"Utilitarian instrumentalism" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 17 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Better Essays

    Should Justin Ellsworth’s Parents have been given access to his email? Table of Contents Pg. 3 Introduction Pg. 3 Utilitarian Pg. 4 Deontological Pg. 5 Yahoo’s Stance and overall outcome Pg. 5 Conclusion Pg. 6 References The question was posed; Should Justin Ellsworth’s Parents have been given access to his email? Justin Ellsworth was a US Marine killed in Iraq. After his death‚ his parents wanted access to his emails. Yahoo‚ his email service provided declined their

    Premium E-mail Internet Mobile phone

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    question of whether or not he made the right decision would depend on which theory you consulted. In terms of utilitarianism‚ there is no immediate right answer. The argument could even be made that an act utilitarian and a rule utilitarian would give the man different advice. So an act utilitarian is one that evaluates an action based on its individual effects; that is to say‚ they would perform an action if that specific circumstance would lead to more aggregate pleasure than pain. So in this situation

    Premium Love Marriage Mind

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sadsadas

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    to. A utilitarian philosophy is used when making social‚ economic or political decisions for the "betterment of society". In utilitarianism‚ an action is considered to have utility only to the extent that it contributes to the overall good. The philosophy of utilitarianism was first proposed and discussed by John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham in the mid-1800s. A philosophy that bases the moral worth of an action upon the number of people it gives happiness or pleasure to. A utilitarian philosophy

    Premium Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill Jeremy Bentham

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sales Promotion

    • 13361 Words
    • 54 Pages

    different levels of three hedonic benefits (opportunities for value expression‚ entertainment‚ and exploration) and three utilitarian benefits (savings‚ higher product quality‚ and improved shopping convenience). To address the second question‚ the authors develop a benefit congruency framework‚ which argues that a sales promotion’s effectiveness is determined by the utilitarian or hedonic nature of the benefits it delivers and the congruence these benefits have with the promoted product. Among other

    Premium Brand Sales promotion Marketing

    • 13361 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    take into consideration a change in moral behavioral character. Utilitarian theory is based on the capability to predict the consequences ones own action. The utilitarian uses the point system and prediction of solutions. Utilitarian has two types; act utilitarian and rule utilitarian. Each of the utilitarian types is somewhat different‚ yet similar. Act utilitarian is the same as the utilitarian theory; however‚ rule utilitarian considers the law and justice. Deontological theory is one that

    Premium Ethics Virtue ethics Deontological ethics

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My Sisters Keeper

    • 2290 Words
    • 10 Pages

    provide a genetically matched donor for an older sick child and to use the organs of the younger to the medical benefit of the elder is not morally justifiable using rule utilitarian ethical theory. This principle is not justifiable due to both the nature of the proposed rule regarding PGD and‚ primarily‚ to the nature of utilitarian ethical philosophy in general. Arguments Supporting Thesis: Rule utilitarianism is a moral philosophy holding that general rules for moral guidance should be developed

    Premium Ethics Utilitarianism Morality

    • 2290 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ghillyer EthicsNow IM Ch01

    • 6338 Words
    • 20 Pages

    CHAPTER 1 Understanding Ethics Table of Contents Chapter Summary and Learning Outcomes 2 Frontline Focus: Doing the Right Thing Questions 3 Learning Outcomes 4 Life Skills 8 Progress Check Questions 9 Ethical Dilemma Case 1.1 – Peer Pressure 13 Ethical Dilemma Case 1.2 – The Overcrowded Lifeboat 14 Frontline Focus: Doing the Right Thing—Megan Makes a Decision Questions 15 Key Terms 16 Review Questions 17 Review Exercises 18 Team Exercises 20 Thinking Critically 22 Chapter Summary This chapter

    Premium Ethics

    • 6338 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    was clear that every person’s pleasure had equal value: "each to count for one‚ and none for more than one". Utilitarians differ in what they consider intrinsically valuable or good (pleasure‚ happiness‚ fulfillment of preferences)‚ but agree that we ought to bring about as much good as possible. Utilitarianism: Act Utilitarianism Bentham is generally considered to have been an Act Utilitarian – he would judge each situation differently‚ doing that action that led to the greatest good. Act Utilitarianism

    Premium Utilitarianism

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    England by Jeremy Bentham‚ John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in‚ is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action‚ in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation‚ well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered. A utilitarian decides each action‚ by calculating the overall utility (good) that will results

    Free Utilitarianism

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism. Utilitarians believe “our moral faculty‚ according to all those of its interpreters who are entitled to the name of thinkers‚ supplies us only with the general principles of moral judgments; it is a branch of our reason‚ not of our sensitive faculty; and must be looked to for the abstract doctrines of morality‚ not for perception of it in the concrete.” (Mill) They believed that things should only be done if they are for the good of the majority. Dickens did not agree with utilitarian beliefs

    Free Hard Times

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 50