R. v. Tutton‚ [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. Arthur Thomas Tutton Respondent and Carol Anne Tutton Respondent indexed as: r. v. tutton File No.: 19284. 1987: November 10; 1989: June 8. Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz*‚ Estey*‚ McIntyre‚ Lamer‚ Wilson‚ Le Dain*‚ La Forest and L ’Heureux-Dubé JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law -- Criminal negligence -- Necessaries of life -- Manslaughter -- Diabetic child dying
Premium Criminal law
Opinion on the Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Case As the opinion delivered by Justice Stevens‚ the U.S. Supreme Court intended to answer the significant question in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue‚ Inc. (Mosley case) that “whether objective proof of actual injury to the economic value of a famous mark is a requisite for relief under the 1996 Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA)”. 1 Contrary to lower courts’ holdings‚ the Supreme Court stated in a unanimous decision that it is not enough to claim
Premium Trademark Property Supreme Court of the United States
Anne Cook Misty Stroud‚ PhD CHM 151; CRN 25017 1 March 2013 Tesla vs. Edison Everyone knows who Thomas Edison is‚ and many attribute the “invention of electricity” to Edison‚ but this is simply not accurate. The truth is‚ while Thomas Edison did patent and market DC‚ or direct current‚ electricity‚ he did not “invent” electricity‚ and as a matter of fact‚ much of his work was actually basically stolen from other scientists‚ among them‚ one brilliant scientist‚ Nikola Tesla. We are
Premium Alternating current Electricity Nikola Tesla
CONSERVATISM V. LIBERALISM Conservatism v. Liberalism Kayla Crissinger West Harrison High School 1 CONSERVATISM V. LIBERALISM 2 Abstract This paper examines the structures of conservatism and liberalism in its most basic forms. It explores several different sources of information containing different views upon the true definition of “conservatism” and “liberalism” and how the two groups interact among each other. This paper an
Premium Conservatism Liberalism Political spectrum
legal standing of the doctrine of ’separate legal personality ’ as it was developed in Salomon v. Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22. Even though this doctrine is the stone head of the English company common law‚ the courts introduced several exceptions which undermined the ’veil of incorporation ’. The exceptions were firstly introduced in the mid-60s by Lord Denning in Littlewoods Mail Order Stores Ltd. V IRC [1969]‚ and allowed the court to lift the veil and hold the shareholders liable for the company
Premium Corporation Corporations law Legal entities
Customer Relationship Management Helps Chase Card Services Manage Customer Calls Q1: what function of customer relationship management systems are illustrated in this case? Ans: The functions of customer relationship management systems that are illustrated are touch point‚ which is a method of interaction with the customer such as a telephone‚ email‚ customer service desk‚ conventional mail‚ website‚ wireless device or retail store. Another CRM system that is used is an Analytical CRM which
Premium Customer relationship management
Suman Siva Prof. Jeong Chun Phuoc 012014111647 Assignment 2 – Weekly Case Law Critique WEEK 2 CASE LAW ON DONOGHUE V STEVENSON (1932) Summary On August 26th 1928‚ Donoghue (plaintiff) and a friend were at a case in Glasgow‚ Scotland. Her friend ordered / purchased a bottle of ginger beer for Donoghue. The bottle was in an opaque bottle (dark glass material) as Donoghue was not aware of the contents. After‚ Donoghue drank some and her friend lifted the bottle to pour the remainder of the ginger
Premium Law Duty of care Tort
1. Introduction Rarely any physician intends to harm patients when he or she provides treatment to them. Patients see physicians and specialists in full faith that they will get help with a condition. What complicates the patient-doctor relationship is that the outcome of each patient’s treatment is different because of individual health conditions and the course of treatment chosen by the doctor. Problems arise when a patient is not satisfied with care provided by the doctor or in extreme
Premium Physician Medicine Supreme Court of the United States
Assignment 2: The Statutes- Pace v. Alabama & Loving v. Virginia Ashlee R. Hall PAD 525: Constitution & Administrative Law Dr. Lee January 29‚ 2012 Was there ever a period in history where interracial marriages and sex among people of different races was considered illegal? As absurd as this idea sounds‚ the answer is yes. Astonishingly‚ less than 40 years ago marrying someone of a different race was considered illegal. Black people could not be with white people- it just
Premium Marriage Same-sex marriage
Professor Ballone 14 February 2014 Obscenity in Miller v. California Today in our criminal justice system there exists a policy known as “The Miller Test”. The purpose of this test is to determine whether or not a given substance is obscene or not. It is a test that is frequently used today by police‚ and its significance is clearly obvious. The “Miller Test” is a direct result from the outcome of the U.S Supreme Court decision‚ Miller v. California. In this case‚ a local business owner who specialized
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity Supreme Court of the United States