AC208 Company Law Assignment Name : Wong Kai Jun Tutorial Group : T14 Tutor : Assoc/P Gan Lay Hong‚ Pauline Company Law Assignment The law requires that directors not take corporate opportunities without the permission of the company. The first part of the essay will touch on the ambit of this duty‚ and then I will go on to discuss whether the law imposes too harsh a burden on directors in this regard. First of all‚ "corporate opportunity" refers to a business opportunity
Premium Board of directors Fiduciary Corporation
Tort Law | Strict Liability | Alabama Law | | Shannon Martin | 12/22/2011 | | Alabama Tort Law is the only truly comprehensive resource on tort law in Alabama. With expert discussion of proof requisites and defenses‚ it covers all the elements of each tort actionable under Alabama law. It provides the information necessary to determine if there is a case and what is needed to prove or defend it. Alabama Tort Law not only provides up-to-date coverage of relevant case law and analysis
Premium Tort Alabama Strict liability
CSEA 2222 COMPANY LAW GROUP ASSIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Principle of Separate Legal Entity The principle of separate legal entity under the law is a company‚ upon incorporation‚ will becomes a body corporate that exists separately with its owner and distinct from its individual members and directors. This fundamental principle of company law was first established in the landmark case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (1897)‚ and formed the foundation of company law in Malaysia. Besides‚ this
Premium Corporation Holding company Subsidiary
the loan contract between ABC bank and Sambal Pty Ltd is invalid. State the law: Section 140 of the corporations act states that: “A company’s constitution (if any) and any replaceable rules that apple to the company have effect as a contract: (a) Between the company and each member; and (b) Between the company and each director and company secretary; and (c) Between a member and each other member; Apply the law: According to section 140‚ a company’s constitution is only an internal governance
Premium Corporation Company Types of business entity
Resit Coursework 2008/09 Answer the following question In January 2009‚ Adam began preparations to form a company to bid for a contract to provide security services at the new Wembley stadium. The company would be called ‘Fortress Ltd’. In February 2008‚ Adam received a loan of £10‚000 from Pioneer Bank to finance the proposed company’s bid for the contract. A clause in the loan agreement stated: “By this agreement made between you ‘Fortress Ltd’ and ourselves‚ we ‘Pioneer Bank’ agree to lend
Premium Insurance 1918
Bond Law Review Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 6 12-1-1998 Holding Company Liability for Debts of its Subsidiaries: Corporate Governance Implications Damien Murphy Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr Recommended Citation Murphy‚ Damien (1998) "Holding Company Liability for Debts of its Subsidiaries: Corporate Governance Implications‚" Bond Law Review: Vol. 10: Iss. 2‚ Article 6. Available at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol10/iss2/6 This
Premium Corporation
background on the case. The fact is ‚ John was travelling on the journey to Liverpool by using the ticket that his girlfriend had bought him. When he was boarding the ferry he was approached by a member of the ferry staff who informed him that he was the 100‚000th passenger to travel on the new service. He was also informed that if he would engage in a number of publicity events associated with the fact that he was the 100‚000th passenger that he would receive in turn unlimited travel on the ferry
Premium Contract
legal effect of common law and the Companies Act 1965 on pre-incorporation contracts. Pre-corporation contract is one which is entered into when the Company is in the process of being incorporated but is not yet completed it. At common law such contracts were held to be void‚ as the company is not yet in existence. - Newborne v Sensolid Ltd. In the common law effect‚ Pre-incorporation contracts cannot‚ in theory‚ be made by the company or by its promoter since the company or the principal does not
Premium Common law Contract Void
Sample Tutorial Answers (HBL221N Company Law) To answer all legal questions‚ students are to follow the essential steps of: (1) Identification of the issues in the questions; (2) State the relevant laws that can be used to resolve the issues in the questions; (3) Application of the relevant laws to the facts in the questions to resolve the issues in the questions (i.e. arguments); and (4) Conclusion based on arguments in Point (3). Your conclusion must resolve your issues in Point (1). NOTE:
Premium Corporations law Stock Law
of a company. And the common law has extended the scope of “promoter” further in Tracy v Mandalay Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 215. In this case‚ the High Court held that the promoters are not just these persons who take an active part in the formation process‚ but also these who profits from the operation of the company with a passive role. Applying this doctrine to the case study‚ Alicia can be regarded as one of the promoters of Batco Ltd‚ since she had involved in the formation of the company and
Premium Fiduciary Stock market Civil procedure