October 28‚ 2009 Courts Courtroom Observations On October 8‚ 2009 I attended a general sessions court at the Lexington County Courthouse. At this time the Judge was hearing guilty pleas. There were many people in the rather large courtroom that day. The courtroom was much larger than the one I had visited during drug court here in Spartanburg. Before the day’s session began I could see many defense attorneys going over their cases with their clients‚ some of whom were wearing bright orange
Premium Judge Jury Lawyer
“You be the Judge” Week 5 Courtroom Observation Paper Research BUSI 301 Liberty University Indiana Northern District Court Judges: Chief Justice Raymond‚ Brown‚ Uphold‚ Batten‚ Grambo‚ Wray‚ Bryant‚ Cross and Allen Case Number: 80a14-5352-vc804 Plaintiff: Debora White Plaintiff Representatives: Ashley Gavin and Jackson Riley Defendant: O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs Defendant Representatives: Xander Barden and Katelyn Lippa Defendant Council Overview:
Premium God Intoxication Alcohol intoxication
Communication in the courtroom Peggy S. Torres Western International University CRB-360-3722-Communication Criminal Justice-03/2010 Professor Raymond November April 5‚ 2010 Communication in the courtroom Introduction Communication influences the way people perceive one another and how facts are interpreted. Information given and received is dependant on how successful the communication is conveyed. Communication in a courtroom involves several participants‚ similar to a theatrical
Premium Jury Communication Nonverbal communication
Courtroom Observation.doc The 2008 2L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law presented a case which was argued before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana‚ case number 82A04-8876-CV-285‚ Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties‚ L.L.C.‚ d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern. The courtroom procedure’s purpose is to argue the motion of summary judgment with regards to the case of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties
Free Alcoholic beverage
Semester: _Autumn 2014 (E14)_ Module Title: _Corporate Hospitality_ Programme _BSc (Honours)_ Level: _Level 5_ Format: _Group Pitch and Individual Reflective Report‚ plus_ _Examination_ Presentation: _Yes_ Any special _All work should be submitted on the Student Portal along with_ requirements: _an acceptable Turnitin Report_ Word Limit: _Total of 1‚500 words (with 10% plus or minus leeway) for_ _Individual Reflective Report_ Learning outcomes Identify and
Premium Group Ethics Reflection
Jomar Work Teams and Groups Group output and productivity -are essential concern of people managing organizations. Expected because whatever the group do‚ the organization is affected. What are groups Group- may be defined as two or more persons‚ interacting and interdependent‚ who have come together to achieve certain objectives. Groups may be classified as; 1. Formal Group -defined by the organization structure‚ with designated work assignments and established tasks. 2. Informal group -type
Premium Member of Parliament
Courtroom Observation Liberty University presented a case of White v. Gibbs which is about Mrs. Debbie White and Patrick Gibbs under the civil provisions of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act‚ Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. In this case Mrs. Debbie White sued Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Because White and Gibbs do not live in the same states‚ the suit was brought in diversity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. However‚ the suit will be decided under Indiana state
Premium Alcoholic beverage
Introduction Personal growth and development as a group participant McDermott (2002) suggests that groups are defined by consisting of at least two persons‚ that share space and share a purpose. The interactions taking place amongst members may be important in the development of common goals‚ norms and roles‚ and some sense of belonging. Within the context of a group‚ participants find the possibility of making comparisons between themselves and others‚ which can become an influential source
Premium Leadership Group dynamics Kurt Lewin
Group Theories at Work How do groups function? This is the question that many ask when trying to explain why groups are important to work environments‚ and why individuals seem to work better when in a group. The theories that try to explain the behavior of groups are varied and complex. One of the simplest theories is the 4-M Model of Leadership Effectiveness. This theory states that there are four basic functions of leadership within groups. These functions are “Modeling leadership behavior‚
Premium Leadership Management
A group with a positive dynamic is easy to spot. Team members trust one another‚ they work towards a collective decision‚ and they hold one another accountable for making things happen. As well as this‚ researchers have found that when a team has a positive dynamic‚ its members are nearly twice as creative as an average group. Reductionism and Coordination Tasks Let us examine how reductionism applies to coordination tasks. The probability that a group will contain an incompetent member increases
Premium Logic