CASE 8-1: NORMAN CORPORATION 1. Answer: The transaction should be recognized based on the following points: i. ii. Conservatism concept stated that expenses should be recognized as soon as they are reasonably possible to occur. According to loss contingency‚ a liability is recognized when information available indicates that it is probable for a liability to occur and when the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Therefore‚ Norman should provide a provision for loss and recorded the transaction
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - ROLE OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS People often question whether corporate boards matter because their day-today impact is difficult to observe. But‚ when things go wrong‚ they can become the center of attention. Certainly this was true of the Enron‚ Worldcom‚ and Parmalat scandals. The directors of Enron and Worldcom‚ in particular‚ were held liable for the fraud that occurred: Enron directors had to pay $168 million to investor plaintiffs‚ of which $13 million was out of pocket
Premium Corporate governance Board of directors Management
Case 1- Marriott Corporation: The Cost of Capital Some preliminary questions: 1. What do you think about Marriott’s policy of repurchasing shares? Repurchase whenever stock price < warranted equity value Does this mean the market is inefficient? 2. Why does Marriott manage rather than own hotel assets? Finding limited partners on a hotel project is equivalent to selling private equity in the project Is there any reason to
Premium Hotel Economics Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
1. How are Mortensen’s estimates of Midland’s cost of capital used? How‚ if at all‚ should these anticipated uses affect the calculations? Mortensen’s cost of capital estimates are used for a variety of purposes at both the divisional and corporate levels. Examples include internal analyses such as financial accounting‚ performance assessment and capital budgeting‚ while others are used for strategic planning purposes such as merger and acquisition‚ as well as stock repurchase decisions (Luehrman
Premium Cost Investment Capital
Title: Case 5 Hewlett- Packard’s Secret Surveillance of Directors and Journalist Martha E Richard Aiken Technical College Abstract Obtaining confidential information by posing as another person was unethical. There are other avenues that could have been assessed to get to the person who was responsible for the leakage in the cooperation to the media. Seeking a private investigation team was an extreme measure in my opinion. What is done in the darkness shall always reveal itself in
Premium Board of directors Hewlett-Packard Secrecy
Bioethics What good is life if there is no chance of living? This question centers on the case of Sun Hudson‚ the baby born with a fatal form of dwarfism who was removed from life support after 6 months. The most relevant information in this case was the decision to remove life support from the child contrary to the mother’s wishes. Was it morally correct or incorrect? Some people may believe that the child’s parent has the right to make decisions in regard to the child’s medical treatment. Others
Premium Ethics Morality Death
Corporate Tax‚ Cost of Debt‚ Cost of Equity and Capital Structure: A case study of REITs and conventional real estate firms in the UK University of Groningen Faculty of Economics and Business BSc International Business January 2013 Table of contents 1. Introduction 4 2. REITs 7 3. Literature Review 9 3.1 Capital Structure Irrelevance 9 3.2 Present Models 10 4. Data and Methodology 12 4.1 Regression 12 5. Findings and Discussion 16 6. Conclusion 20 7. Appendix
Premium Corporate finance Tax Capital structure
s Case Study: Marks and Spencer Where now for an icon of British retailing? History and background Early history Marks and Spencer (M&S) was founded by Michael Marks and Thomas Spencer in 1884 - he called his business ’penny bazaars’ with signs reading "Don’t ask the price‚ it’s a penny" (the forerunner of stores like Poundland today?) The company went public in the 1920’s and by the 1970’s M&S had established itself as a British institution with locations in every major town and
Premium
2.5.2 Effect of Board Independence on C.S.R. Board independence refers to a corporate board with majority of outside directors. It is believed that board dominated by outside or independence directors are more vigilant in monitoring behaviour and decision making of the company (Finegold et al.‚ 2007). The reason is that shareholders` interest could be well protected by outside directors than the inside directors. Outside directors bring in more skills and knowledge to the company which increases
Premium Management Corporate governance Corporation
Marriott Case 1. What is the WACC for Marriott Corporation? Cost of Debt Tax Rate We determined this number by taking income taxes paid/EBITDA = 175.9/398.9 = 44.1% Return on debt There are two clear components of debt: fixed and floating. In order to get the fixed debt rate we took the interest rates on fixed-rate government securities and added the premium
Premium Finance Marriott International Interest