a name which will live forever in infamy. After just one year as a member he was the leader of the National Socialist German Workers’ party. In the 1930s and 40s‚ he rose to power and became a dictator of Germany. During his time in that position‚ he committed many atrocities. By the end of the war‚ he had killed over 6 million people and committed genocide against Jews (Witherbee 1). Although it wasn’t justified‚ there are reasons he is this way. There were social‚ cultural‚ and economic influences
Premium Adolf Hitler Germany World War II
and preserving virtue in society. In some cases murder can be justified (such as self defense)‚ but in the case of Captain Oram‚ fifteen accounts of first-degree murder cannot. Captain Oram’s cowardice hasty judgment‚ and no one’s right to play God caused the death of these men. Captain Oram is not justified for the deaths of fifteen of his men. Captain Oram was a cowardice leader who led to the deaths if fifteen innocent men. He was weak and cowardice because he wasn’t a communicative leader
Premium Decision making Decision theory Decision making software
unskilled and inexperienced torturers is always unjustified. 4. However‚ institutionalising torture has very bad consequences; it will mean that torture will metastasise instead of being limited to one-off cases. 5. Conclusion: Torture is never justified (one should never torture). This can be an additional argument for the theory of deontology‚ as are we professional tortures? Nowadays‚ a lot of the governments in the world have stopped torturing by law. Approximately‚ 45% countries in the world
Premium Psychology Management Thought
Can terrorism ever be justified? Since the turn of the century‚ the postmodern world has seen increasing levels of political‚ cultural‚ military and socio-economic tumult‚ much of this due to a series of terrorist attacks on American soil and the resultant waging of Washington ’s “War on Terror”. Consequently‚ the nature of terrorism has come under intense media focus and is subject to immense debate‚ especially on its justification. Before engaging in such a debate one must first identify terrorism
Premium Terrorism Al-Qaeda September 11 attacks
Harris Case Analysis Objective: Should Harris invest into the shrimp processing plant? Issues: 1. Will this processing plant have a value today that is greater than or equal to the cost today? -If the NPV of the plant is greater than zero‚ then we should move forward with the investment. NPV Analysis: Value> Cost Value: PV: Value right now PV= forecast of future cash returns (FCR) -We used FCR to determine how much cash we get back and can deem the plan a good investment if we can
Premium Investment Net present value Finance
elsevier.com/locate/engfailanal Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines – gouges and dents K.A. Macdonald b a‚* ‚ A. Cosham b a University of Stavanger‚ 4036 Stavanger‚ Norway Penspen Integrity‚ Newcastle Business Park‚ Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YL‚ UK Received 12 July 2004; accepted 13 December 2004 Available online 13 April 2005 Abstract Oil and gas transmission pipelines have a good safety record and are a demonstrably safe means of transporting hydrocarbons
Premium
Edmund Gettier challenged the classical analysis of knowledge as justified true belief‚ demonstrating two cases where a true and justified belief is held‚ but not necessarily knowledge - Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? (1963). Showing that justification is insufficient for demarcating mere true beliefs from knowledge as belief and truth can correlate by luck. In what follows‚ section-one will outline the classical analysis of knowledge and Gettier’s challenge to it‚ focusing on Gettier’s first
Premium Epistemology Plato Belief
would not be justified. Or how no one should ever be killed because it is not the right thing to do. However‚ in George’s mind he was simply putting Lennie out of misery; he felt that he was showing mercy. In conclusion‚ George’s action in killing Lennie was justified because he felt that he should be the one to help take the grief from him because the other men were determined to kill him out of hate and rage. One reason george was justified in the decision he made of killing Lennie was the fact
Premium KILL Murder John Steinbeck
There were times in history when breaking the law was justified: great leaders like Gandhi and Martin Luther King broke the law and changed the world for the better. Breaking the law is morally justifiable and acceptable when the law in itself is iniquitous and if that law violates human rights and conscience; Certainly‚ rules are established for us to follow but we as human beings should be able to differentiate the right and the wrong and incase laws need to be violated for the right cause even
Premium United States World War II Nonviolence
Imagine what the world would be like if everyone thought that lying was acceptable. In the play the Crucible by Arthur Miller and in the noel A Break with Charity by Ann Ranadi‚ both include characters with different morals. Characters such as Abigail Williams from the Crucible and Ann Putnam from A Break with Charity‚ believe that‚ lying is not as big of a deal as it really is‚ because it does not affect them in any way‚ it only affects the people around them. Unlike Abigail and Ann‚ there are characters
Premium Salem witch trials The Crucible John Proctor