Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Milgram obedience study. Should the study have taken place? Milgram’s study is a very controversial study as it broke many ethical guidelines and has many methodological issues‚ but it also had many strengths. One strength of the Milgram study on obedience is that the experiment was reliable as it can be replicated and the results are consistent. The fact that the experiment was a Lab experiment makes the study even more reliable as lab experiments are
Free Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Experiment
The Stanford prison experiment was similar to the Milgram experiment because both of the experiments focused on the responses of people when there are underneath authority. Zimbardo was interested in what would happen when you would put good people in an evil place. He also focused on if the situation out of the institution can control your behavior or does your attitude and values will overcome the situation from the negative environment. For Zimbardo negative environment‚ he had created a mock
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
In a series of experiments regarding obeying authority‚ Stanley Milgram found that “the physical presence of an authority is an important force contributing to the subject’s obedience or defiance”. Milgram concluded from his study that the proximity of an authoritative figure plays a huge role in determining whether or not the subject carried out the experiment. Specifically in the case of the
Premium Family Family Milgram experiment
applied to Hoss because he was farther away from the killing process as the Commandant of Auschwitz and did not directly kill the prisoners‚ therefore Hoss felt that the responsibility of the killing lay on the hands of his superiors‚ like Himmler‚ because he was passing down orders from higher authority. The frightening thing about the Milgram experiment is that it proves that Hoss’ makeup was not dissimilar from that of any ordinary person and if any ordinary person was put in the situation of Hoss
Premium Nazism Adolf Hitler Nazi Germany
The Controversy of Obedience A classic experiment on the natural obedience of individuals was designed and tested by a Yale psychologist‚ Stanley Milgram. The test forced participants to either go against their morals or violate authority. For the experiment‚ two people would come into the lab after being told they were testing memory loss‚ though only one of them was actually being tested. The unaware individual‚ called the “teacher” would sit in a separate room‚ administering memory related
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
reasons behind the Milgram and Zimbardo experiments. These experiments were to test people’s obedience to authority - or a man in a lab coat. Milgram’s experiment was the first of its kind‚ seeing as how similar experiments were repeated afterward‚ and he wanted to prove that authority was a major part in why people listened to others. This experiment was started after a german soldier claimed he shouldn’t be prosecuted for torturing people during World War Two because he was ‘just following orders’
Premium Prison Crime Criminal justice
like he did not have respect for his mom nor did it seem like he treasured his mom‚ after she visited him in jail. She was very sick as well. This shows how much Luke has a problem with authority because of the way he talks to his mom. And his learning of authority starts with where he learned authority.This is relevant to the participants in the Milgram experiment. Because there was the few people that refused to continue with the experiment despite
Premium English-language films Family Star Wars
Nazi’s Adolf Eichmann said‚ “I was just following orders to kill Jews”. This clearly illustrates that he only did what he did‚ followed orders‚ because he was told to and he felt like an agent to Adolf Hitler. Milgram also posed the idea of something called moral strain. This is when you obey an order although it goes against your morals‚ you feel that what you are doing is wrong but you have no choice. An example of this is in the study of obedience carried out by Milgram. The participants objected
Premium Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler Adolf Eichmann
Milgram (1963) vs. Meeus and Raaijmakers (1985) (12 marks) The aim of both studies was to test obedience. Meeus and Raaijmakers were testing psychological violence‚ where Milgram was testing physical violence. The procedure was similar‚ as in both experiments the participants were paid volunteers and had to give an increasing punishment. The Dutch experiment was conducted in a natural experiment though and and Milgram’s one - in a university. The results of both studies support each other’s
Premium Experiment
inflicted upon another person. "The Perils of Obedience" by Stanley Milgram reports on his controversial experiment that test how far individuals would go in obeying orders‚ even if carrying out those orders caused serious harm to others. This experiment caused a lot of controversy and one woman in particular believed that this experiment was immoral. Diana Baumrind’s "Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience" says that Milgram "entrapped" (329) his subjects and potentionally harmed his subjects
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology