Name: Do Dinh Trung [Trung] Date: August 27th 2013 Title: Chapter 2 Note SECTION 1 Experimental Method Science usually begin with observation => a piece of information gathered by using our senses To extend their senses‚ science often use tools such as ruler‚ microscopes … etc Hypothesis => a testable idea or explanation that lead to a investigation Prediction => Logical statement about wat will happen if the hypothesis is correct Observation => Question Hypothesis =>
Premium Scientific method Theory Science
Deductive Arguments and Fallacies in the Presidential Debates Politics has always been one of the subjects where people use all sorts of different words and styles to convince people that their choices are the right choices. It isn’t surprising that one of the easiest places to find deductive arguments and fallacies is during one of the largest broadcasted and viewed political events‚ the Presidential Debates. In this paper I will point out a deductive argument and a fallacy from each of the three
Premium
Assumptions and Fallacies What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? * An assumption is something we take for granted. We assume our beliefs to be true and use them to interpret the world about us. We humans naturally and regularly use our beliefs as assumptions and make inferences based on those assumptions. We must do so to make sense of where we are‚ what we are about‚ and
Premium Critical thinking Logic Reasoning
about the plot and characters to keep the reader interested. In chapter 1 Bronte begins to reveal parts of Jane’s character. We first see her as a vulnerable girl who is unable to show her emotions‚ this is because Bronte cleverly uses pathetic fallacy to only give us a hint of what Jane is like and in turn keeping the reader intrigued. “Clouds so sombre and rain so penetrating” is how Jane describe the weather but we the reader realise that this is Bronte telling us how Jane is feeling. The reader
Premium Jane Eyre Fiction
Open the link to the list of political speeches by G.W. Bush and J. Kerry‚ read some of the speeches and identify fallacies used by the author. Explain what is wrong in the reasoning used by them. Maksym Piekut (24665) Browsing through some of John Kerry’s speeches I have managed to spot a few common reasoning fallacies. The following quote suggests an appeal to tradition fallacy: “This is not the way we do things in America. Here in America‚ we don’t sacrifice science for ideology. We are a
Premium George W. Bush Democratic Party President of the United States
the Rights of the Child‚ essentially provides the same two psychological loopholes‚ by allowing "best interests" and "child desires" considerations to be utilized in international child abduction litigation. There is an inherent "psycho-logical fallacy" in The Hague Abduction Convention. Virtually everything we know‚ psychologically and empirically‚
Premium Law Human trafficking Human rights
the heart rate and ventilation rate before‚ during and after moderate exercise. Introduction: I predict that during exercise the heart and respiratory rate (RR) will increase depending on the intensity of exercise and the resting rates will be restored soon after exercise has stopped. I believe that the changes are caused by the increased need for oxygen and energy in muscles as they have to contract faster during exercise. When the exercise is finished the heart and ventilation rates will gradually
Premium Oxygen Blood Carbon dioxide
Mary Morgan Yeatts 11 September 2013 Logical Fallacies editorial These days‚ a person hears a lot about legalizing marijuana and why it could be beneficial for our country‚ but people forget why it was illegalized in the first place. Marijuana is a drug. Drugs are addictive and deadly. If we legalize marijuana now‚ we’ll end up with a generation of reefer addicts who die by their mid-30s if they manage to escape being the victims of violent crime. Also‚ the people who use marijuana now despite
Premium Crime Drug addiction Law
It is undeniable that these two articles‚ “Intentional Fallacy” written by Wimsatt/ Beardsley and “Irony as a Principle of Structure” written by Brooks‚ address two very different topics in order to discuss how they view the overall goals of New Criticism‚ but it also has to be understood that their topics culminate to several cohesive points. The first point being that a work should be closely read in order to understand the work itself not the context surrounding it‚ or in other words‚ understanding
Premium Writing Critical thinking English-language films
A logical fallacy is a faulty reasoning used to persuade. It is always done on purpose and targets people’s ignorance and stupidity. Either/or Fallacy An either/ or fallacy is a complex issue reduced to only two alternatives‚ neither of which is acceptable. Reverend Parris quoted‚”There is either obedience or church will burn like hell is burning.” This is either/or fallacy because Proctor had just criticized Parris for his focuses on deeds and mortgages. Ad hominem(to the man) An ad hominem
Premium God Christianity Jesus