedom of speech Trousers