research scientist working for Merck and Company‚ discovered evidence that one of the company’s drugs might kill the parasite that causes river blindness. He then decided to request permission to research this new finding. The mangers for the company noticed that it would take enormous amount of funding and time to develop this new vaccine. This new product could be really hard to market and who was going to actually buy it; it could also damaged the market share that Merck currently had by selling
Premium Medicine Science Physician
MERCK: OPEN FOR INNOVATION? Founded in 1891 as an American subsidiary of his German namesake‚ Merck was once considered the “undisputed king of the pharmaceutical industry with ground‐ breaking drugs”(The Chief Executive 2003). But for the last decade‚ Merck has gone through a period of stagnation; it began to lose exclusivity patents on blockbuster drugs and has witnessed Pfizer’s rise to top place in the industry. It seemed now that internal R&D that was once the company’s main asset would
Premium Pharmaceutical industry
2011). In 1978‚ Merck‚ while testing invermectin (a parasite killing drug for animals)‚ found that invermectin killed a parasite similar to the one that caused river blindness. The problem for Merck was that river blindness generally only affects people in very poor areas and there was very little chance to recoup their financial investment by selling the drug. The ethical dilemma represented by this situation is focused on what course of action Merck should take. Does Merck invest precious resources
Premium Ethics Decision making Onchocerciasis
MAINTENANCE EXCELLENCE COURSE A New Paradigm of Maintenance Management Attuned to the Requirements of the Present Marketplace and Environment. COURSE DESCRIPTION: This 3-day Maintenance Management course is about MAINTENANCE EXCELLENCE‚ which is now the Best Way that the Maintenance Function should be managed; in accordance with the requirements of the marketplace and the environment. This means managing Maintenance with a Zero Downtime and High-Efficiency mentality‚ and it must be carried
Premium Management Greenhouse gas Maintenance
Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the VIOXX Recall MBA 520-D4C2 Ethics & Leadership in a Global Environment April 22‚ 2012 Merck and Vioxx Recall Did Merck act in social and ethical manner? In 2005‚ Merck was ranked fourth in sales among pharmaceutical companies. Merck had released the drug Vioxx‚ for treating Osteoarthritis in late 1990. Merck as a company has a reputation of being one of the most ethical and
Premium Marketing Brand Management
we weave a unified digital infrastructure into new and existing buildings‚ communities‚ and cities. Fully integrated communications become the foundation for as yet uninvented applications and services that transform the ways in which we create and use the places where we live‚ work‚ play‚ and learn. “Pushing the boundaries of innovation is the only way forward. The book opens our eyes to the opportunities José-Carlos Arnal Juan-Alberto Belloch before us.” CITY OF ZARAGOZA Connected Real Estate
Premium Construction Real estate
A Discussion on the Company’s Decision Making Process‚ Group Behavior and Organizational Structure Abstract Merck is a pharmaceutical and medical researching company that is dealing with managerial challenges in their daily business operations. Their background and their issues regarding the matter will then help one understand how the actual picture of the real accounts of the managerial decision processes that happen to actual multinational company operations. Having been
Premium Corporation Business Company
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Statement of the Problem Merck & Co.‚ Inc.‚ a leading pharmaceutical company‚ faces the threat of the patents of its most popular drugs expiring in 2002. The only way to counter the loss of sales from these drugs going off patent is to develop new drugs in order to refresh the company’s portfolio. LAB Pharmaceuticals‚ a small pharmaceutical company who specializes in the treatment of neurological disorders‚ has approached Merck with the opportunity to license Davanrik‚ a new
Premium Patent Pharmacology Pharmaceutical drug
In the year 2000‚ Merck produced a controversial product called Vioxx. Four years later it gained worldwide attention because of the drug’s potential cardiovascular risks. This was detrimental to the company’s reputation because it was alleged Merck knowingly distributed Vioxx despite its risk. Both Barbara Martinez and Anne W. Mathews of the Wall Street Journal wrote articles into the investigation of Vioxx. Their article suggests Merck knew the dangers of Vioxx at an early stage of its clinical
Premium Clinical trial
positively affect the company’s image with the public. However‚ if they did not decide to develop the drug‚ it could negatively affect their image especially if the media would be aware of it. Think about the decision in terms of the CSR pyramid. Did Merck have an ethical obligation to proceed with development of the drug? Would it matter if the drug had only a small chance to cure river blindness? Does it depend on how close the company was to achieving a cure‚ or how sure they were that they could
Premium Integrity Pharmaceutical drug Onchocerciasis