Advocates that describe letting someone die as being more moral than killing someone often cite the trolley case as support for their argument‚ and use modus tollens. Where a trolley is coming down the track towards a group of five unsuspecting individuals‚ and you are in a position to pull a lever. Pulling the lever switches the tracks to just kill one unsuspecting person. Their argument is that if you pull the lever to switch the track to kill the one individual; then‚ by deciding who dies‚ you
Premium Morality Ethics Human
universal law: as it violates the universal principles‚ even in the hopes that an action will solve or lessen pain‚ it would still be an act of self-defeat‚ because the negative energy in the act of killing would return upon one’s self. Using utilitarian ethics to solve the trolley problem – the principles are such that the balance of right and wrong are measured by the outcomes of an action. In the trolley problem the applicant in both
Premium Morality Ethics
activity is resolved exclusively by its incentive in giving joy or joy as summed among every single cognizant being. It is a type of consequentialism‚ implying that the ethical worth of any activity is controlled by its result. In this manner the utilitarian saying: the best use for the best number. The biggest supporters of utilitarianism were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The complaint that I am will concentrate on in this paper is an expensive one yet‚ in addition‚ I trust the most essential
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Hedonism
same-sex marriage as your essay topic. Describe the ethical implications of your topic‚ and discuss how others have expressed moral judgments about your topic. Finally‚ identify and explain the rationale for your opinion as either consequentialist/utilitarian‚ nonconsequential/Kantian‚ or natural law. Your research should be documented by citing at least five credible sources such as the textbook‚ a newspaper‚ a biographic article‚ book‚ or website. Wikipedia and any similar online reference sites
Premium Ethics Morality Sexual intercourse
with the terrorists plot to crash the plane into Washington D.C. Would it be acceptable for the government to launch military aircraft to intercept and possibly shoot down the airliner knowing that all 44 people on board would be killed? From a utilitarian mindset my answer would have to be yes. The whole point behind utilitarianism is to find the one action which maximizes utility‚ meaning‚ producing the greatest net benefit. When all things have been considered there is only one right action
Premium September 11 attacks Utilitarianism Federal government of the United States
Anyone who has ever surfed the Internet‚ watched a network television program‚ or driven down a busy street has encountered an unpleasant reality of modern life: the proliferation of advertising. Advertisements for everything from cars to pain relievers promise to imbue the owner with happiness‚ health‚ and sex appeal. Pop-up ads on personal computers correspond to the user’s surfing habits to create a highly individualized onslaught of messaging. While Americans might grumble about the lengthy
Premium Blood Blood donation Donation
Deontology and Accounting Ethics Amanda Dunn Liberty University Introduction Body 1 Ethical Systems Description 1 Deontological 2 Utilitarian 2 Ethical Systems Evaluation 1 Organizational Culture of Accounting 2 AICPA Professional Code of Conduct 3 Utilization of a Deontological System Conclusion Introduction No man can be certain beyond a shadow of a doubt how he will react in any given situation. One can know how he would hope to react; however‚ until
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant
Essay Question: Rule Vs. Act Utilitarianism (Utilitarianism) Suppose that you were wondering whether you‚ as a doctor‚ should hug a patient who is in tears. Give an ethical analysis of pros and cons from an act utilitarian point of view. Then give an analysis from a rule utilitarian point of view. 2. Essay Question: (Case Scenario -- Utilitarianism) Suppose that Rosa moves away her children out of town because‚ based on the information she has gathered‚ she believes the move will be the
Premium Utilitarianism Laws of war Terrorism
Isn’t it wrong to use a human in this way – exploiting his vulnerability‚ taking his life with out consent even it doing so benefits others? (Would the boy’s consent change the situation‚ making it justifiable?) The first argument accepts the utilitarian assumption that morality consists in weighing costs and benefits and simply wants a fuller reckoning of social consequences. I.E. Morality of actions depends solely on the consequences it brings about; the right thing to do is if it will produce
Premium Jeremy Bentham Utilitarianism Utility
1. Ethics is the study of (Points : 1) propositional knowledge. right and wrong. beauty. truth. none of the above. Question 2. 2. A sound-thinking deontologist might use which statement to support a woman’s right to vote? (Points : 1) The happiness of 50% of the population being allowed to vote outweighs the pain that might come out of the other 50%. Humans are autonomous beings that inherently have the same capacities.
Premium Ethics Morality Human rights