according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek‚ pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible‚ or “liable‚” for those injuries. According to the case‚ Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed
Premium Abuse Child abuse Bullying
Tort Actions The most prevalent tort in scenario 2 is negligence. The first act of negligence would be the glass that was found in Anna’s food that caused her injury. The second negligent act was the waiter’s decision to carry a flaming dish through the restaurant without announcing his presence. The restaurant owner’s negligent decision to not install an emergency exit other than a revolving door entrance caused an elderly woman to be trampled and caused several other patrons to suffer from
Premium Tort Law Negligence
Introduction This essay is an attempt to advise Changwa on the area of law under which he can bring an action in view of the facts given in the question. The essay will also attempt to advise Changwa with respect to the person against whom such action can be brought. In order to achieve this end‚ the essay will pay particular attention to the salient elements he has to establish in the area of law identified‚ if at all he is to succed in his claim. The essay will conclude by looking at the likely
Premium Duty of care Tort Law
CRIMINAL LIABILITIES OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS misfeasance is any person‚ who‚ by direct provision of law‚ popular election or appointment by competent authority‚ shall take part in the performance of public functions in the government‚ or shall perform in said government or in any of its branches public duties as an employee‚ agent or subordinate official of any rank or class Dereliction of Duty by Officers Related to the Administration of Justice Articles 204 - 209 Art. 204
Premium
PLEASE TRANSFER ALL YOUR ANSWERS TO THE ANSWER SHEET. Part |Part One |Part Two |Part Three |Part Four |Part Five |Part Six |Part Seven |Part Eight |Part Nine |Part Ten |Total | |Exam Marker | | | | | | | | | | | | |Score | | | | | | | | | | | | | Part One: (15 points) On December 31‚ 2006‚ Poore Co. is in financial difficulty and cannot pay a note due that day. It is a $500‚000 note with $50‚000 accrued interest payable to Edsen‚ Inc. Edsen agrees to forgive the accrued interest
Premium Liability Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Asset
Buckwold and Kitunen‚ Canadian Income Taxation‚ 2010-2011 Ed. CHAPTER 10 INDIVIDUALS: DETERMINATION OF TAXABLE INCOME AND TAXES PAYABLE Review Questions 1. Briefly explain the difference‚ for individuals‚ between net income for tax purposes and taxable income. 2. Explain the difference between an allowable capital loss and a net capital loss. 3. Describe the tax treatment of net capital losses. 4. Explain how a non-capital loss is created and how it is treated for tax
Premium Taxation Taxation in the United States Tax
become an epidemic that the educational system has been campaigning to cease through the establishment of school wide anti-bullying policies. In recent years the federal government has implemented the National Safe Schools Framework and the Civil Liability Act of 2002‚ to assist educators with diminishing schoolyard bullying (Campbell 64). Since the development and rise of technological resources‚ cyber-bullying has expanded the opportunity for the act of bullying to take place; bullying is no longer
Premium Abuse Bullying Education
Imperfection in liability system The products liability system has been criticized on equity‚ distributive‚ and efficiency grounds. The equity arguments often express a belief that cases should be inside on the basic afford and negligence. In particular‚ firm consider it in equitable to be assessed damage when there was nothing that could be done to prevent the injury. Objection had been made to the inability to use state-of-the-art design as a defense in cases governed by strict liability. In the absence
Premium Common law Contract Tort
The question asked basically has two parts. In the first part of my essay I will try to shed some light on circumstances where an employer can be held liable for the torts of his/her employees. And after that I will focus on some of the reasons why one person is held liable in certain situations for the torts committed by another person. And then I will finally finish the essay with a conclusion at the end. Vicarious liability is where one person is held liable for the torts of another‚ even though
Premium Employment Tort law Strict liability
Recognizing and Minimizing Tort & Regulatory Risk Plan The purpose of the Recognizing and Minimizing Tort and Regulatory Risk Plan to explain how regulatory risks and common torts describe specific measures on how an organization can manage and minimize each individual risk. The preventive‚ detective‚ and corrective measures for each are explained below. The situation in the Business Regulation Simulation is that Alumina Inc. was involved in some regulatory issues and Alumina Inc. social responsibility
Premium United States Environmental Protection Agency Tort Regulation