Professor Ballone 14 February 2014 Obscenity in Miller v. California Today in our criminal justice system there exists a policy known as “The Miller Test”. The purpose of this test is to determine whether or not a given substance is obscene or not. It is a test that is frequently used today by police‚ and its significance is clearly obvious. The “Miller Test” is a direct result from the outcome of the U.S Supreme Court decision‚ Miller v. California. In this case‚ a local business owner who specialized
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity Supreme Court of the United States
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Disclaimer II. Acknowledgments III. Table of Contents IV. Introduction V. Objective VI. Methodology VII. Case Study 1. Facts 2. Judgement * By the Trial Court * By the High Court * By the Supreme Court 3. Basis of Judgement 4. Case reference VIII. Sovereign Immunity 1. Journey of the Doctrine 1.1Pre Constitutional Era 1.2 Post Independence and Constitution of India IX. Sovereign Functions &
Premium Constitution of India Common law Police
Arizona v. Gant PALS480-Capstone June 20‚ 2012 The Parties • Plaintiff – State of Arizona • Defendant – Rodney Gant • Appellant – State of Arizona • Respondent – Rodney Gant Procedural History • Respondent‚ Rodney Gant‚ was arrested for driving with a suspended license. Subsequent to the search of the Gant’s vehicle officers found cocaine in the back seat. At trial Gant moved to have the evidence suppressed denied that there was probable cause to search the vehicle‚ but did
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Title: Kennedy v. State‚ 323 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. App. 1984) Facts: A fire was evolved on September 23‚ 1981 in a log cabin due to a hot plate. The hot plate was left on with an accelerant and kerosene near by. The owner of the cabin‚ Henry Xavier Kennedy was convicted of Arson as he obtained an insurance policy for $40K on the cabin five days prior to this fire and police found evidence that the construction business owned by Mr. Kennedy was losing money‚ and Mr. Kennedy’s alibi was insufficient to
Premium Theft Crimes Criminal law
Directors owe various fiduciary duties to the company as they have a fiduciary relationship with the company they are working at. An example of a case will be Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corp ‚ which explained that a significant feature of a fiduciary relationship was that the fiduciary agrees to act on behalf in another party’s interests. At common law‚ directors are required to act in good faith in the best interests
Premium Management Corporation Board of directors
| Scott v. Sanford | [Type the document subtitle] | | Willis Watts | 8/8/2013 | [Type the company name] [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] | Scott v. Sanford The Dred Scott decision of the Supreme Court in March 1857 was one of the major steps on the road to secession. Dred Scott
Premium Slavery in the United States American Civil War Dred Scott v. Sandford
Roper Vs. Simmons By: Alyssa Rosales Instructor name: Ann-Marie Delgado Course: Constitutional Rights/ POSU 344 Roper v. Simmons 543 U.S551 (2005); it will specifically address the arrest‚ trial and the legal issues it raised. It will explain and identify the holdings of the lower courts‚ as well as the decision of the U.S Supreme Court‚ and where the law should be headed. Christopher Simmons‚ who was seventeen years old‚ and two of his friends by the name of Charles Benjamin (fifteen
Premium Capital punishment Roper v. Simmons Supreme Court of the United States
Seminar Assignment – V for Vendetta 2a) Describe the differences between the fascist Norsefire government’s and V’s anarchist view of a “healthy country.” How do Norsefire and V define the role of the government and the role of the citizen differently? The chaos and fury of the violence of the post-apocalyptic Britain initiated the radically right-winged Norsefire regime: fascists that united with the surviving big companies and businesses‚ giving them the appearance
Premium V for Vendetta
drugs to possibly sell them but they should have handled it in a better way. I don’t think that it was right for the police to search his property with out permission or even a warrant because it violates the 4th and 14th amendment‚ which clearly states that The fourth amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides‚ "The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated‚ and no warrants shall issue‚ but upon
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Police
Plessy v. Ferguson In 1896 the Louisiana Supreme Court was challenged with a case that had the potential to tear apart racial segregation in our country. The central question that revolved around this court case was whether or not segregation amongst whites and blacks was still equal. The decision made by the court prolonged unnecessary social/racial inequality‚ oppression‚ hate‚ and violence in our country. The court’s ruling had immutable repercussions that greatly scarred our nation’s history
Premium American Civil War Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States