To: Senior Partner From: Paralegal Re: Natalie Attired Legal Memorandum #12345 Date: April 10‚ 2012 Issues 1. Was Natalie’s Tattoo really going to cause the “more mature” clientele to be “appalled and disgusted” and wanting to be waited on by another waitress? 2. Does Ms. Baker have anything in writing at the time of her firing Ms. Attired? 3. Was Natalie Attired’s unemployment benefits rightfully terminated? Brief answers 1. According to Ms. Baker‚ Natalie’s tattoo would lead to a decline
Premium Law Legal terms Human rights
MEMORANDUM To:Senior Partner From: Arisleyda Bonetti Date: February 16‚ 2015 Re: Our new client Natalie Attired; denial of unemployment benefits for alleged misconduct FACTS Natalie Attired would like to know if she has a claim against the NMESB for wrongfully withholding her unemployment benefits. Ms. Attired was employed with Biddy’s Tea House and Croissanterie. Ms. Biddy evaluated the waitresses’ performance every three months‚ and received four evaluations while she worked there. Also
Premium Employment Unemployment Clothing
Memorandum To: Senior Partner From: Deidra Howard Date: July 15‚ 2015 Subject: Natalie Attired Unemployment Compensation Claim. Facts: July 2010‚ Ms. Natalie Attired filed and was denied unemployment compensation benefits on the grounds of “misconduct”. May 2009‚ Ms. Attired began employment with Biddy’s Tea House where she received work performance evaluation every 3 months during her time of employment. Ms. Attired received a total of four evaluations (attached)‚ which showed constant improvement
Premium Employment Termination of employment
TO: Alexis Schlamberg FROM: RE: Natalie Attired Case DATE: November 19‚ 2013 Statement of the Facts Natalie Attired‚ 23‚ was fired from her position as a waitress at Biddy’s Teahouse for having a visible tattoo. The owner‚ Biddy Baker fired Miss Attired because she would not remove the tattoo and feared that an employee having a tattoo that was visible would upset her more “mature” patrons‚ which would affect profits. No documentation could be provided that showed a loss of profits
Premium Law Employment Common law
Legal Memorandum PA 205 Final Project By: Jazmin Howard To: XXXXXXX From: XXXXX Date: July 15‚ 2014 Re: Natalie Attired v. New Mexico Employment Security Board Memorandum of Law Statement of Facts: In July of 2010‚ the Plaintiff‚ Natalie Attired‚ filed for unemployment with the New Mexico Employment Security Board; her claim was denied and she was deemed ineligible due to being terminated for misconduct. In June of 2010‚ Plaintiff Natalie Attired was fired from her job at Biddy’s
Premium Employment New Mexico Unemployment
PA205: Introduction to Legal Analysis and Writing Prof: Wendi Cline Kaplan University January 17‚ 2015 By‚ Heather Leigh Bradley Natalie Attired Case Memorandum: To: Senior Partner From: Heather Bradley Re: Attired v. New Mexico Department Labor Employment Security Department‚ Board of Review Date: 01/17/2015 Statement of Facts: Natalie Attired was employed at Biddy’s as a waitress. Biddy’s evaluates waitress’ performance every three months. Natalie received
Premium Employment Termination of employment New Mexico
MEMORANDUM TO: Senior Partner FROM: Paralegal RE: Natalie Attire DATE: July 3‚ 2013 QUESTION PRESENTED Did Natalie Attire act in a professional manner when she got the full length tattoo on her arm‚ and was she rightfully terminated from her job because of the incident? BRIEF ANSWER Ms. Attire had asked another waitress at the establishment‚ when she should have went straight to her supervisor (Ms. Biddy Baker) and asked about getting a tattoo that would take up the
Premium Termination of employment Early childhood education New Mexico
Internal Legal Memorandum and Analysis in Ima Shewin’s Case Taressa Wise Kaplan University PA 402-01 Professor Carolyn Dragseth June 5‚ 2012 LEGAL M E M O R A N D U M TO: Carolyn Dragseth‚ Attorney FROM: Taressa Wise‚ Legal Analyst DATE: June 5‚ 2012 RE: Legal Memorandum‚ causes of action for presenting a prima facie case for Ima Shewin
Premium Sexual harassment Discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Final Written Assignment 9 Internal Legal Memorandum of Law MEMORANDUM TO: Chief Prosecuting Attorney FROM: DATE: December 4‚ 2010 RE: Charging Bob and Susan Tuttle of Negligent Supervision Question Presented Did Joseph Haney effectively simulate a deadly weapon and create a life-threatening environment‚ sufficient to satisfy the Arizona armed robbery statute‚ by thrusting his hand into a pocket and telling the store clerk that it was a "holdup" and to "[l]ie still if you
Premium Robbery Theft
MEMORANDUM To: Scott Haddock‚ Supervising Attorney From: Bob Barker‚ Super Senior Paralegal Re: Paige Turner Our file No.: 12095 Public school searches Date: June 6‚ 2013 I. Issues 1. The issue is whether public school officials have the authority to perform strip searches of students in suspicion of hiding illegal drugs. 2. The issue is whether public school districts can perform random drug screening of students who participate in school athletic programs
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution