Comparing Extreme Programming and Waterfall Project Results Feng Ji Carnegie Mellon University Silicon Valley Campus Mountain View‚ CA‚ 94035 jojojifeng@gmail.com Todd Sedano Carnegie Mellon University Silicon Valley Campus Mountain View‚ CA‚ 94035 todd.sedano@sv.cmu.edu Abstract Waterfall and Extreme Programming are two software project methods used for project management. Although there are a number of opinions comparing the two methods regarding how they should be applied‚ none
Premium Agile software development Extreme Programming
INTRODUCTION Sustainable refurbishment provides great capacity for addressing much of the environmental‚ economic and‚ in particular‚ social sustainability goals through‚ for example‚ involvement of residents in project design and implementation. However‚ there is a great deal of work that must be done to develop the institutional framework for facilitating sustainable refurbishment activity. A sustainable building is one in which the design team have struck a balance between environmental‚
Premium Sustainability Green building Efficient energy use
time they develop a phase in order to deliver high quality product to customer. 4. Advantages of Agile Model over Waterfall Model • Agile model is adaptable to change i.e. after implementation; changes can be made easily which is not possible in case of Waterfall model. • Bugs can be found easily as one has a READY TO LAUNCH product at the end of tested phase whereas in Waterfall model‚ testing is done at the very end so the bugs are found at the end. • In agile approach‚ better object oriented
Premium Psychology Management Mind
In this essay I will compare two well-known and widely used methods of software development‚ the traditional Waterfall Method and the more recently established Agile Method. The Waterfall method is a structured‚ linear approach that breaks down the software development process‚ or life-cycle‚ into distinct stages. The Agile method is just as the name states‚ it is flexible and adaptable. It breaks the development process into smaller segments defined by deliverable goals‚ each segment runs through
Premium Software development process Agile software development Waterfall model
Team Team Id Team NameGrading Player Name | CLUB Club nameClub Address Club Phone Club Email | TEAMCLUBTeam Id Club Name | MATCH RESULTWinning teamResultOver’s played Player matchCOACHCoach Id Coach NameCoach AddressCoach PhoneCoach Email | PLAYER Player IdPlayer NamePlayer AddressClub NameTeam
Premium Relational model
Examine the case for the waterfall life cycle. Does the waterfall life cycle still play a useful role in modern system development‚ and if so‚ at which stages? The waterfall life cycle model in software engineering was originally designed in 1970 by Winston.W.Royce. The waterfall life cycle model plays a linear act of moving forward of framework activities that is often inconsistent in some field of the software world. In situations where requirements are well defined and stable‚ it is applicable
Free Waterfall model Software development process Iterative and incremental development
I answered this question by explaining that the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) also known as “the waterfall model" is an extremely valuable tool to use in the implementation or revamping of any company. The Systems Development Life Cycle provides a strategic foundation in which a company can either update its existing system‚ or a company can create an entirely new system from scratch. There are seven phases to the Systems Development Life Cycle‚ and each phase must be completed in order‚
Premium Systems Development Life Cycle Software development Information systems
... 6 2.2 The future is Managing competitiveness in the FMCG industry .......................................................... 8 2.3 Strategic response to grab the opportunities in the FMCG sector as a result of increasing disposable income in Srilanka ................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 How will marketing going to change?.........................................................................
Premium Marketing Fast moving consumer goods Sri Lanka
as they want. No1: Developing market for “VEGE CHIPS” Our target market is two different countries Srilanka and Canada. These two countries are different from each other. They are totally different in socially and culturally. So our target market also different for these two countries. Country profile Srilanka: Population 21‚481‚334 (July 2011 est.) Age structure 0-14 years: 24.9% (male 2‚705‚953/female 2‚599‚717)
Premium Marketing Middle class Nutrition
Inference on above comparison. |Comparison between Srilanka and Maldives on economic facts and figures | | |Factor |Maldives |Srilanka |Inference
Premium Literacy Sri Lanka United States dollar