* * Yogi’s Minimum * Case 08-4 * * Background * * A public utility company‚ Big Bear Power‚ has signed a 10-year non-cancelable lease from Goliath Company for a combustion turbine. The lease agreement is signed on December 15‚ 2004 and Big Bear has the right to use the turbine as of January 1‚ 2005. * Annual lease payments are $1 million per year‚ payable ratably over 12 months at the beginning of each month‚ according to the lease agreement. The minimum rent
Premium Renting Payment Leasing
CASE REPORT OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Diamond Chemicals PLC (B) Merseyside and Rotterdam Projects Table of content Key Issues 3 Analysis 3 Recommendations 8 Appendix 9 Appendix 1: Company Description 7 Appendix 2: Calculation on Merseyside Project Revision 7 Appendix 3: Calculation on Rotterdam Project without Right-of-way 7 KEY ISSUES The Diamond Chemical PLC as the producer of polypropylene has two production plants which are in Merseyside and Rotterdam. Both factories
Premium Net present value
Introduction The following report shows that the proposal of the modernisation project should obtain funding from the corporate headquarters of Victoria Chemicals. The project has an initial outlay of GBP12 million to renovate and rationalise the polypropylene production line at Merseyside plant. This is done in order to make up for deferred maintenance and exploit opportunities to achieve increased efficiency. This report will look at the following four main areas of concern in order
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Discounted cash flow
UV2493 Version 1.5 DIAMOND CHEMICALS PLC (A): THE MERSEYSIDE PROJECT Late one afternoon in January 2001‚ Frank Greystock told Lucy Morris‚ “No one seems satisfied with the analysis so far‚ but the suggested changes could kill the project. If solid projects like this can’t swim past the corporate piranhas‚ the company will never modernize.” Morris was plant manager of Diamond Chemicals’ Merseyside Works in Liverpool‚ England. Her controller‚ Frank Greystock‚ was discussing a capital project that
Premium Net present value Discounted cash flow Cash flow
Case 20: Diamond Chemicals plc (A) --PT07 Group 10 INTRODUCTION: Diamond Chemicals is a large worldwide chemicals producer with two factories in Liverpool England and Rotterdam Holland. Both of their plants were built in 1967 with annual output of 250‚000 metric tons polypropylene. Compare with low-cost producer‚ the production cost per ton is 1.09 which is a little bit high than competitors (see Exhibition 1). With the decline EPS from £60 in 1999 to £30 in 2000 and worldwide economic slowdown
Premium Net present value Discounted cash flow
Corporate Finance Case Discussion : ‘Diamond Chemicals Plc (A)’ 1. Purpose: This case presents the capital investment decision under consideration by executives of a large chemicals firm in January 2001. This involves a go/no-go project evaluation regarding improvements to a polypropylene production plant. A critical assessment of a capital investment evaluation system is the focus of this case. The case also enables discussion on conflicts of interest and other ethical dilemmas that may arise
Premium Finance Corporate finance Discounted cash flow
VICTORIA CHEMICALS plc (A) The Merseyside Project Presented by Group 2 : Aldy Rifianto‚ Dedy Mardianto Floriana Nataly‚ Hiralalitya Lextro Kristiano Concorda Natallia Winata‚ Wita Puspadilla Yosua Bangun THE MERSEYSIDE PROJECT SUMMARY PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION RECOMENDATION SUMMARY • Victoria Chemicals‚ a major competitor in the Worldwide chemicals industry‚ was a leading producer of polypropylene‚ a polymer used in an extremely wide variety of products SUMMARY Victoria Chemicals
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Chemical industry
Executive Summary of Victoria Chemicals Problem Definition: The organization‚ Victoria Chemicals‚ must determine whether or not to improve engineering efficiency through facility improvements at its production plant Merseyside Works. Relevant Facts: The Merseyside Project was evaluated with respect to the following criteria: (1) Impact on earnings per share (2) Payback (3) Discounted cash flow (“DCF”) and (4) Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”). The initial assessment of this project was based
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
the side: 2. Calculate the Sin A and Sin B in each triangle. 3. Calculate. a. Sin 42 b. Cos 68 c. Tan 12 4. Calculate the value of x. a. b. 5. Calculate. a. Sin0.612 b. Cos 0.825 c. Cos d. Tan 6. Calculate E to the nearest degree. a. Sin E = 0.387 b. Sin E = 0. 900 c. Cos E = d. Tan E = 7
Premium
UVA-F-1543 Rev. Mar 9‚ 2011 VICTOR CHEMI RIA ICALS PLC (A): THE MERSEYS C E SIDE PROJ JECT Late one afte L ernoon in Jan nuary 2008‚ Frank Grey ystock told L Lucy Morris “No one s s‚ seems satisfied with the an nalysis so far‚ but the suggested c f changes cou kill the project. If solid uld projects like this can’t swim past the corpora piranhas‚ the compan will never modernize.” l t ate ny r Morris was plant manager of Vict M toria Chemi icals’ Merse eyside Work
Premium Net present value Discounted cash flow Cash flow