GROUP OF COMPANY Hotel Jaya Puri Sdn Bhd v National Union Bar & Restaurant Workers & Anor In this case‚ it was related to a bar that operated in a hotel and the workers of the restaurant in the hotel. The restaurant in the hotel is Jaya Puri Chinese Garden Restaurant Sdn Bhd. While the restaurant have no business and does not earn profit‚ the hotel managed to close down the restaurant. So‚ the restaurant workers are cut down and there are some workers of the restaurant were retrenched when the restaurant
Premium Subsidiary Corporation Parent company
Cruzan v. Director‚ Missouri Department of Health U.S. 261 (1990) was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6‚ 1989 and decided on June 25‚ 1990. In a 5-4 court decision‚ the court found in favor of the Missouri Dept. of Health. The court affirmed the ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri. However‚ it upheld the legal standard that competent persons are able to exercise the right to refuse medical treatment under the Due Process Clause and its implied right to privacy. Because
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
BUS A311 Case # 1 9/19/2012 Raintree Cosmetic Company Case Analytical Model Steps 1. Facts: * Raintree must maintain a current ratio of at least .9 in order to maintain the terms of the debt agreement in place with the bank. If Raintree fails to do so‚ the cost of borrowing from the bank will likely increase. * Raintree company controller‚ Jackson Phillips‚ estimates that the 2013 year-end assets and liabilities will be $2‚100‚000 and $2‚400‚000 respectively. This scenario
Premium Balance sheet Asset Inventory
Florida A&M University School of Business and Industry The Ethical and Legal Issues of Product Liability Courtney Jordan April 18‚ 2015 BUL 5323: Legal Issues and Environment Introduction Product liability refers to a manufacturer or seller being held liable for placing a defective product into the hands of a consumer. Responsibility for a product defect that causes injury lies with all sellers of the product who are in the distribution chain. This includes the manufacturer of component parts
Premium Product liability
Legal Liability 0f Parents Parents should and should not be held legally responsible for their children ’s actions. Parents who are incompetent and parents who are in the system themselves should be held responsible for their children ’s actions. Parents who are handicapped and parents who are competent should not be held responsible for their children ’s actions. Parents that do not rear their children should be held responsible. There are parents who do not care what the child does as
Premium Disability Developmental disability Mother
introduced in this case. Mr. Good put up an article on The Best Daily saying that he would share half of the advertising cost for anyone who places an advertisement in Best Daily with the intention of ‘initiating major legal response to raise climate change consciousness of the people of Hong Kong’. Our client‚ Mr. Concern who responded to Mr. Good’s offer‚ placed advertisements in 15 newspapers expressing ‘support for social reform for the protection of environment’. This case arises when Mr. Concern
Premium Contract
Chapter 2 Donoghue v Stevenson p.45 Donoghue found a snail in the ginger beer and got shocked. She sued Stevenson‚ the manufacture. Manufacturer owed a duty of care to customers. Neighbour test.Grant v Australian Knitting Mills p.48 Dr Grant suffered dermatitis because of the sulphites on the surface of the underwear manufactured by AKM. AKM owed a duty of care in the production of the underwear not to cause injury to Grant. McPhersons v Eaton p.49 Eaton died from the exposure to asbestos
Premium Contract Tort
Contracts‚ Torts and Product Liability Name Institution Chapters 6 and 7 of John McAdams book are on contracts‚ business torts‚ and product liability respectively. In order to understand these chapters fully‚ I will provide an appropriate case and the court’s ruling due to the influence of factors discussed in these two chapters. Before I discuss this case‚ an introduction on the keywords in these chapters in relation to business law is necessary. A contract is a binding legal
Premium Contract Tort
Threaten airports and governance’s liability Under radical uncertainty making airports’ governance fully responsible for potential damages seems difficult. In fact‚ their liability depends heavily of how the local and national authorities considered (or consider) the rise of seas associated to climate change. This last one depends on the convergence or the divergence of scientists’ views about a given event (here the strength and the range of the rise of the seas). Case 1: Convergent views among scientists
Premium Global warming Climate change Greenhouse gas
Cases in Canadian Law Dehghani v. Canada: The appellant‚ a citizen of Iran‚ arrived in Canada on May 13‚ 1989‚ and claimed refugee status. After being questioned in the primary examination line‚ he was referred to a secondary examination‚ which involved a long wait‚ and‚ as he did not speak English‚ an interpreter was provided for him. At the secondary interview‚ the appellant omitted significant facts. This case involves two issues that are worthy of analysis‚ as he claims‚ first of all‚ that
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Supreme Court of the United States Canada