Following a brief investigation of the court listings for the 21st November 2013‚ I viewed the Court & Tribunal Services website that can be seen at the following URL‚ http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/_apps/courtlists/default.aspx Upon review of the daily listings‚ discussions with Court personnel and review of the proceedings in progress at the time of my visit to the District Court of Western Australia (500 Hay Street‚ Perth 6000)‚ I attended the following Criminal Proceedings which is
Free Jury Judge Court
the Research Paper 2 Juvenile sex offenders are frequently treated in the same manner as their adult counterparts with regards to punishment and sex offender registering. “Nationally‚ juvenile sex offenders make up 20% of all individuals charged with sexual offenses (McGinnis‚ 2006).” Placing a sex offender label on a juvenile may unjustifiably put restrictions on his or her opportunities in adulthood so it is for this reason that cases involving juvenile sex offenders should be prosecuted
Premium Sex offender Human sexual behavior
University Juvenile Justice Reform Act Effects on Society vs. the Juveniles Themselves Juvenile Delinquency Abstract Juvenile justice is the area of criminal law that applies to those individuals that aren’t of age to be held responsible for criminal acts. The age‚ in most states‚ for a juvenile criminal‚ is set at 18 years. While being mainly governed by state law‚ juvenile law usually enacts a juvenile code. Although the main goal of the juvenile justice
Premium Crime Juvenile delinquency
1012CCJ Court Report: 1. Which court did you attend and what was the date of your attendance? Attended The Southport Magistrates Court‚ 22nd of April 2013. 2. What kind of hearing did you attend? (e.g. sentence‚ summary trial‚ committal hearing‚ jury trial‚ mention‚ call-over etc) I attended a sentencing of an arrest (custody) at The Southport Magistrates Court‚ before the sentencing there were a string of mentions that I also watched to further my understanding of the courtroom
Premium Security Judge Law
Court Report 1. The name of the case is “Malaysia Venture Capital Management Berhad Vs. Mobifusion‚ Inc” and case number is 112CV236774. 2. Date and time of the session I attended is February 20th‚ 2014 at 9:00 a.m. 3. Number of department is Dept. 2‚ and the name of the judge is Patricia M. Lucas. 4. John V. Komar is the attorney for the plaintiff (Malaysia Venture Capital Management Berhad) and Chris Kao is the attorney for the defendant (Mobifusion‚ Inc) 5. Nature of dispute: a) The plaintiff
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
Juvenile Rehabilitation Organizational Plan Throughout history‚ many methods were utilized to sanction and rehabilitate juvenile delinquents. In this research paper‚ I aim to explore the various techniques which were tried and are currently used and suggested as a means of dealing with offending youths. Mainly‚ I want to inspect the advantages and disadvantages of each system so that I can understand the correlations of the methods and their abilities in producing a future law-abiding citizen.
Premium Crime Criminology Juvenile delinquency
AJ 101 Course # Court Visit On November 29‚ 2011‚ I had the opportunity to go to Los Angles Superior Court and was able to sit and observe during a Preliminary Hearing. The case that I sat in was about a rape case in which a young girl of approximately twelve years old said that her grandfather‚ who was about sixty years old would sexually touch her and do certain things to her everytime she would go over to her grandparents house. The prosecutor asked the young girl a serious of questions such
Premium Question Jury Family
Should we give juveniles life in prison with no parole? The answer is simple‚ no. if a juvenile commits a crime and is put in jail for life than they obviously did something worthy of getting put in jail for the rest of your life. And who’s to say there not fakeing good behavior‚ even psychopaths can hide their insanity. If a juvenile is going to commit a crime and get sentenced to life than they had to have done something so bad that they deserved it. We don’t put people in jail for fun‚ we do
Premium Prison Crime Criminal justice
Placing a juvenile into a secure facility is not advantageous to the juvenile and has nor proven to be to be beneficial to society either. Statistics show that almost half of the juveniles in custody have not committed a violent crime or one that was against another person (Elrod & Ryder‚ 1999). Secure facilities resemble prisons where offenders are locked down and kept away from the public‚ but provide no real systematic approach for helping the juvenile down a path that will lead them to being
Premium Crime Prison Criminal justice
decision of the United States Supreme Court which passed 5-4 in 1966 in the lawsuit Miranda v. Arizona‚ 384 U. S. 436. Miranda rights gives suspects the right to remain silent when arrested‚ the knowledge that any statement made can be used against them in a Court of law and an understanding they have the right to an attorney and they reserve the right to waive this right and succumb to interrogation by the police. Research abound that addresses the inability of juveniles in fully comprehending the implication
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution