Police installed wiretaps without a warrant to listen to his phone calls. In a 5-4 decision‚ the Taft Court ruled that the police’s method of wiretapping did not violate Olmstead’s Fourth Amendment right to protection from unreasonable searches and seizures and did not violate his Fifth Amendment protection from self-incrimination. According to the majority‚ a Fourth Amendment violation requires
Premium
Carney‚ 471 U.S. 386‚392 (1985). A fully mobile motor home located in a public place is a vehicle for purposes of the “automobile exception.” Id. The warrantless automobile search doctrine is based upon the inherent mobility of vehicles and the reduced expectation of privacy associated therewith and consequently‚ it applies to both cars on the move on the highway and those‚ which are stationery. Id at 391
Premium Automobile Vehicle Driverless car
Police Encounter Matthew A Loos Kaplan University CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 2 Assignment July 15‚ 2013 Officer Smith‚ in my opinion‚ had reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop on the female driver the night in question. According to (Lasker‚ 2012)‚ “In People v. Hackett‚ 2012 IL 111781‚ a unanimous supreme court overturned the appellate and trial court decisions and remanded the case for a trial based on evidence stemming from what the court held to be a justified "investigatory
Premium Police Criminal law Law
Facts During the fall of 1988‚ staff members of a public hospital located in the city of Charleston by the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) became concerned by “an apparent increase in the use of cocaine by patients who were receiving prenatal treatment.” (Samaha‚ 2012‚ p. 252) In response to the increasing number‚ in April of 1989‚ MUSC instituted a drug testing policy. Women who came into MUSC that presented suspicion of drug use were subjected to the drug screenings. If the tests
Premium Drug addiction Childbirth United States
To: Partner From: Junior Associate Re: DC v Blake INTRODUCTION OF THE ISSUES: Police officers were called to Mr. Smith’s residency regarding a noise violation on February 4th‚ 2007. Officers observed the occupants‚ including Mr. Jonathon Blake‚ through the large front window of the dwelling engaged in activity that appeared to the officers as smoking marijuana. They also witnessed Mr. Blake hand over a small plastic baggie filled with suspected cocaine to another occupant. The officers
Premium Police The Police Crime
When people think of the Watergate Scandal‚ they automatically think about Nixon and his biggest scandal. The Watergate Scandal plus 30 video helped us understand the events that took place more clearly and the interviews that took place put the whole thing into perspective. Nixon was a president during the late 60’s early 70’s. He was a president who had good private morality‚ but not so much public morality. This flaw made him quite paranoid and Nixon felt he needed information to be on top.
Premium United States President of the United States Cold War
CAUSE for a search of the residence. This evidence was used to convict him. The question was whether the initial WARRANTLESS SEARCH of the trash violated the Fourth Amendment. The Court ruled that those discarding their trash by placing it on the street for collection abandoned any REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY they might otherwise have. The two dissenters believed that the warrantless investigation of the trash constituted an appalling invasion of privacy. LEONARD W. LEVY (1992) Source Citation (MLA
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
affairs and rightly gave them distinct powers as commander in chief . However‚ this did not mean that congress was expected to retreat into the background but instead were given the power to declare war and to regulate trade. Furthermore‚ over the years‚ the proclivity of congress to make extensive allocations to presidents have been even more distinct in the area of foreign policy than in domestic policy. In foreign affairs‚ it has typically been seen that presidents have taken advantage of
Premium President of the United States United States United States Congress
References: Arizona v. Gant. (2009). Retrieved November 22‚ 2012‚ from http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/556/07-542/ Calsyn‚ J. D.‚ Hale‚ B. C.‚ Kranz‚ H.‚ Grossman‚ M. R.‚ & Kim‚ N. E. (1998). Warrantless searches and seizures. Georgetown Law Journal‚ 86‚ 1214-1288. Cole‚ G.F.‚ & Smith C. E.‚ (2011) Criminal Justice (6th ed.). Belmont‚ California: Wadsworth. Josephson‚ M. (1996). Fourth amendment--must police knock and announce themselves before
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
of acting without a warrant. In drunk-driving investigations‚ the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not constitute an exigency in every case sufficient to justify conducting a blood test without a warrant IV. Outcome A warrantless blood test of a drunk-driving suspect is reasonable must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances. V. Concurring Justice Kennedy: the way in which it
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution