"Views of david hume immanuel kant georg hegel and arthur schopenhauer" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 24 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kantian Ethics

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kantian ethics can be used to analyze the moral implications of James’ decision without considering the consequences that occurred afterwards. Immanuel Kant’s theory of morality is based off of two virtues: good will and duty. Kant believed that good will is pure when analyzed morally whether or not the intentions of the good will succeeded or failed. To broaden the critique‚ a person’s good will can also be analyzed alongside a person’s

    Premium Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Kant

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    just your own perception and others will have a different perception of the seemingly same object. Three philosophers of the time‚ Locke‚ Hume‚ and Kant‚ were big proponents of the scientific method and used it in each of their ideas behind morality. While all three follow this way of inquiry‚ Kant’s theories abide by the method better because he proposes

    Premium Scientific method Science Epistemology

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    proving what is” right and what is wrong”. Kant employs his views and thought of metaphysics as a discipline in his ethical philosophy. "if a law is to have moral force. Two of the greatest well known philosophers have thoughts on it and they are Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. Immanuel kant and John Stuart Mill consider the death penalty is fairly right ‚but they gives totally two different opposite thoughts and reasons on why it should be. Immanuel kant has very

    Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs. Mill

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant vs Mills in Animal Rights In this essay I will cover the philosophy of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. I will begin by covering Kant perspective of rational beings and his idea of a priori learning. I will then move on to his idea of categorical imparaitive. After Kant I will discuss Mill’s utilitarian theory regarding pleasure and pain. With a better understanding of those I will move to Mill’s idea of a posteriori and hypothetical imperative. Following the ideas of these philosophers

    Premium Immanuel Kant

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages

    effects of things are produced as per the universality of laws and it is called Nature. Accordingly‚ the universal imperative of duty may be expressed thus: Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature. Kant starts with the simple proposition that it is unfair for a person to do something that others don’t do‚ can’t do‚ or won’t do. If every individual refuses to do the some action which is good like refuse to pay tax‚ it does not fit into Universalist

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Deontological ethics

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary of Georg Simmel

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Simmel‚ G. ([1908] 2012) The Stranger in Calhoun et al. Classical Sociological Theory‚ Wiley/Blackwell‚ pp. 361-365 ‘Objectivity does not simply involve passivity and detachment; it is a particular structure composed of distance and nearness‚ indifference and involvement.’ Simmel is referring to the implied objectivity of the stranger‚ due to their independence from the group. He uses the example of communities bringing in judges or mediators from outside to settle disputes. Simmel proposes

    Premium Sociology

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What makes something right? In the study of philosophy‚ there are many views of what is right and what is wrong. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill have differing viewpoints of this topic. John Stuart Mill has a philosophy known as Utilitarianism. In this way of thinking‚ ethics are based on the maximization of pleasure. In other words‚ it’s based on the consequences of a given action. The basic principle of Utilitarianism is that "actions are right in so far as they tend to promote happiness

    Premium Ethics Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant the Sublime

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages

    how critical thought exists within an infinite amount of creativity with no principles but in search of them. Lyotard understands the Kantian sublime as a way to comply with the standards that critically analyze postmodernism using deconstruction. Kant differentiated the sublime between the vastness and greatness and the dynamic sublime. The vastness sublime is so great we can’t just use our senses like we normally do; it requires us to heighten our senses beyond comprehension. The dynamic sublime

    Premium Human Mind Sublime

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    themselves and their families provide moral justification for the poor work conditions‚ and low wages that sweatshop labor provides? German philosopher Immanuel Kant would argue that there must be changes made in the politics of sweatshops to improve there conditions. Using his idea of the “Categorical Imperative” and treating people as “valuable in themselves” Kant would not completely take away the opportunity for these people to support themselves working in factories but make it a more humane system. Utilitarian

    Premium Immanuel Kant Minimum wage Ethics

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Liberty and Necessity

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Necessity”‚ Hume wants to discuss what liberty and necessity mean and whether or not they can be compatible with each other. This is all really a discussion of Hume’s view of free will and determinism‚ and how they can be easily reconciled through compatibilism where for example both liberty and necessity are required for morality. He starts off by considering the idea of necessity and defines it as‚ “the constant conjunction of similar objects‚ and the consequent inference from one to another” (Hume 150)

    Premium Management Marketing Psychology

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 50