Sebastian Dumoulin Intro To Ethics Dr. Fincke 01.22.2013 The Trolley Problem - Deontology - Consequentialism In our first class we started to go over both “Deontology” and “Consequentialism”. “Deontology” is a type of moral ethics where the belief is that a person should judge the morality of an action based purely on the rules set in place‚ without thought of consequences. In terms of the “Trolly Problem”‚ where you are on a trolly which is about to hit 5 people‚ and you have the opportunity
Premium Ethics Morality Moral absolutism
There have been scholars who have Normative ethics: conventional ethical theories: Virtue ethics‚ Deontology and utilitarianism. Virtues ethics focuses on the person not the act. Virtue ethics de-emphasises rules‚ consequences and acts. Aristotle agreed with Socrates and Plato that virtues are central to a well-lived life. He believes that an ethical person was the man of virtues. Virtue is the mean between two extremes. There is no univocal definition of ethics which is also known as moral philosophy
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
deontological vs. utilitarian ethics Kant believed that morality is dependent upon reason‚ that to act rationally was the same as acting morally. He placed a high value upon duty in determining the moral worth of an action. Kant’s deontological ethics is essentially an ethics of duty or obligation. As such‚ he claims that the moral worth of an action depends solely on whether or not it was done exclusively from a sense of duty. If an act is done simply because one is so inclined‚ the act has no
Premium Morality Ethics Intrinsic value
Final Project Part 2 Utilitarian Ethics: act and rule Definition of Act Utilitarian The goal of an act utilitarian is to maximize a person’s overall happiness in the universe. With an act utilitarian the goal will be to “Maximize pleasure and minimize pain” (Waller‚ 2005‚ p.49). An act utilitarian says that people could do that and they would not only make everyone happier but they would also be doing what is morally right. An act utilitarian doesn’t have conflicts over any action being
Premium
The underlying principle of utilitarian theory is it seeks to punish offenders to discourage or deter future unlawful activity. However‚ the retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished (Net Industries‚ 2014). The utilitarian theory recognizes that punishment has penalties for both the offender and society. It holds that the total good created by the punishment should go beyond the entirety of evil; meaning punishment should not be unlimited. For example‚ releasing
Premium Utilitarianism Hedonism Ethics
many dilemmas to evaluate. While analyzing it with my peers‚ it was common to find a consensus on one aspect‚ only to have it raise questions on another. On the other hand‚ Bernard Williams uses “Jim and the Indians” as an argument against the Utilitarian Approach (276)‚ however‚ most of the people I discussed it with defaulted to that very
Premium Scientific method Psychology Sociology
Deontologists don’t have a great deal of tenets. Now and again‚ this gives them a decent lot of flexibility. Since their standards prohibit or require just certain activities‚ different activities are accessible to them. A deontologist could never say‚ "It regards save the rain woods." After all‚ protecting the rain backwoods is about outcomes and that is not what a deontologist takes a gander at. So the deontologist may have the capacity to hack away and not feel regretful. Deontologists may state
Premium
This assignment will provide an overview of the main justifications for punishment and essentially discuss the moral and political arguments for and against punishment. A constant theme that will run throughout will be the Utilitarian philosophy of punishment. Utilitarianism is forward-looking and therefore seeks to prevent the reoccurrence of crime. This is generally achieved through Deterrence‚ Rehabilitation and Incapacitation with all too some extent playing a vital role in the criminal justice
Premium Utilitarianism Criminal justice Criminology
place and we were produced only to be consumed?”. To continue this discussion‚ we must take it to a philosophical level... so let’s get started‚ shall we? On the one hand‚ there would be no point in this reading without talking about the Utilitarian Theory which believes that it is ethically satisfactory to keep raising animals for food on the off chance that we enhance their living conditions‚ however it is not ethically worthy to kill them .On the other hand‚ there are the Deontological
Premium Meat Nutrition Vegetarianism
Thinking 24 November 2012 Term Paper Topic: Government Intervention in the Free Market through the Auto Industry Bailout and Healthcare Reform The topic being discussed in this paper is one as widely diverse in opinions as it is in matters of implementation; should government have the ability to intervene in the free market? Two present-day examples of this include the Auto Industry Bailout and Healthcare reform‚ both of which are hotly debated topics in the political‚ social‚ and economical spectrums
Premium Economics Government Capitalism