Megan Randolph RC 250 Marcia Clay 11/3/09 A Summary of Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Study Stanley Milgram‚ a professor of social psychology‚ conducted a research study beginning in July of 1961. This research measured the willingness of participants to either obey or disobey an authority figuring giving them on a conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram set up this experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
The social science “Milgram Experiments” were used to discover of the people would willingly hurt another person because someone of authority told them to do it but the participants were told that the purpose of the experiment was to study memory with punishments. Ethic and moral dilemmas appeared during the experiment that criticized the research and its methods because of its deception and stress that it puts on the volunteers. There are multiple reasons why the experiment could be used to show
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
individuals but products of conformity. Stanley Milgram‚ a Yale psychologist‚ engineered an experiment to test the ordinary person’s level of obedience. Many of Milgram’s colleagues admired his intricate experiment‚ and thought that he provided valid information on the complexity of obedience. One of his colleagues‚ Diana Baumrind‚ however‚ strongly disagreed with Milgram and has good reasons to criticize his experiment. She thought his experiment was unethical and very harmful to the social well-being
Premium Psychology Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment
Stanley Milgram Journal Assignment Draft A psychologist named Stanley Milgram created an invention called the shock generator which included thirty different switches that had ranging voltages. The main question of the experiment is “how long will someone continue to give shocks to another person if they are told to do so‚ even if they thought they could be seriously hurt?” (Milgram Experiment‚ 2008). Of course to conduct any experiment‚ you need participants. Stanley Milgram had forty subjects
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
industry. What is often forgotten is that these companies and individuals are the minority. Every individual can stomp his feet and stand on his soap box and say how he would’ve acted differently if he was placed in the aforementioned individuals’ shoes‚ but that cannot be determined. Conversely‚ the Milgram experiment‚ however controversial‚ proves that a vast majority of people‚ in the right circumstances‚ will physically harm another person based on the orders of a superior. It is hard to refute scientific
Premium Stanford prison experiment Human Psychology
Some of the more famous cases include‚ The Milgram Obedience and Authority experiment‚ The Stanford Prison experiment‚ and of course the Abu Ghraib scandal involving our own U.S. soldiers. While two of these instances were not intended to cause physical harm‚ they were all branded unethical due to the extent of not only the physical abuses that took place‚ but the painful psychological impact it left on those involved. One experiment‚ called The Milgram experiment‚ also raised ethical concern. The
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
necessary element for the prosperity of a society. However‚ I have never expected that authority has such thorough effect on human that it even overwhelms people’s fundamental moral standards until I watched the Milgram experiment during the first lecture. The result of the experiment was very shocking to me – over half of the subjects would keep shocking the ‘learners’ until the end just because the experimenters required them to do so‚ even though the learners cried desperately for help. I think
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
Kayla McNutt Professor Williams English 1101-107 17 September 2013 The Obedience Test Stanley Milgram’s article‚ “The Perils of Obedience” focuses on the experiment he created to test society’s willingness to obey. In the experiment Milgram has one person who is a learner and another who delivers the shocks‚ the teacher. The focus of the experiment is on the person delivering the shocks because the “learner” is an actor. The learner’s role is to recite words to practice memorization.
Premium Stanford prison experiment Shock Milgram experiment
influence the person to then respond by submitting to what they have been told to do. Milgram’s study was done after the trial of Adolf Eichmann. This was after the holocaust where 6 million Jews were murdered. This trial displayed an example of destructive obedience where people were said to have complied with what they were told to do‚ even if it had a negative impact on others‚ which in this case was murdering innocent people‚ although being completely mentally aware of what they were being asked
Premium Adolf Eichmann The Holocaust Social psychology
The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible things. The test is to see if someone would do an awful act just on the basis of someone telling them to. This experiment speaks to the ’nature of responsibility’ and to see if the subject will stop the experiment due to its dangerous nature. The subject is tricked into thinking they are the teacher‚ and the other person in the room‚ an actor‚ is the learner. The teacher will ask the learner a series
Premium Education Psychology Milgram experiment