Mathematics in Our World. 1.) “Move the constant term to the right side of the equation. x2 – 2x – 13 = 0 x2 – 2x = 13 2.) “Multiply each term in the equation by four times the coefficient of the x2 term.”: x2 – 2x = 13 4x2 – 8x = 52 3.) “Square the coefficient of the original x term and add it to both sides of the equation.”: 4x2 – 8x = 52 4x2 – 8x + 4 = 52 + 4 4x2 – 8x + 4 = 56 4.) “Take the square root of both sides.”: 4x2 – 8x + 4 = 56 2x – 2 = +/- √56 5.)
Premium Polynomial Prime number Real number
Intentional Tort of Defense Erica Davis Introduction to Tort June 7‚ 2012 Facts On a Saturday night there were an incident between two males and a female in a bar called Bottom’s Up. A man name John had too much to drink and was intoxicated. He was shouting obscenities toward a lady name Jane that was sitting at a table next to another guy name Leroy‚ which he was a frequent customer. However‚ Jane ignored John and continued to drink her beer. When she ignored him than he approached her looking
Premium Tort law Injury Grammatical person
3. Given the following data: Job M1 M2 (processing times at machine 1 and 2) A 9 12 B 13 9 C 8 20 D 11 7 E 16 18 F 18 22 G 14 13 What is the minimum makespan? Answer: In order to find the minimum makespan for the two macines we can apply Johnson’sRule: Step 1: Look at the processing
Premium Manufacturing Mathematics Problem solving
Issues Identified: 1. Whether William has an action in common negligence against Edmund. 2. Whether Sam has action in rescuer’s duty against Edmund 3. Whether William has an action in vicarious liability against TCS 4. Whether Sam has an action in vicarious liability against TCS Pleadings: 1. William v Edmund A. Duty of care Foreseeability – there will be accidents if bus isn’t checked properly and if Edmund doesn’t watch the road. Fair just reasonable. Proximity – safety of William depended
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
GROUP ASSIGNMENT 8: Tort of Negligence Issue 1: Chew’s Losses - $300‚000‚ Anxiety‚ Medical bills and the Closure of his stall. Suing Chew under misrepresentation A special relationship between Chew and Don [Hedley Byrne v Heller] Representor has reasonable grounds to believe his statement was true. Is a term; as Chew would not invest in the bonds if not for Don’s words. Sue for negligent misrepresentation (Using “But-for” test to assess damages) Suing under the Tort of Negligence‚ Chew has
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE - DUTY OF CARE EXISTENCE OF A DUTY Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562‚ • Lord Atkin attempted to lay down a general principle which would cover all the circumstances where the courts had already held that there could be liability for negligence. He said: "The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law‚ you must not injure your neighbour; and the lawyer’s question‚ Who is my neighbour? … You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which
Premium Duty of care Tort Reasonable person
of Patient-Centered Care. Annals of Family Medicine‚ 9 (2)100-103. doi:10.1370/afm.1239 Bertakis‚ K.‚ Azari‚ R. (2010). Patient Centered- Care is Associated with Decreased health care utilization. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine‚ 24 (3) 22-239. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.03.100170
Premium Nursing Patient Physician
Concurrent liability Text [13.45] – [13.65]‚ [13.80] – [13.120] Vicarious liability is the liability of an employer for a tort committed by an employee within the course of employment Stevens v Brodribb sawmilling the existence of control between an employer and employee is not enough to prove a relationship for vicarious liability. Further criteria such as obligation to work‚ hours to work etc is also considered Elazac pty ltd v Sheriff the plaintiff was not an employee but a contractor
Premium Tort law Tort
her mother that she also lied. This response may involve which fallacy? Student Answer: CORRECT Ad hominem (tu quoque) Ad verecundiam (ex libris) INCORRECT Ad misericordiam (ex ante) Ad baculum (antebellum) 3. Question : “That coin‚ when flipped‚ will either come up heads or tails" may commit which fallacy? CORRECT No fallacy committed INCORRECT False dichotomy Begging the question 4. Question : "If that wasn’t illegal
Free Fallacy Logical fallacies Ad hominem
bookkeeping‚ administrative‚ first line supervisors‚ and some human resources. Being that my current degree program is concentrated in human resources it is good to know that I have the skills deemed necessary by O*Net to work in a human resources position. 3. Working as a human resources professional conducting a job analysis using O*Net would be beneficial. I would use this site to compare what other companies are looking for in their employees. What requirements they have and what kind of personalities
Premium Employment Hamburger