Today’s computer storage capacity has brought about new controversy surrounding the plain view doctrine in context to a legally executed search warrant of a suspects hard drive in order to find evidence of a particular crime being investigated. When an officer searches a physical location while executing a search warrant and discovers evidence of another crime other than the one being investigated‚ that evidence is said to be in “plain view‚” which can be seized and used to support a criminal prosecution
Premium
will argue for. Paragraph 2—Data: Evidence gathered to support the claim. Warrant (also referred to as a bridge): Explanation of why or how the data supports the claim‚ the underlying assumption that connects your data to your claim. Backing (also referred to as the foundation): Additional logic or reasoning that may be necessary to support the warrant. Paragraph 3—Data: Evidence gathered to support the claim. Warrant (also referred to as a bridge): Explanation of why or how the data supports
Premium Pollution Critical thinking Plug-in hybrid
suspected of drug deals. He observed the area and after a while he speculated drug deals were taking place. Fackrell sees Strieff leaving the residence‚ and stops him for questioning. During the questioning‚ Fackrell discovered there is an outstanding warrant for Strieff and arrest him. While searching strieff lawfully‚ he finds methamphetamine and a drug pipe on Strieff. The case was sent to the district court‚ who ruled that‚ although Fackrell did not have enough evidence to conduct an investigatory
Premium Crime Police Illegal drug trade
evidence would still be valid based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. The good faith exception states “that If officers had a reasonable‚ good-faith belief that they were acting per legal authority‚ such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective‚ the illegally seized evidence is admissible” (Busby‚ 2009). The good faith exception was established by a 6-3 U.S Supreme court decision in the United States v. Leon 468 U.S. 897 (1984). The majority
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
FIN-516 WEEK 1 – HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT Problem Based on Chapter 14‚ Residual Dividends Middlesex Plastics Manufacturing had 2011 Net Income of $15.0 Million. Its 2012 Net Income is forecast to increase by 8%. The company’s capital structure has been 35% Debt and 65% Equity since 2010‚ and the company plans to maintain this capital structure in 2012. The company paid $3.0 Million cash dividends in 2011. The company is planning to invest in a major capital project in 2012. The capital budget
Premium Education Teacher Management
the author’s warrants? Does the author supply backing for the warrants? If yes‚ how? Part 1: What are the author’s warrants? The author believes that educating children about farm life is a waste of time. She goes on to state that children would be better off educated on A.T.M.’s and ring tones. She then refers to a portion of the “Blue’s Room” farming episode as “shocking” in which a puppet demonstrates how to milk a cow. Part 2: Does the author supply backing for the warrants? No‚ she does
Free Education Early childhood education Logic
and may lead to adverse consequences for the officer who engaged in the illegality. This paper covers a simulated case of Minnesota vs. Ronald Riff. The prosecution witness sheets are used to gathering information for Officer Shield to obtain a warrant to search the home of Ronald Riff‚ a suspect in the burglary of Marquette’s Market. Search and Seizure Hypothetical Our constitution is not just a document with significance; but a living body of law‚ which is subject to judicial interpretation
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Exclusionary rule
there growth is going to continue. Is better to pay at a current dividend growth rate at 8%. This way your growth can continue and you own you are able to pay and maintain. Chapter 19-3 on Warrants Maese Industries Inc. has warrants outstanding that permit the holders to purchase 1 share of stock per warrant at a price of $25. a. Calculate the
Premium Stock Dividend Option
prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures (Wikipedia‚ n.d.). “Moreover‚ the Fourth Amendment requires governmental searches to be conducted only upon the issuance of a search warrant‚ sanctioned by probable cause and supported by oath or affirmation‚” (Wikipedia‚ n.d.‚ p.1). The warrant requirement also mandates that the warrant must describe the place to be searched and the person and/or property to be seized. However‚ there are exemptions contained in the “Exclusionary Rule.” Some of the exemptions
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Law
deprivations of liberty and drafted the Fourth Amendment to address it.”). In Albright‚ the Fourth Amendment was declared the proper vehicle for analyzing a malicious prosecution claim. In that case‚ the plaintiff Albright was arrested pursuant to a warrant on suspicion of selling a substance that looked like an illegal drug. Albright posted bond and was released on the condition that he not leave the state without permission. The trial court eventually dismissed the charges against him “on the ground
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution