Kelcey PHIL 1320 Brant September 23‚ 2010 An Argument against Egoism I shall argue that the ideas of both psychological and ethical egoism are fundamentally flawed and should not be practiced. Egoism is flawed because it ignores the fact that people have a predisposition for compassion toward others that cannot be completely expelled from their motives of action. Egoism is also flawed due to the fact that altruism cannot coexist with egoism; therefore‚ because there is altruism in the world
Free Ethical egoism Egoism Individualism
Paper 1 (A) The Ring of Gyges Argument The bottom line of Thrasymarchus’ argument is that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates agrees that being just is advantageous. He continues to persuade Thrasymarchus‚ however‚ that justice is not only advantageous for the stronger‚ but for everyone. Glaucon refuses to accept Thrasymarchus’ capitulation to Socrates’ arguments. Glaucon’s view is that Socrates has only highlighted the positive consequences of being just and not the intrinsic value
Premium Ethics Justice Plato
Curtis’s clearly illustrates the premises of his conclusion. His argument is valid‚ relevant‚ and strong for several reasons. First‚ Curtis’ argument in (3) that cats are low maintenance is true. He illustrates that two critical premises showing cats are more independent than dogs. His first premise of no sub-zero walks at 6 a.m. is unfair because not all dogs have to walk outside at 6 a.m.‚ but dogs require walks for exercises and engage their environment. If a person who likes to stay indoors
Premium
organization of an argument essay are : Introduction. An objective summary of opposing views including their strengths‚ A point by point discussion of the limitations of opposing views‚ A summary of your viewpoint and your understanding of the issue‚ A point by point discussion of both strengths and limitations of your position‚ arguing overall that yours is superior‚ and a conclusion that drives home your thesis and looks to the future. 2. The main contention of a complex argument is a contention
Premium Writing Essay Critical thinking
that these two arguments each have the same logical pattern or form: If A then B. A. Therefore‚ B. This pattern‚ as we have seen‚ is called modus ponens. Arguments with this pattern consist of one conditional premise‚ a second premise that asserts as true the antecedent (the if part) of the conditional‚ and a conclusion that asserts as true the consequent (the then part) of the conditional. Other common varieties of hypothetical syllogisms include • chain argument • modus
Free Logic
Plato’s imperfection argument is concerned with the existence of forms and our possession of priori concepts that is knowledge that is not gained from empirical evidence but rather through deduction. Plato basis the argument on the imperfection of sensible objects and how we make judgments about them. He denotes the forms to being the perfect object and stresses that the sensible ones are only imperfectly approximate meaning although they seem holistic they are lacking. He focuses on the form of
Premium Epistemology Aristotle Plato
The first argument is by J.J Thomson regarding abortion when it happens during consensual sex. She says that the woman has no obligation to keep the child‚ even though the woman had consensual sex and understood that she could become pregnant. Marquis talks about how everyone has a FLO account‚ and abortion would be killing‚ and killing causes premature death‚ so therefore‚ he believes that abortion is immoral in all cases including consensual sex. Judith Jarvis Thomson gives an analogy when it
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
The existence of God has always been a commonly asked question in the world today. Since there is no scientifically proven answer‚ arguments have been accumulated over time. One being the Pascal Wager’s argument. This theory states that either God exists or God does not exist‚ you can either wager for God or wager against God. This belief advocates the belief in God rather than providing evidence. Does Pascal’s Wager commit the fallacy of appealing to consequences? Each individual mental processes
Premium
conservatives are completely against gay marriage; and many of liberals are fighting for equal treatment. The neo-Christian politicians are using religious arguments to establish that homosexuality is an abomination. While this may be their belief system‚ this country was founded on religious freedom‚ where the people are allowed to worship how they see fit. These two polarized views have created gay marriage to be a very coarse topic among Americans. Recently three states have legalized gay marriage. Can this
Premium Homosexuality Marriage Same-sex marriage
Discuss Girard’s argument that violence is at the core of every religion and examine the scapegoat theory Around the world violence and war are being carried out in the name of religion‚ not just in today’s society but throughout history. René Girard argues that violence is at the core of every religion‚ and by the ways that the media portray religious conflict could lead many people to agree. This essay will be explaining his argument and examining the key points‚ in order to understand his view
Premium Blame Victimisation Religion