CONTENTS Introduction 1 History of Stark Law 2 Key Concepts 3 General Prohibition Under Stark Law 3 Financial Relationships 4 Exceptions 4 Stark Law vs. Anti-kickback Statutes 4 Enforcement of Stark Law 5 Compliance with Stark Law 6 Examples of Problems 6 Compliance Plan 7 Risk of Not Making Repayments 8 Physician Recruitment 9 Conclusion 10 References 11 Introduction
Premium Stark Law Medicine Hospital
Weekly Case-studies for Small Group Seminars Semester 1‚ 2012 Week 2 case study Deciding what legislation means Case-study: The toxic waste Late in the afternoon on 1 December 2009 Alex Demetriou‚ who owns a waste removal business‚ collects a truckload of contaminated soil from excavations at a building site in Melbourne. He drives the full truck back to his company’s yard in Werribee. He leaves it parked there overnight‚ intending
Premium Contract
foreseeably cause us harm or loss. What is a tort? • The Law of Torts is concerned with minimum standards of conduct expected between people. • To establish liability for a tort you have to go to court (ie. your right to expect certain conduct is conferred by law). Liability in tort is based upon a ‘relationship of liability’ existing between people‚ in contrast to contractual rights which are based on the ‘relationship of agreement’ between parties to a contract. Aim and elements
Premium Contract
Constitutional Law Notes What is a Constitution? • Constitutional government is a government that as a Constitution which limits the powers of political authorities and is not susceptible to easy modification or abrogation • Constitution as Paramount Law o A law overriding all other laws (laws must comply with the Constitution or will be deemed invalid) Will not be able to be amended through an ordinary statute o Determines the power of each area of government (separation of powers) o
Free Separation of powers Law Supreme Court of the United States
Study Unit 1. Activity 1. Column A: Public law | Column B: Private law | * Is aimed at the public interest. | * It furthers individual or private interests | * Orders the relationship between the state and individual. | * Orders the respective rights and obligations of private persons. | * Its a vertical relationship | * It is a horizontal relationship | * Denotes a relationship of authority | * Relationship are agreed on equal terms. | Self evaluation 1.
Premium Ethics Law Education
from the High Court decision in Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Dredge “Willemstad” (1976). Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Dredge “Wilemstad” (1976) and Perre & Ors v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) has been important cases in the history of Tort Law. Negligence is a complex term including advertent and inadvertent acts and omissions where there has been a failure to take reasonable care to prevent loss‚ damage or injury to others whom they could reasonably have foreseen might have been injured
Premium Tort Common law Tort law
Customary International Law in the 21st Century: Old Challenges and New Debates 1. Roozbeh (Rudy) B. Baker* 1. *Adjunct Professor of Law‚ Pepperdine University‚ Malibu‚ Cal. BA‚ University of California at San Diego; JD‚ University of Illinois; LLM‚ University of California at Berkeley; PhD Candidate (Politics and International Relations)‚ University of Southern California. Email:Rudy.Baker{at}yahoo.com. Next Section Abstract This article will survey the new non-traditional scholarship which
Premium Law Common law
Rizal Law An Act to include in the curricula of all public and private schools‚ colleges and universities courses on the life‚ works and writings of Jose Rizal‚ particularly his novels‚ Noli me Tangere and El Filibusterismo‚ authorizing the printing and distribution thereof‚ and for purposes. Citation Republic Act No. 1425 Territorial extent Philippines Enacted by Congress of the Philippines Date enacted June 12‚ 1956 Date signed June 12‚ 1956 Status: In force José Rizal Republic
Premium Catholic Church Philippines Roman Catholic Church
dissolution; if there is no partnership agreement‚ the partnership act set out the rights and duties of the partners. Such rights and duties (by act or agreement) may be varies by the consent of all partners. (S 19). ‘The relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view to profit.’ Under S24 (5) ‘in common’ means every partner has a say in the firm. The members are only liable for their subscription unless the partnership agreement says otherwise. Saywell V Rope
Premium Corporation Partnership
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)‚ are concerned protection of shareholder’s and creditor’s interests. We will identify possible legal issues in the relation to the Corporation Act 2001 and discuss whether they have been any breaches of relevant common law rules and statutory provisions in relation to ‘capital maintenance’‚ ‘share buy-backs’‚ financial assistance’ and ‘payment of dividends’. We will also briefly discuss ‘particular relevance of section 588G’ in relation to Roger. Doctrine of Capital
Premium Stock Stock market Debt