fact that he was no political infant. On the contrary‚ he has been called‚ amongst other things‚ a ‘great sinner’ (Dostoevsky‚ cited in Frank 2003:13)‚ a ‘teacher of evil’ (Strauss 1958: 11)‚ a ‘quintessential tactician’ (Lukes 2001: 562) and a ‘utilitarian moralist’ (Wilde 1928: 222). After all‚ against the ecclesiastical backdrop of the post-Augustinian Christianity of his time‚ Machiavelli boldly challenges religious morality in politics‚ lambasts older traditions of political thought‚ exposes the
Premium Political philosophy
Much of what we know about the intellectual‚ social and moral development of infants at birth and as they grow into adults are through the developmental theories. Some of the developmental theories are sexual development‚ social development and moral development. Both Jean Piaget and Lawrence Kohlberg view similarities as well as differences between the theories they each believe in regards to the development of a child social and moral development. Jean Piaget put forth the theory of cognitive
Premium Jean Piaget Theory of cognitive development Kohlberg's stages of moral development
defining the process of animal testing and go through some of its history. It will discuss whether the testing of animals for medical purposes is just or unjust and evaluate which types of testing are ethically acceptable and which are not from a Utilitarian and Kantian viewpoint. It will conclude with evaluations of the different standpoints and state why I believe it is just and ethically acceptable to use animals for medical research. The subject of animal testing for medical research has been
Free Animal rights Animal testing Tom Regan
ethics‚ justice is defined as fairness‚ where all situations should be treated alike. For one to exhibit justice‚ one must portray the quality of being fair and reasonable in all situations. While egalitarians evaluate justice based on equality‚ utilitarians are only interested in justice as a means to an end. Smart advocates the principle of utility‚ which defines the morally action as whatever produces the greatest net happiness for everyone affected by that act. To identify an act as just‚’ Rawls
Premium John Rawls A Theory of Justice Utilitarianism
How to Get Away With Murder Morality and the concept of morals define each individual. Morality is doing what “good” or what is just‚ and refers to the code of conduct that governs those who wish to behave according to that code (Stanford‚ 2014). By all those who believe in the existence of morality‚ the values and ethics set forth must not be overridden for fear of both corporeal and mental punishment. Such responsibilities tie friends together and split enemies. Moral obligations can even be taken
Premium Morality Ethics Murder
making approaches. There are two‚ the utilitarian and the deontological approach. Utilitarian approaches focus on society while deontological approaches focus on the individual. Utilitarian ideals require patient autonomy because patient autonomy is crucial when discussing what is morally best for human needs. Utilitarian views are similar to consequentialist views which focus on how the results and the outcomes determines how successful it is. The utilitarian approach is based off of what is best
Premium Patient Medicine Autonomy
makes comments on the central theme of fact versus fancy. Due to this theme‚ the novel ends with many characters realising that a person needs more than just fact in their life. The novel examines the utilitarian system through various characters such as Tom‚ who has been brought up in the utilitarian education system. Dickens exposes his own views on this system through Sissy Jupe‚ the uneducated daughter of a circus master‚ and the positive influence she has on the Gradgrind family. Thomas Gradgrind
Premium Hard Times
In both philosophies it is deemed immoral not to help. A Utilitarian would without hesitation sacrifice ten individuals in order to save 15 others‚ deontologists would not sacrifice ten people as that would be seen as murder which goes against their moral obligations namely the CI. Deontology is more equal than utilitarianism
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Deontological ethics
single acts (act utilitarianism)‚ or to acts only indirectly through some other suitable object of moral assessment‚ such as rules of conduct (rule utilitarianism). Utilitarianism opens with a short chapter in which J. S. Mill‚ having traced the utilitarian tradition Socrates criticizes intuitionist philosophies and invites to overcome the Kantian definition of moral obligation on behalf of his consequentialism. In Chapter II he states that "actions are good or bad insofar as they tend to promote
Free Utilitarianism
start off by defining what utilitarian mean well based off of the module a utilitarian is the person who believes in the greater good in other words a person who would take losses and justify it’s worth by the results gained from it. Now in regard to the question on how might utilitarian respond to the situation of the innocent man who was executed in order to keep the citizens from rioting. My answer to that is it would be the exact same result‚ because of how a utilitarian thinks. In situations like
Premium KILL Human Thou