be explored to understand the reasoning behind this "blind ethnic retribution" (Deviant Behavior‚ 1994‚ Feb‚ 1-32). Would Reginald Denny have been pulled out of his truck and nearly beaten to death if he were black by these black men? After the verdicts‚ people living in south-central Los Angeles and other minority neighborhoods began chanting‚ "No Justice‚ No Peace!" They saw the enemy as white‚ whether it be in the form of the white officers who beat Rodney King‚ or for the Denny’s assailants
Premium Los Angeles Rodney King Police brutality
Informed consent is a legal document which serves as an agreement for treatment‚ non-treatment‚ or for an invasive procedure that requires physicians to disclose the benefits‚ risks‚ and alternatives to the treatment‚ non-treatment‚ or procedure (1). In order for informed consent to be considered valid‚ the client must be competent and the consent should be given voluntarily. For individuals who are legally incapable of giving informed consent‚ psychologists need make sure to provide an appropriate
Free Insanity defense Mental disorder Psychiatry
The Understanding of Double Jeopardy Channelle M. Hopson Grambling State University Author Note Channelle M. Hopson‚ Department of Criminal Justice‚ Grambling State University. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Channelle M. Hopson‚ Department of Criminal Justice‚ Grambling State University‚ Grambling‚ La. 71245. Contact: monique2us2000@gmail.com Abstract This paper is to enlighten the audience of the double jeopardy rule. Double jeopardy refers to a person being
Premium Jury Double jeopardy Murder
The jury system has deep historical roots and has been described by Lord Devlin in title ‘Trial by Jury’ as ‘the lamp that shows the freedom lives’. Juries allow the citizens to take part in the administration of justice so that verdicts are seen to be those of society rather the judicial system. Furthermore‚ in Justice‚ Democracy and the Jury‚ named Gobart James stated that freeing the jury from the law and precedent allows them to follow their conscience and good sense‚ and juries instinctively
Premium Jury Law
People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson‚ the trial lasted from November 2‚ 1994 to October 3‚ 1995. After the extensive trial‚ Simpson was acquitted on murder due to a lack of evidence to convict him. This verdict is one of the most highly debated verdicts in one of the most high profile case. The origin of this high profile case dates back to June 12‚ 1994. The facts of this night are disputed but what is known is that an intruder entered through the gate of Nicole Simpson’s
Premium O. J. Simpson murder case Nicole Brown Simpson O. J. Simpson
them” (Bartley‚ 2016). This helps establish motive‚ which can explain why the accused wanted to commit the crime; however‚ does not mean he actually did it. Therefore‚ the Crown needed to provide additional indirect evidence in order support a guilty verdict. In the Lethbridge College Mock Court Exemplar video (2004) the Crown lacked in providing additional evidence‚ which can aid in building the theory that the accused committed this offence. The witnesses provided oral evidence‚ which can attest to
Premium Crime Criminal law Law
Professionals in the criminal justice field have the discretion to make many ethical choices throughout their careers. These choices are so significant that their outcomes can determine the futures of those involved. An ethical choice that prosecutors have to make daily‚ revolves around plea bargaining. Plea bargains are negotiations for contracts between the prosecution and the defense in an attempt to get them to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain.”). The prosecutor offers to reduce the severity or the
Premium Jury trial Criminal law Crime
lawyers and ambulance chasing which is frowned upon. There are two great movies that explain both of these topics. One of the movies is “My cousin Vinny” which shows you an example of an overall bad lawyer. The other movie is a bit more popular “The Verdict” which portrays a morally bad lawyer that is an ambulance chaser. Discussion: Let’s get started! The first thing I’d like to discuss is a bad lawyer just in general. I don’t know if a lot of people seen the movie “My Cousin Vinny” but that
Premium Law Lawyer Bar association
lack of evidence and the accuser refusing to cooperate with the investigators. However‚ most cases are not so black and white. In the 1994 O.J. Simpson murder trial‚ ethical issues were obvious for not only the defense of O.J. Simpson‚ but for the verdict as well. Although a substantial amount of hard evidence was presented to the jury‚ he was eventually found not guilty. Racial tension during that time was a possible solution to why he was inevitably acquitted. It also could’ve been the fact that
Premium Law United States Crime
Do jurors deliver justice? The professional judges and jurors‚ constituting a committee‚ personify themselves two various springs‚ pursuing one aim: an impartial and an objective adjudication and rendering a fair verdict. However‚ a judge embodies the judicial tradition‚ power‚ professional knowledge and gathered experience‚ while the jurors contribute to a trial a sense of public conscience‚ which is strictly contained in the mind of fellow citizens‚ which at times have a diverse idea of justice
Premium Jury Law Common law