Paper #1 In A Critique of Utilitarianism‚ Bernard Williams argues that when following a Utilitarian approach for moral dilemmas‚ Utilitarianism might have us sacrifice or modify our moral integrity. Williams explains this argument with a hypothetical execution situation with protagonist Jim. Jim‚ who is a botanical expeditionary‚ accidentally wanders in the central square of a small South American town. There‚ he finds twenty Indians tied up in a row‚ with several armed soldiers standing in front
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
BP Crises Law/531 October 1‚ 2012 The Deepwater Horizon disaster attributed to BP‚ a multinational oil and gas company‚ occurred in 2010 dumping massive amounts of oil in the waters on the gulf coast. The BP is headquartered in London with operations in 80 countries with the largest being in the United States. Team B participated in a simulation that presented a similar scenario as the oil spill mentioned. The company in the
Premium Exxon Valdez oil spill Oil spill Petroleum
strategy Oil companies were the worst performing brands in the world market. There was no brand in the oil industry that had created positive perception in the public. During the late 1990’s BP has decided to change this perception for their brand. The main idea was to create a symbolic capital for BP. The definition of symbolic capital is given by (Bourdieu‚ 1974/1977 sited in Holt & McNulty‚2008‚p.76) as “ the resources by which authority and credibility are established amongst employees‚ peers
Premium Petroleum
that this would be a more ethically defensible approach.” Choose one side of this argument and use a utilitarian framework to argue in favour‚ using the framework to show the weakness in the opposite view Introduction Utilitarianism is a justification for free-market capitalism. It is a moral perspective that aims to achieve the greatest social benefit net of social cost or‚ more express informally as “one that maximizes utility” Both shareholder and stakeholders are
Premium Profit maximization Stakeholder Corporate social responsibility
Board of Directors Presentation Global Management Darleen Busot MGT/230 April 13‚ 2014 Patricia Ford Agenda Organizational Direction Goals and Objectives Strategic Planning Tactical Planning Operational Planning Contingency Plan Ethics and Legal Responsibilities Organizational Direction Safety First‚ striving to be a responsible corporation among the industry is our top priority. Create safety programs that will enable our employees during emergencies. Management will ensure
Premium Management Corporation Environment
cooperating and negotiating with BP on the merger issue. Based on Amoco’s stand-alone valuation‚ it was reasonable to estimate $47 million enterprise value and $41.5 million equity value‚ with a walking-away exchange ratio 0.54. Then adding synergy‚ it reached an opening exchange ratio 0.72. Through further negotiation with BP‚ both parties reached a conclusion on certain level synergy distribution and agreed to close the deal at an exchange ratio of 0.65. The merger of Amoco and BP had strategic significance
Premium Stock market Fundamental analysis Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
credit with the drawee bank. The gravamen of this special penal law is the issuance of check‚ not the non-payment of the obligation. (Lozano vs. Martinez‚ 146 SCRA 323). Checks form part of the banking system for being substitutes for money. Hence‚ BP Blg. 22 is neither violative of the constitutional provision against imprisonment of non-payment of debt nor the non-impairment clause. In the case of Que vs. People‚ the Supreme Court settled that B.P.22 applies even in cases where the
Premium Cheque Bank
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that is considered to be influential in a society. A moral theory is an explanation of how the paradigms of right or wrong associated with actions‚ simultaneously explaining how one’s character can be considered good or bad. Through this moral theory known as utilitarianism‚ one’s actions play a key role. An individual who practices the utilitarian moral theory has right actions as long as it promotes happiness for the maximum number of people possible leading to
Premium Utilitarianism Animal rights
The use of utilitarianism when making moral decisions leads to an injustice society‚ evaluate this claim. The use of utilitarianism is a controversial subject for many people‚ some believe by using it‚ it can bring happiness to the majority of society‚ others say by using utilitarianism it can take away peoples own judgment making our society unjust. Strengths of Bentham’s theory begin with the fact that utilitarianism offers a relatively straightforward method for deciding the
Free Utilitarianism Ethics Morality
believe in it‚ it needs to benefit them in some way. This paper will discuss the properties of utilitarianism and the benefits it has on society. It will also compare utilitarianism to egoism‚ Kantian ethics‚ intuitionism and affirmative action. Utilitarianism’s overall purpose is to serve the greater majority and this paper sets out to prove that. This paper will discuss many major points in utilitarianism such as: it links happiness and morality‚ it conforms to meet the needs of different situations
Premium Decision making Ethics