Melissa Watchorn November 4‚ 2011 The Teleological Argument and its Not-so-logical Form. The teleological argument attempts to prove in its form that there is an ultimate design and therefore ultimate designer of the universe. It attempts to tell us that‚ since the universe shows some form of design (a butterfly’s wings‚ a human eye‚ etc)‚ there must be some sort of intelligent designer behind it all. The argument from design is as follows: “Watches‚ houses‚ ships‚ machines and so on all
Premium Intelligent design Evolution Charles Darwin
addressing our argument to a group of representatives from corporate companies in the country. In 2011 we successfully held a fundraising event which helped us raise enough funding to support the activities of our organization. We used the funding to buy the healthiest vegetables from local farmers and purchase only the naturally raised meat. While our goal is to fight hunger in the country‚ we also maintain an eco-friendly outlook. A clear statement of purpose for the argument After the financial
Premium Logic Hunger Argument
Cart on a Ramp Argument Essay The experiment can be used to determine the acceleration due to gravity accurately when the slope of the ramp is extrapolated to 90 degrees. Experimentally‚ the acceleration due to gravity is valid because when the ramp is set to a 90 degree angle‚ it essentially has no slope‚ so objects that are set at a 90 degree angle experience free-fall which is 9.8 m/s2. Using this knowledge‚ during the experiment if the ramp is set at a higher slope‚ it is essentially approaching
Premium Classical mechanics General relativity Force
To deliberate upon this argument and determine a personal standpoint is a difficult task. However‚ it is clear that “the argument from design” in all of the forms in which it appears‚ is an argument th agreeing with. While every argument has flaws‚ and there are many objections to “the argument from design” specifically‚ the argument itself presents clear reasons to at least consider its correctness. To begin‚ much of science is based on observation and‚ as “the argument from design” is based on
Premium Intelligent design Universe Charles Darwin
Moore−Parker: Critical Thinking‚ Eighth Edition 7. The Anatomy and Varieties of Arguments Exercises © The McGraw−Hill Companies‚ 2007 EXERCISES 231 When a premise is unstated‚ try to supply a reasonable assumption that would make the argument valid or strong. I If you have trouble tracking the parts of an argument that appears in a written passage‚ try diagramming the passage. I Exercise 7-1 Indicate which blanks would ordinarily contain premises and which would ordinarily
Premium
According to an argument in BBC‚ it states that‚ “Scientists experiment on animals for a host of different reasons‚ including basic research to explore how organisms function‚ investigating potential treatments for human disease‚ and safety and quality control testing of drugs‚ devices and other products. Its proponents point to the long list of medical advances made possible with the help of animal research” (Katsnelson). I believe that this first argument is the strongest because it offers several
Premium Science Research Experiment
Aquinas have written about God’s existence in their work. In this paper‚ I will discuss Anselm’s ontological argument which begins with the definition of God and ends with the existence of God. I will first introduce the premises and the conclusion of the argument‚ which is that “God is the greatest” and “Therefore He Exists”. Secondly‚ I will focus on the strengths and weaknesses of the argument‚
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
Anselm’s argument did lead to objections as most do. The first was that of a Monk Named Gaunilo‚ who argued against Anselm’s ontological Argument with the use of the concept of a perfect island. Gaunilo argued that concept of a perfect island does not prove that the existence of an island. In this case that perfection does not imply ‘existence’. Gaunilo claims that if the word God was replaced with the words perfect island‚ then Anselm’s ontological argument would not conclude that the perfect island
Premium Existence God Metaphysics
Far Should Science Extend the Human Lifespan? Ed. Tamara Thompson. Detroit: Greenhaven Press‚ 2009. At Issue. Rpt. from "Transcription of George Dvorsky ’s and Anders Sandberg ’s talks from the IEET ’s July 23rd Longevity Dividend Seminar: Popular Arguments For and Against Longevity." http://www.sentientdevelopments.com 23 July 2007. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Oct. 2014. "Is Immortality Bad (yes) or Good (no)?" The Premier Online Debate Website. Web. 31 Oct. 2014. Said-Moorhouse‚ Lauren
Premium Life Population Human
In this excerpt Kass is presenting his testimony to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission‚ in which he urges the commission to declare human cloning unethical. Kass’s argument is based on: considerations related to the ethics of experimentation‚ concerns about identity and individuality‚ the dangers of transforming procreation into manufacture‚ and the negative impact upon out understanding of what it means to have children. Throughout the testimony goes on to explain not only why cloning is
Premium Human Genetics DNA