commerce liability bill. WHAT IS THE BILL? A civil nuclear agreement between India and United States in 2008 ended New Delhi’s isolation in global atomic commerce and opened up its state-controlled nuclear power market to foreign firms. But the deal could not be implemented until India put in place a compensation regime that limited the liability of private companies‚ especially those from the United States‚ in the event of an industrial accident. So India framed the Civil Liability for Nuclear
Premium United States Federal government of the United States Federal government
to the same word‚ “Responsibility.” Will we let our children forego the consequences of their actions? Even if we try the Parent Liability Childs Act will prevent parents from doing so. The Parent Liability Childs Act of 2000 in California states‚ “Parents jointly and severally liable for willful misconduct causing injury‚ death or property damage.” The Parent Liability Childs Act should be appealed because if the child isn’t punished they will commit more severe crimes‚ it is extremely unfair to
Premium Joint and several liability Crime Developmental psychology
Introduction to Occupier’s Liability in Singapore Occupier’s liability refers to the liability of an occupier of premises arising from the defective conditions or unsafe activities on the premises which result in injury or damage to the plaintiff. In Industrial Commercial Bank v Tan Swa Eng His Honour Lai Kew Chai J rightly held that “the law of occupiers’ liability in Singapore is derived from English common law”. However‚ statues on occupier’s liability in the England are not applicable to
Premium Law Tort Common law
undertakes to advise he must exercise reasonable care and skill in giving the advice. He is under no obligation to advise‚ but if he takes upon himself to do so‚ he will incur liability if he does so negligently.” ’ House of Lords in Banbury v. Bank of Montreal[1] I. Introduction The issue of legal liability of banks in the provision of negligent advice is one doctrine of law that has evolved through the years. In light of current controversies hounding the UK banking sector‚ it
Premium Contract Tort Fiduciary
interest on bonds payable Provision - deficiency income tax assessment TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 500‚000 50‚000 20‚000 64‚000 50‚000 200‚000 40‚000 80‚000 100‚000 90‚000 160‚000 120‚000 75‚000 87‚000 360‚000 200‚000 2‚500‚000 A Convertible bonds‚ due January 31‚ 2007 Noncurrent portion of serial bonds (P2‚000‚000 - P100‚000) TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 1‚000‚000 1‚900‚000 2‚900‚000 B 5‚400‚000 C TOTAL LIABILITIES (Requirement no. 2) 304‚000 PROBLEM NO. 3 - Pistons Company Item no. 2 Item no
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Bond Balance sheet
International Responsibility and Liability 1. Responsibility of States 2. Responsibility of International Organizations 3. International Liability 1. Responsibility of States 1.1 General Works In addition to chapters on responsibility of principal textbooks on international law‚ the following works specialized in responsibility are useful. D. Anzilotti‚ “La responsabilité internationale des Etats à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers‚ RGDIP‚ t.13 (1906)‚ pp.5-29. R. Ago‚ “Le
Premium Law United Nations International law
amortization schedule for the dates indicated. (Round all answers to the nearest dollar.) Use the effective-interest method. (10 points) Debit Credit Carrying Amount Credit Cash Interest Expense Bond Discount of Bonds October 1‚ 2006 $738‚224 April 1‚ 2007 October 1‚ 2007 (b) Prepare the adjusting entry for December 31‚ 2007. Use the effective-interest method. (5 points) (c) Compute the interest expense to be reported
Premium Liability Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Asset
Landmark Case “Use of Deadly Force” Tennessee v. Garner‚ et al In October of 1974‚ a Memphis Police officer made a split decision to fire a shot that ultimately ended the life of 15 year old Edward Garner. This choice was made in an attempt to prevent the deceased from evading an arrest based on an eye witness account of a suspected burglary. This action was disputed by the State of Tennessee and the deceased members father‚ each was basing the argument of very opposite ends of the spectrum
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Police
Professional Regulations and Criminal Liabilities Pearl Street HCS/430 Joann Wilcox February 13‚ 2011 Consumer concerns have increased over the past few years because of the dramatic changes in health care information and its’ delivery (Benfield‚ Ashkanazi‚ Rozensky 2006). Each day patients put their physical health and trust in the hands of health care providers. Unfortunately‚ there have been times when the treatment provided‚ whether accidental or intentional‚ has caused harm to the patient
Premium Health care Health care provider Patient
CHAPTER 15 Current Liabilities Management INSTRUCTOR’S RESOURCES Overview This chapter introduces the fundamentals and describes the interrelationship of net working capital‚ profitability‚ and risk in managing the firm’s current liability accounts. The management of current liabilities requires choosing appropriate levels of financing and involves trade-offs between risk and profitability. This chapter also reviews sources of secured and unsecured short-term financing‚ including the
Premium Loan Debt Accounts receivable