"What are key differences between the ontological teleological and cosmological arguments" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 8 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What is Philosophy of religion?  is a branch of philosophy that asks questions about religion. Philosophy of religion is a branch of philosophy that asks questions about religion. It addresses not only the perennial question “Is there a God?” but also the questions If there is‚ then what is he like? and‚ most important of all‚ What does that mean for us? 2. Give a brief history of the “philosophies” of religion. Ancient Philosophy‚Medieval Philosophy‚ Early Modern Philosophy‚ Nineteenth-Century

    Premium Philosophy Religion Metaphysics

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments for God’s Existence • Cosmological Argument: Every effect has a cause. The Universe exists and since something cannot come from nothing‚ then God exists. • Theological Argument: Since the universe is ordered and has a useful arrangement then‚ the universe must have a free and intelligent cause. • Anthropological Argument: Since man was created in the image of God‚ he possesses characteristics of God. A blind force could never create man. • Moral Argument: Man has a sense of Morality or

    Premium Existence Metaphysics God

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    types of arguments that speak about the existence of God. One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of a completely perfect God is  Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God. It is indeed adequate for establishing the necessary existence of the Greatest Conceivable Being. Although there are several different versions of the argument‚ all pretend to show that it is contradictory to deny that there is a greater possible being. Therefore‚ in this general line of argument‚ it is

    Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain Aquinas’ Cosmological Argument Thomas Aquinas developed five ways to prove Gods existence. The first three are key to the Cosmological argument. These are from motion‚ causation‚ and contingency. He presented his work on these in the Summa Theologica‚ where he accepts that it may be impossible to prove the God of Classical theism caused the universe to exist‚ but believes that what God does proves Gods existence. The first way is from motion‚ Aquinas emphasises that motion means changes

    Premium Cosmological argument Metaphysics Existence

    • 939 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    St. Anselm (1033/34-1109)‚ was abbot of Bec and later archbishop of Canterbury (pg. 444). The Ontological Argument‚ has two basic arguments that God exists and there is not greater being than God. Anselm’s main goal is to deepen the love and understanding of God‚ and uses natural theology. This is the study of what could be know about God independently of special revelation. His argument is that we can only think of things that exists in our reality. If we can think of it‚ it already exists‚ like

    Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ontological Argument Essay A:Explain the traditional forms of the Ontological argument as put forward by Anselm and Descartes: When considering an argument for God‚ the ontological argument is one of the most intriguing. Mainly because of it’s a priori nature‚ differing from other popular theological arguments which are a posteriori such as the cosmological argument. This means the ontological argument is understood to be true analytically on its own terms without an appeal to experience. Because

    Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline Descartes’ Ontological Argument and explain the key objections that may be used against it. Descartes took the Ontological Argument as presented by Anselm and developed it in a different form. Descartes saw the argument in terms of necessary existence. For Descartes‚ the idea of God necessarily entails his existence. He established that our thoughts are evidence of our own existence (‘I think therefore I am’)‚ and so wanted to see what else he could prove exists. He used the example of a

    Premium Ontology Metaphysics Logic

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To deny the conclusion of the Cosmological argument is to accept the truth of a number of seemingly controversial empirical claims. The sceptic’s forced acceptance of these empirical claims imposes upon them a smaller set of possible worlds which are consistent with the non-existence of a God. Thus‚ in this regard the Cosmological argument remains firmly ‘alive’ as what Swinburne calls a ‘correct C-Inductive argument’‚ as it succeeds in adding to the probability of the theistic conclusion . Peterson

    Premium Logic Existence Metaphysics

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm considers that‚ raising against Ontological Argument from side of creature(human) that was created by creator(God) is absurd‚ however personally I am not the only one who disagrees with this statement. First of all I will summarize Anselm’s Ontological Argument‚ than I will go on to object to his argument through Immanuel Kant’s argument and defend Immanuel Kant’s argument threw the Anselm’s and Rowe’s arguments. The formation of Ontological Argument started in eleventh century by St.Anselm

    Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heidegger‚ Kant‚ and the Ontological Argument In the introduction to The Basic Problems of Phenomenology‚ Martin Heidegger explains that throughout the history of philosophy‚ there has been many discoveries of the “domains of being” viz.‚ “nature‚ space‚ and soul”.1 Yet‚ none of these discoveries could be understood in a way that explains “their specific being.”2 As an example‚ Heidegger interprets this problem as the reason Plato understood why the soul‚ along with its logos‚ was a different

    Premium Ontology Philosophy Martin Heidegger

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 50